Here we go again....The Re-Make - Kitten with a Whip (1965) Discussion

[–] incrowd 19 years ago

No biggie.

Probably it'd be just another forgettable & needless 'because nobody demanded it' remake that'll pass by without making much of a ripple, BUT it could likely trigger a welcome dvd release of the original...

reply

[–] 19 years ago

[deleted]

[–] robertjonesfoto 17 years ago

Great classics should NOT be re-made, but flawed or forgotten classics SHOULD. This is one of them. Lindsay Lohan would be great if she'd just EAT! As the senator, a great straight-arrow actor would be Jeff Daniels (who needs to eat a little less these days).

reply

[–] DisturbedPixie 12 years ago

what happens if a wonderful film gets remade into crap? People will gush over the original, and like another poster said, they will release it on bluray. It's good for fans, so nobody should worry about it. It's fun to watch remakes anyways for the sake of comparing films.

reply

[–] R_Kane (15828) 4 years ago

“Could” (conditional) and “likely” (probable) do not belong together.

reply

[–] Manon_1 17 years ago

Can't stand La Lohan. She's a celebrity not an actress nor a signer. She makes me cringe.

reply

[–] adeley2008 17 years ago

supposedly lindsay and her people got the rights for a remake

reply

[–] Falconeer 16 years ago

Lindsay Lohan trying to fill the shoes of Ann Margaret in Kitten With A Whip? The vanity and arrogance of todays Hollywood 'biatches' never ceases to amaze. Not to mention the character in that film was supposed to be a teen, and Lohan doesn't exactly look like a teen these days. (Hint: Coke is not a beauty product)

reply

[–] a-ride-in-the-ocean 16 years ago

I'd like to see people go to Hollywood to protest all these *beep* remakes but really I don't care. The one upside of remakes is it always tends to coincide with the DVD-reissue of the original movie or tv show the remake was based on.

reply

[–] yesterdaysman_2000 16 years ago

Ok first off, what article did you read this in? This sounds like some made up internet rumor garbage. Second, WHY would anyone want to remake this? This kind of movie will never play with todays audience.

reply

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] megArnold 16 years ago

one thing about Lohan if she want it she'll get it

Even more if no one else wants it...

Seriously, who needs a remake of (a)THIS, (b)WITH HER, (c)NOW?

reply

[–] mikeoak840 14 years ago

This is a movie, not a venereal disease, so Lohan's got no chance of getting it. Her career's so far down the rat hole that it takes sunlight 8 billion years to get there.

reply

[–] 14 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 14 years ago

[deleted]

[–] yesterdaysman_2000 15 years ago

Hmmm Rocky, Rambo, Indiana Jones....Kitten with a whip. Yeah that belongs in the same sentence. I guess YOU have your pulse on what NO ONE wants.

reply

[–] mikeoak840 14 years ago

Rocky, Rambo & Indiana Jones were sequels, not remakes. Further, they only did so-so box office with stars whose names are in pretty good condition, so to speak. But you're talking about a remake of a movie that would no longer be found as shocking as the original at the time it was released, with a hack actress with no credibility, no acting talent, and a lot of bad publicity she drags around with her. It would be doomed from the start on so many levels, so as to make it completely impossible.

reply

[–] narcolepticsloth 14 years ago

I'd say let Lohan remake this pile of crap. She does need to pay for her drug habits after all..

reply

[–] metalmaharani 14 years ago

I don't necessarily have a problem with Lindsay as an actress. What I do have a problem with is her trying to embody roles &/or actresses that she is incapable of adding to. The point of a re-make is to be able to better a previously made film. I wouldn't even have to see the film re-make to know Lindsay would leave a deficit.

A paper man cut into shreds
By his own pair of scissors
He'll never forgive her

reply

[–] DisturbedPixie 12 years ago

no, the point of a remake is to make money. If they can make money with her starring in a remake of this, than it is a success.

The point of fans wanting a remake is to see the film in a modern twist or with better special effects, which preferably makes it better. But that is a lot to ask for considering many remakes are done just decently enough to bring in big bucks from the idiots/teenagers that don't even know it's a remake.

But to move on from the point of remakes, If Lohan loves this movie than she probably always dreamed of being in a remake of it and would work somewhat hard on doing a good job, so it's better than Megan Fox being cast in it, right? Just looking at the pros of it.

reply

[–] R_Kane (15828) 4 years ago

“Than,” “then”? Aw, who cares?

I do. I care a lot. Language matters.

reply

[–] laustcawz-789-925423 12 years ago

...& we all thought the original was campy...

reply

[–] kstallings100 11 years ago

Well, it couldn't be any worse than the original. Right?

reply

[–] rphilip1 11 years ago

Well in the original the girl's 17 years old. Lohan is almost 30 and looks well into her 40s.

reply