MovieChat Forums > Kiss Me, Stupid (1964) Discussion > Should be titled, 'Don't Watch Me, Stupi...

Should be titled, 'Don't Watch Me, Stupid'


Just saw this curiosity on TCM; Robert Osborne's intro about how bad the critics panned it originally and the Catholic Legion of Decency blacklisted it made me curious to see if it really lived up to how bad I had read in other places it was.

Let me assure you, it was definitely UNFUNNY. Yes, I know Billy Wilder was pushing the envelope in the early 60's with this, trying to be hip, cool, and provocative but it all just comes out rather crude and/or unfunny. I don't think I cracked a smile at all throughout the movie. I certainly didn't laugh at it.

Dean Martin's acting was smooth and natural (maybe it wasn't an act?), the Barney and Zelda characters were professionally played, but Ray Walston and Kim Novak just seemed to be always a half-beat off on their characters, Walston just trying too hard and Novak just hard to watch and listen to, trying to imitate a Marilyn-Monroe-doing-a-Joisey/Brooklyn accent.

This movie was so hard to watch at times that I was about to turn it off more than once, but I guess I just had to watch it all the way through at least once to see just how bad it was. Let me tell you, it was bad - let me save you some time and recommend you skip it. (Robert Osborne did mention in his intro that Peter Sellers was supposed to play the husband role but had some heart attacks and had to drop out; Marilyn Monroe was also supposed to play Kim Novak's role but had tragically died by then. I can see how Sellers and Monroe would have been much better based on their past comedic roles; yes, the script would have still been amateurish but the execution would have been more passable and less grating.)

It has this horrible feel of like a community theater group trying their darnedest with a very unfunny script, and just plugging away at it. You have to wonder if the cast knew how bad the script was while they were filming it.

A couple of interesting trivia tidbits - I see from the IMDB full cast listing that the great voice artist Mel Blanc played the dentist cameo, and Laugh-In's Henry Gibson played "Smith" (which character was that?).

If you want to see what I think is Kim Novak's best role, skip this "Kiss Me, Stupid" travesty, bypass Hitchcock's "Vertigo," and seek out the lesser-known 1960 "Strangers When We Meet." Kim does a great job as a naive, emotionally vulnerable, naturally stunning suburban neighborhood beauty in that movie who gets entangled in a relationship with nearby stay-at-home architect Kirk Douglas. That movie hits all the right notes in all their complexities; a little suburban Peyton Place, simmering and boiling just beneath the calm suburbia surface.

As for tonight's movie, for the life of me, I can't figure out how it ever rated a 7.0 on the IMDB 10.0 scale. I logged on, fully expecting to see a 2.5 or thereabouts. I guess it's time to put my 1.5 vote in to help reach a more realistic average rating....

reply

I have to agree with you, I had never seen this before either and watched out of curiosity. It was not a good movie. I had no problem with the actors, Walston and Novak did a good job with what was presented but the script & plot were really sub par.

It was a stupid premise and Walston's character was just beyond dumb. The cheap B&W photography didn't help either. Most movies were in color by 1964 and the lack of color made this look even cheaper than it would have in color.

I missed half the sex jokes because I was just bored. I can watch Dean Martin in anything but even he came across as obnoxious and sleazy, I usually love him in his other movies.

Disappointing all the way around.

reply

I just watched this on TCM the other night as well. I was really put off by the ludicrous plot and sleazy conclusion. Nothing was funny enough to compensate for the icky, sitcom shenanigans.

reply

i thought it was good, (but i love novak and wilder so maybe im a tad biased) it seemed to be reaching for something (not just risque but groundbreaking) and not quite getting it but still interesting, i believe if sellers had stayed on as the lead this would be a truly great film

reply

I certainly agree with your assessment. Following classics such as Some Like it Hot and The Apartment, one hoped his would be somewhat in that league, maybe even a little. It is quite an unfunny comedy. I watched it because I like Kim Novak and Dean Martin (I thought she was fine here, Martin not). Ray Walston played one of my all-time most unfavorite characater.....a guy so jealous and insecure, then later dopey. It was unwatchable, but I hung in there 75% through on Netflix before I gave up and jumped to the ending. Too bad, Billy Wilder.

Thanks for the addition recommendation of your personal choice for best Novak film. I'll check that out sometime.

reply

Yep -- It's 2016 and this film still sucks. Wilder is, of course, a favorite writer-director, but this one misses by a mile! I hadn't ever come across it over the years, but I really can't figure out how he wound up creating such low-class mess. The 'jokes' were a bad joke . . .

I saw the TCM promos showing this movie coming
up so I scheduled the DVR
to record it tonight. Well, that was a waste of
of time AND space. My
husband and I weren't 10
minutes into it when we
asked ourselves why we
were watching it. Nothing funny, clever or interesting.

So, the offending film has been removed from the DVR and we're on to something better!! Thank the Heavens, our choices are seemingly endless!!!

reply