MovieChat Forums > The Evil of Frankenstein (1964) Discussion > inferior make up job supports grotesque ...

inferior make up job supports grotesque creature


Many have said that the make up job of trying to copy the original frankenstein created a "botched chopped up work". Well, this actually supports the idea that the creature really was put together by corpses and thus more scary and unsettling. Any thought and/or comments?

reply

I've always felt that Roy Ashton's work on EVIL was probably one of the best makeups to come out of a post-Karloff Frankenstein film. It is far superior to that of Lee's monster, and supports the stitched-together-from-corpses premise.

Dead flesh does tend to be grey or yellowish, and Ashton's job on this film was superb in capturing that aspect. The square, blocked-off skull and sunken eyes suggest some aspect of Dr. Frankenstein's "handiwork" with regards to how he built and literally "shaped" his creature.

reply

i love it! i think its one of the scariest creatures ever

reply

I liked the makeup a lot actually. The monster looked very creepy and I could see why everyone who came in contact with it was afraid.

I've been waiting for you, Ben.

reply

I like the monster make up in this too, It looks very crumbly. As though it could flake off on to you on contact. There's a good picture of the Evil of Frankenstein' monster on Kiwi Kingston's personal page on here.

reply

this actually supports the idea that the creature really was put together by corpses and thus more scary and unsettling.


Well said. It might be Papier-mâché, but it's effective for this gothic flick from the early 60s.

reply