Ustinov's acting


There's no doubt. Ustinov's role in this movie undeniably deserved an oscar. I've seen him before in 'Death On The Nile' and 'Evil Under The Sun' where his marvellous acting drawed my attention to him. It's a shame he's dead.

reply

Yes, he has a very likeable quality about him. From interview excerpts of him, he appears to be a very funny and intelligent guy. Its a shame he's no longer with us.

reply

Don't miss his small part in "Spartacus". He played off Charles Laughton quite well.

reply

Ustinov was incredibly natural playing the bumbler. The first one I remembered was in "The Egyptian" where his character was smarter than his master but capable of playing the fool when necessary. Some of the same characteristics in "Spartacus" and in "Topkapi"; however in Topkapi Ustinov was wonderful at playing the nervous, ineffectual small time con caught up between the cops looking for gun smugglers and the burglars forced to use him as a last resort despite his obvious lack of physical ability. He was so natural in all of these; that's what I admire.

reply

I agree it was a great performance that made a great film - although the drawn-out tension of the heist itself was also amazing. I don't think I've ever been that transfixed before.

But yes - a shame he's dead, but he had a great and long life

reply

[deleted]

I think he is brilliant, but his best role by far is in We're No Angels.

reply

In reference to the OP, I'm not so inclined to agree. Ustinov's performance is quite good, to be sure ("endearing" is a word that comes to mind), and he was an ENORMOUSLY talented individual--look at his work as both star and co-writer of the enjoyable HOT MILLIONS just a few years later.

But was it really an Oscar-worthy performance? I don't quite see it. I don't feel like Ustinov does anything with the role that he didn't do in many of his other comic roles. And while I'm glad that a comic performance was honored by the Academy (something they do far too rarely), I think Stanley Holloway's Alfred Doolittle in MY FAIR LADY was the more deserving nominee. He simply, to my mind, creates the more memorable character. Ustinov gives a fun performance in a fun film, but to me it just doesn't rise to the level of award-worthiness. I am interested to see what he did with his Oscar-winning role in SPARTACUS; given that SPARTACUS is a drama, I'd imagine his performance there was more complex.

reply

It's kind of a similar performance, as he quietly brings a likeability to an owner of a gladiator training school. His performance is definitely the best in the movie. He just makes you root for him.

reply

ditto to that dmcdknf!! 😉

reply

HEAR,HEAR to that dmcdknf.He was brilliant in that movie as was Bogie and Ray.

reply

Best Supporting Actor 1960:
Peter Ustinov – Spartacus
Sal Mineo – Exodus
Peter Falk – Murder, Inc.
Chill Wills – The Alamo
Jack Kruschen – The Apartment

Best Supporting Actor 1964:
Peter Ustinov – Topkapi
John Gielgud – Becket
Stanley Holloway – My Fair Lady
Edmond O'Brien – Seven Days in May
Lee Tracy – The Best Man

The 1960 field isn't that great. Ustinov and Kruschen are probably the only ones who even deserve to be there; I haven't seen Murder, Inc., and Falk IS apparently quite good, but neither Mineo nor Wills deserved nominations that I remember.

The 1964 field is a good deal better; of the nominees, I would probably go with Holloway, but I've heard good things about Tracy and Ustinov honestly isn't a terrible choice. Just not a great one.

reply

Completely disagree about Sal Mineo in Exodus. He is the heart and soul of that movie and deserved it more than Ustinov's forgettable performance in Spartacus, not an actors' movie. Mineo even won the Globe. Of course, the truly best (arguably lead) performance that year, Anthony Perkins in Psycho, was snubbed.

I like Peter Ustinov, but I think he was much more distinctive and even award-worthy in Death on the Nile, where he actually had to do something, than in either of his two Oscar-winning roles. Topkapi was such a nothing overall. Perhaps I'm biased because I just watched the original Pink Panther, and I get that Topkapi is more of a serious caper film with touches of humor, but to me it's drawn-out and unmemorable by comparison. The most memorable performance to me was Mercouri's because of her distinctive voice and playfulness in the role.

O'Brien was forgettable in a large, star-studded cast in Seven Days in May. Haven't seen the others but would probably gladly go with Holloway even though it was nothing undeniable and Ustinov had the more memorable career.

reply

for any peter ustinov fans try watching quo vadis.i thought he was excellent in that..for me one of his best ever roles

reply

Yeah, Ustinov was a true giant. One of my favorites. It's unfortunate that he didn't have even more roles worthy of his talent.

reply

[deleted]