Bond a sexist


Bond saying man talk and slapping Dink's bum.

reply

Dick's bum? You mean Dink's bum?

Troll.


"Attica! Attica!"

reply

Yes Dink's bum

reply

You mean bum´s dick?



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

Your a bums dick!



"Just sign it (Obamacare) we'll read it later ..." Nancy (pig bristles) Pelosi

reply

"You're a woman of many parts, Pussy."


Says it all...

May thy blade chip and shatter...

reply

I wouldn't have minded Bond tapping me on my bum and sending me away to talk business, but I would have minded him sleeping with Jill Masterson just an hour later.

reply

Well, from a guy's perspective, one hour is a long enough time to establish that the previous relationship has run its course.

reply

I agree with rochelle! Its not the slap, its the "other girl" action which really is sexist!

reply

i agree also. he could slap my bum any time, but the other girl would piss me off.

reply

There is no evidence at all that Bond had a committed relationship with Dink. He’s free to do as he likes.

Don’t embarrass yourself by trying to tell me that women don’t sleep around.

reply

Say hello to the 60's. A very different time.

reply

There is no apostrophe in “60s.”
It’s a plural, not a possessive. Read The Chicago Manual of Style.

Yes, I enjoy being a dick when confronted by ignorance and/or intellectual sloth.

reply

Bond using Dink as a shield was *beep* hilarious.

reply

You know that "Dink" was the model whom the lights, signs and pics were projected on (her body) in the main titles.

reply

I knew that. It's an infamous piece of Goldfinger trivia. You wouldn't recognize her though in that gold paint and darker lighting.

reply

How is it “infamous”? Answer: it’s not. It may be notorious. It may be famous, but it is not disgraceful. You use language ignorantly.

reply

I get a chuckle seeing she's also in "A Hard Day's Night" at the gambling club (the one in the beginning of Dr. No!) next to Grandpa. ("I bet you're a great swimmer!") And of course Smithers was the train passenger who resented the Beatles' company as he travels on that train regularly - twice a week!

reply

James Bond is a heterosexual male that all men shoul emulate ... 4 hoes in each film ... Love it! Wish it was 1964 again!

reply

this is what stupid men desire to emulate.

all a man needs is one woman.... and fresh, untainted wilderness.

____

I AM
____

reply

umm-hum
You keep believing that

reply

it's a fact plain and simple

problem is your a square. there's too many straight lines in your world. you live in a cube.

go into the wilderness my son.... and you will understand.

a strong man needs only one strong woman.

weak boys need many weak girls.

but then again weak people need a lot of "things" to be satisfied.... example. an old sick man needs to be hooked up to many machines and have many people looking out for him.

do not argue with me.... just learn.

____

I AM
____

reply

problem is your a square


Thank you. I'll take that as the complement I'm sure you meant it to be.

go into the wilderness my son.... and you will understand.

You don't know me. I get to the wilderness as often as I can.
What does this have to do with a man wanting women?

do not argue with me.... just learn.


Ahh..the arrogance of youth.


I periodically misspell words just to annoy the word police.

reply


There are a couple of occasions in the early Bond films where Connery has a wolfish smile on his face regarding women that my brother and I refer to as his happy rapist smile.

Try emulating that nowadays and you would either be rotting in prison or dying of dick rot. Or both.



"Remember, you have to make it home to get paid" (The Dogs of War)

reply

You say it like it's a bad thing?

"Remember, you have to make it home to get paid" (The Dogs of War)

reply

Of course he was. Any normal man would jump at the chance to make love to a beautiful woman- or two - or three
..

reply

Well, it is a bond movie.

reply

People have to lighten up it's a Bond movie made in 1964. Nowadays some of his behavior towards women would not be tolerated but I am smart enough to know by 1964 mores he was just being a guy. Still a great movie and Sean was the best Bond.

reply

I'm not sure that would have been seen any differently back then, but yet it is supposed to be a comical part of his womanizing character.

reply

Not “would have.” It WAS. Some of us were actually alive in 1964.

And I don’t give a damn about of what you “are sure.”

reply