Question about the ending


I've seen this movie a couple times over the years, and still don't understand the ending. Did the earth split completely in two, and the other half went spinning off into space?

reply

Yep. That it did! Not too clear on screen but that is what you see spinning off into space.

reply

The problem is, like an egg being cracked in two, the magma would fall away from what is left from half of the Earth, and you would be left with half an eggshell, composed of nothing but a thin crust layer, and with the gravitational forces it would soon be ripped apart. And wouldn't the atmosphere also disappear when the Earth split in two? The end of the movie made it seem like they had survived the Earth splitting in two, but in reality they would be dead in a short while when the earth's crust collapsed on itself, or when the atmosphere was ripped away.

reply

This is very interesting.
I wish they would put this on TV.
I have a copy but its very bad.
Like a very old tape in LP.
It was a bootleg though.


MY Forum < http://www.hostingphpbb.com/forum/ >

reply

Not claiming papal infallibility about this, but -- iirc, the crack didn't completely bisect the globe. Isn't there a line about how, after they explode the nuclear device, the crack is not ultimately stopped, as they'd hoped, but is turned back toward the test site?

I think what happened was, a big plug was blown out of the crust, large enough to create a small moon. Not that such an event wouldn't still set off all kinds of cataclysmic seismic, atmospheric, gravitational, and who-knows-whatical effects. But at least we're not expected to accept that the Earth had survived being sliced in two like a grapefruit.

reply

I think the explanation about the flying chunk creating a second moon is correct. I saw the movie when I was a kid and thats exactly how I remember it. Entertaining, but even then I had major questions about the plausibility of what I was watching. Putting aside the probable loss of our atmosphere during the event, the gravitational repercussions of a second moon on our planet would be frightening, and life as we know it on earth would soon probably cease to exist,,,,

reply

No, I just re-watched this film, and the narrative clearly states that the fissure doubled-back on itself, creating a large (22,000 square mile) "chunk" of the earth, which will become a secondary moon. The final f/x shot shows the new glowing "moon" rising upward and joining the original moon, and suggests somehow everything is going to be just fine. Just to make sure, a chipmunk emerges from some rubble, proving the coast is clear. Chipmunks don't play, yo.

"You must have me confused with David Selznik. I don't make major motion pictures; I make crap."

reply

[deleted]

Not quite. About 22,000 square miles, however large that is.

-Hand

reply

mpoconnor7, to clarify only a segment of the earth blew off into space about 22,000 square mile. Or 150 by 150 miles surface area. Not enough to destroy the earth or split it in two (2).

reply

The land area of West Virginia is about 24,000 square miles.

reply

gerrythree, a small area compared to the U.S.A. let alone the entire Earth. The film is still very enjoyable despite some shaky scientific reasoning. Read our review.

reply

Nobody would miss West Virginia.

reply

"The land area of West Virginia is about 24,000 square miles. "

And we could well do without West Virginia!

reply

No. What happened what that the crack had doubled back on itself causing a large chunk of the surface and underlying mantle to be ejected into space. The ejected material became a second moon. (read the quotes section)

Teresa
http://MermaidLady.com

reply

And a second moon would play havoc with the tides. Also, all that dirt flying into the air would probably kill every living thing anyway eventually. The science wasn't that good, but the movie was fine for its time.

Life's like that, isn't it? Undercooked then over-baked and finally insipient.

reply

I think what happened is a 20,000 section of the earth got ejected into space eventually forming a second moon.

Think of it like a water balloon that is under high pressure that bursts in a small section sending matter off in that direction. The rest of the earth is gonna resphere into a slightly smaller sphere after several after shocks, quakes, volcanoes etc.

The second moon is gonna make lots of species extinct on earth. Not sure if humans can survive without other species. Its gonna affect gravity, tides everything.

A fascinating movie.

reply

LOL -- I've read this entire thread and there's about 12 posts that say the exact same thing. We got it the first time! :)

reply

And yet no one asked the question. How would the fragment achieve escape, let alone orbital velocity when the rotational velocity of the Earth is approximately 1000 MPH? Would not everything not nailed down also fly into space? And if it were a function of pressure below, that means the pressure was always there. This is just as idiotic because the crust cannot contain even close to that much pressure without rupturing eons ahead of time, relieving it.

This movie insults the intelligence of anyone with an IQ of room temperature and more. It is nothing more than an anti-nuke movie in disguise. If I wanted to subject myself to this tedious dreck I'd watch Algores glo-Bull warming movie which is based on the same level of science, junk.

And don't even insult intelligent people further by asking we suspend belief, because true science is not *belief*, junk science is. Good science fiction, reluctantly with the exception of F/X like "sound in space", does not ask you to disregard physics; At most, accept that there may be physics we do not yet comprehend, like super luminal transportation. Like The day After Tomorrow, a science fiction story about the Earth losing a fragment because of a man made or natural fracture does not even com close to this criteria.
_______________________________________________

The wise do not require a "word".

reply

Take it easy kid, it's only a movie...

Teresa
http://MermaidLady.com

reply

Exactly tuttt...
Dude is a di.., err... troll !
He makes comments like that about a 46yr old movie and then goes play in the "Stargate Universe", "Deep Core", and "Idiocracy" boards.
Thank You IMDB for the ignore button, and everyone that summed the ending to the movie up.

reply

DAYUM SON!!! THIS AIN'T A FREAKIN DOCUMENTARY!

reply

During the last scene I would love to have seen a shot of what they saw. That would have been sooo coool!

reply

Man! Chill! It's entertainment not a physics class.

reply