Just saw a documentary that said this is one of the worst movies ever.


Bullsh!t.

"Leave and never darken my towels again!"

reply

What was this documentary called? 'Everything We're About To Tell You Is A Lie', perhaps?

"Of course it's me, who were you expecting?"

reply

It was called "The 50 Worst Movies of All Time". It was an awful list, it was full of Godzilla and Ed Wood movies. And Spider Baby was 6 or 5 I think.

"Leave and never darken my towels again!"

reply

Why did it say it was bad? Ed Wood movies aren't that bad, just a bit boring tbh.

"Of course it's me, who were you expecting?"

reply

I can think of a few reasons. The acting was absolutely awful. The scene where the delivery guy is killed in the window, and the ridiculous "struggles" of Emily when she is being killed were very amateurish. When Peter is tied up, it is also obvious that he is not trying to escape. It is one of those movies that are so bad, that they are entertaining.

reply

MIchiganJFrogg, on one hand I agree with you. However, we're talking about a horror movie that was made in 1964, a time when ALL horror movies were ridiculous. In those days there was no such thing as realism in movies -- and horror makers in particular had to tread lightly because of the motion picture code. If you look at "What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?," "The Birds," anything with Vincent Price or any other name horror movies from that era, you'll find similar corny acting and general silliness. In my mind, "Spider Baby" is not a bottom-of-the-barrel production because there's a genuine sense of foreboding in spite of the intentionally tongue-in-cheek shenanigans.

reply

"The scene where the delivery guy is killed in the window"

The "delivery guy" is Mantan Moreland. I was delighted to see him here.

reply

Actually, considering this was only filmed in seven days, this is a remarkably well-shot film. Some of the cinematography and tracking shots through the house are miles ahead of millions of B to Z horror movies I've seen. Also, for a 1964 movie, I think it was ahead of its time.

reply

@Dzersim
Where did you hear that this was shot in seven days? On the DVD, Quinn Redeker (Peter) talks about how he spent at least two weeks on the set.

Anyway, I don't see why someone would put this on any Worst Ever list. It had a few pretty creative and creepy ideas, the cast was adequate, with Chaney and the woman who played the spider girl delivering genuinely good performances, and the story wasn't anywhere near as derivative as most of the b-horror fare at the time. I think this is one of those movies that definitely deserve their cult status.

reply

It took 11-12 days to shoot. Aug-Sept 1964.

reply



The list you refer to
is way up there on most fans' "Stupidest List" list.

reply

I don't get why it would be on anyone's "worst movies" list. It's bad, yes, but enjoyably bad, '60s B movie camp at its best. As insanely bizarre as the premise sounds, I found myself getting into it once the plot got going. Most of the cast was passable, for a B movie, but the two actresses who played Elizabeth and Virginia were terrible--they couldn't act their way out of a paper bag, let alone a spider web. Chaney's was, by far, the best performance in the movie. His acting in the role of Bruno is what saves this film from being a standard cheap B picture and makes it worth watching.

Nevermore!

reply

[deleted]

I'm surprised that someone up there said that Ed Wood's films "aren't that bad, just a bit boring." They are the opposite.

reply

One of Lon Chaney's best performances. Only a fool would call this movie bad.

reply

SPIDER BABY is not supposed to be "good". It's a cult, low-budget picture where the era and the outrageous family are its main appeal.

--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA


reply

It's not the worst but definitely the most unnecessary and stupidest.

reply