MovieChat Forums > Hamlet (1964) Discussion > I can see why Burton wanted the tape des...

I can see why Burton wanted the tape destroyed


Supposedly, this performance was taped once and broadcast, and Richard Burton requested that the tapes be destroyed afterwards. I can see why - it was a simply terrible production with bad performances all around.

Burton himself is probably the biggest disappointment, because I expected so much from his performance. He acts as though he's a) drunk and b) doesn't really give a damn, hoping that his voice and star power will carry him through as he shouts his way through the production. At some level he's thrilling to listen to, but as many have noted, he gives recitation, not acting.

Hume Cronyn was the only member of the supporting cast who gave a memorable performance. He really played to the audience, but that's fine in a stage production. Cronyn made Polonius very funny, as he's supposed to be. The rest of the actors and actresses involved seem to have no idea of what to do with the material. Whoever played Laertes was memorably bad, and Alfred Drake brought nothing to what should have been the most important role in the play after Hamlet's.

And to top it all off, the audio and visual quality is poor. Surely they had better recording technology in 1964!

reply

Ouch, Edward! I must disagree with you about Burton's performance -- though not about the rest of the production: Laertes doesn't do anything for me, and Claudius is rather unmemorable. Cronyn is hilarious and endearing, almost at the expense of the performance as a whole. When he dies, it's hard to forgive Hamlet, and the rest of the play struggles to regain momentum.

There's certainly something to your point about Burton giving a recitation rather than a performance; he seems particularly unconcerned with his own physicality -- he twirls and spins, and keeps his hands limply against his stomach much of the time.

On the other hand, as recitations go, I think it's pretty damned effective. The "What a rogue and peasant slave" speech is excellent, and I like the self-described "febrile" quality Burton brings to lines like, "Frailty...thy name...is WOMAN!" And I love the way he toys with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. But best of all is his "words words words" scene with Cronyn -- I don't think I've ever seen it done so effectively.

Granted, it's not for everyone; his Hamlet has got to be one of the most aggressive ever performed (though I haven't seen Steven Berkoff's). I wish we could see his earlier on-stage performances, when he wasn't so obviously in his forties.

I don't agree with Ron Rosenbaum about everything, but he puts Burton's Hamlet in the company of Olivier's Richard III, Welles' Chimes at Midnight, and Brook's King Lear as some of the finest Shakespeare captured on film.

reply