MovieChat Forums > Seven Days in May (1964) Discussion > One reason this film works so well.

One reason this film works so well.


Is that they left out the ideology. The bad guys are wrong, not because they are on the right, but because they try to overthrow the Constitution. The good guys are not right because they are liberals and only want "what is best for the country", but because they are trying to preserve democracy in the US. There are no slogans or political slurs. It's a straight up fight. Legal vs illegal. Democracy vs authoritarianism and possibly dictatorship. If you watch the re-make,(1994-HBO-"The Enemy Within") the liberals who made it just couldn't resist explaining how superior the president and the left are, and how bad Scott and the military are because they're crypto-facist right-wingers. As a result, the film loses all its power and force, becoming just another liberal scolding of those evil conservatives. YUK-O!



reply

Funny, just after watching SDIM this morning, I read news story about how Christian fundamentalists continue to harass other cadets at the U.S. Air Force Academy -- five years after they were ordered to knock it off. Right wing senators continue to appoint these crazy so-called "Christians," and by their actions it's clear they take their orders from a "higher power" and not the chain of command.
And there's at least five years worth of Air Force officers now in the pipeline with dreams of Rapture and effective control of nuclear weapons.
Sounds like a great time for a re-make.

reply


"Sounds like a great time for a re-make."

So someone with your ideological views can overlay the whole thing with the party line, and make it just another propaganda film....no THANX!!!



reply

Here's the thing; this movie isn't about politics. It's about people following their conscience. Or at least that's how I took it.

The President, obviously, is worried about the arms race and the instability and growing threat to world peace that it represents (remember, this was only a few years after the Cuban missile crisis). Because of that, he sees no choice but to sign the treaty. It's his obligation to his countrymen and the entire human race - either that or they all go up in smoke.

General Scott, OTOH, is worried about a treaty that's going to cause the defeat or even destruction of the United States in a matter of months - like he tells the President, that's not even enough time to wait for the next election. What's a man to do? Well, there's one thing he can do; it violates his oath of office and permanently stains his honor, but it's either that or his countrymen and the entire world fall under the Soviet boot.

(Not saying either one of them is seeing things accurately, just explaining what leads them to do what they're doing).

Scott isn't a cardboard fascist stereotype, even if some people who watch the movie see it that way. And Lyman isn't a cardboard bleeding-heart intellectual stereotype either. They're both men faced with an extraordinary situation and reacting to it the best way they know, even in the face of overwhelming public opposition (Lyman) or legal authority (Scott), because it's the only thing their conscience will allow them to do. That adds up to an incredibly good story.


I love it when a plan comes together.

reply

Well it's about politics to the extent that it's a tribute and a warning to the American system of government, but you agree with me in that they pretty much left ideology out of it. Even Casey who agrees ideologically with Scott, cannot countenance the extra-legal way Scott wants to "save" the nation. Security at the cost of freedom and democracy. And Lyman genuinely believes the treaty will ensure "peace for our time." Of course the liberals have ALWAYS been given the benefit of the doubt in Hollywood.



reply