MovieChat Forums > Thunderbirds (1965) Discussion > Did characters dis/like each other?

Did characters dis/like each other?


Do you ever think that some of the brothers didn't like each other? Or Jeff played favourites?

I always thought Virgil and John didn't get on. One episode John is bossing Virgil around when flying TB2. In another episode Virgil says something bitchy about John after John calls in to report that he is still getting 'cry wolf' calls from those two annoying Australian boys (who really need rescuing this time).

Jeff was always grumpier with John and Gordon.

Any others or am I just a TB tragic? (Err, don't answer that - I am).

M

reply

I never thought about but, you'd think that Alan would have got the most stick being the youngest, the episode that ended in Paris (with all the fireworks) he got a telling off for being "too young" and the only thing that saved the day was that Tin-Tin was allowed to join him.

"Do I get a coconut?"

"If we get out of this, I'll buy you all the coconuts you can eat!"

reply

Actually, there is a lot to pick up on...!

It wasn't so much that Virgil was being nasty to John about the Williams brothers, but he was just ribbing a kid brother as big brothers tend to. It's rather silly, since it is John's job to discern the validity of rescue calls. Everyone tends to forget, but the only way to get help from IR is to convince John that you really need it; without that, your call never gets to the head man!!!

Yep, Jeff IS more grumpy with John and Gordon than the others, but he bites the other boys' heads off at times as well. Gordon is too flighty for Jeff's serious nature, accounting for some cross words from dear ol' dad. Jeff seems to get grumpy with John only when he's not pleased with the nature of the message being delivered. According to the 1990s books, Virgil is really Jeff's favorite because of his strong resemblance to his departed wife, Lucille, but it's obvious how fond Jeff is of Scott as well. He spoils Alan rotten (race cars indeed!), accounting for a lot of that "spoiled brat" behavior on his part.

As for the boys: Scott seems very fond of John and was very gentle with him during his one rescue adventure (Danger At Ocean Deep). I love how he talks to him as if he were still a little kid during the rescue mission; it's so cute. John came off as rather snippy with Virgil, but then that makes sense because even though we're told that John's been on other rescues, he's still in a position of having to prove himself and was nervous. Alan and Gordon are best friends, as are Scott and Virgil, but they relate to each other differently. The younger two tend to be silly and often form a giddy trio with Tin-Tin, while the elder two are very calm and civil and seem to anticipate each others' thoughts. It's obvious how close they are. (And, according to the comics, John and Brains became good friends while attending Tracy College together, so they pal around when John's at home).

I loved the way the Tracy boys were portrayed in the novelization of "Thunderbirds Are Go," wherein they were seen chasing each other around the pool and whacking each other with towels and the like. It sounded exactly like how these close, loving brothers would interact.

reply

I haven't read any of the comic books - any suggestions of which series is the best? Don't know if they sell them in Australia but I suppose there are plenty on the web.

It sorta looks like John gets left out because of his stints on TB3. But John is older than Virgil, isn't he? All the fanbooks from the 70s say so (John is 25, and Virgil is 24). And Virgil is critical after John signs off from the Cry Wolf episode and is talking to Jeff and Scott. May be it is just the voice talent, but since we don't get a lot of non-rescue conversation these scraps of relationship talks is all we have to go on - and it seemed harsh that Virgil would criticise John behind his back.

I love the episode Danger at Ocean Deep, especially when Scott cuts open the door and tells John to 'quick help me get them out' because the ship is about to blow. John responds by turning around and make a comment about the sea bubbling and doesn't make a move to help. And their little 'argument' at the end is cute indeed, but you'll notice Jeff comes down on Scott's side. I too wondered why they didn't try and toe the ship out of harm's way.

I think it is a pity that John was not used much when he was on Tracy Island. Or Gordon either. Having Scott and Virgil doing everything just got a bit predictable after a time.

reply

[deleted]

[I haven't read any of the comic books - any suggestions of which series is the best? Don't know if they sell them in Australia but I suppose there are plenty on the web.]

The best series was "The Complete Thunderbirds Story" which appeared in the 1990s comics, though the story did rearrange some of the details evident in the series. The 1990s comics often come up for sale on eBay and other auction sites. For action-related stories, the best are the ones which appeared in TVCentury21 magazine. Many of those have been reprinted in hardback and soft cover editions over the years.

[t sorta looks like John gets left out because of his stints on TB3. But John is older than Virgil, isn't he? All the fanbooks from the 70s say so (John is 25, and Virgil is 24).]

No, it's just the opposite: All of the source books, the biographies featured in the comics, the calendars and even one of the 1960s novels stated that Virgil is older than John. Virgil was originally supposed to be 27 and John 25 (they were later de-aged to 25 and 24, for some silly reason). The more recent calendars (I think beginning with the UK 1999 calendar) misprinted John's birth year as "2034," making him four years older than Scott, who we know to be the eldest. Even the 2001 annual (Carlton's first) had the correct birth order (Scott, Virgil, John, Gordon and Alan), and Jeff's photo album as shown in "Thunderbirds Are Go" definitively tells us that John is the third son. However, for some very odd reason, the person who runs the international fan club thinks that John is older than Virgil and his book "The Complete Book Of Thunderbirds" switched the birth order accordingly. Hopefully Sylvia Anderson's upcoming book will help to clear up this mess once and for all.

[I love the episode Danger at Ocean Deep, especially when Scott cuts open the door and tells John to 'quick help me get them out' because the ship is about to blow. John responds by turning around and make a comment about the sea bubbling and doesn't make a move to help. And their little 'argument' at the end is cute indeed, but you'll notice Jeff comes down on Scott's side. I too wondered why they didn't try and toe the ship out of harm's way.]

What's bizarre about John's "rescue" adventure is that he's really not allowed to do anything more than he normally does: he maintains contact between the rescue vehicles. He can't do much of anything with that radio in hand all of the time he's on the OP2, so he never gets to prove that he's just as capable of helping out as his brothers. As for the "argument," Jeff was just plain rude to dress John down in that manner by suggesting that his opinion was of less value because he'd not been on as many rescues as Scott. Jeff is the one who decides who gets to go on missions and there are a number of situations presented during the series in which John is both at home AND the was better person to send to the rescue site based on his expertise, yet Jeff doesn't send him along. For example, in "Operation: Crashdive," it would have made far more sense for Jeff to send along John on the test flight, since he has more expertise with wiring, communications and aeronautics than Gordon does. Instead, goofy little Gordon goes along and nearly talks Scott's ear off while he's supposed to be mending the junction! Silly Jeff---rescues aren't for kids! (And yeah, we know this is all Gerry Anderson's fault, but within the story it makes Jeff look pretty awful).



reply

O.o never knew that Virgil was older then John...Mmmm i radder keep Virgil younge then John. Oh well, you could choose how you see it.

Chibi Max

~* The howl of a lonely wolf*~

reply

[O.o never knew that Virgil was older then John...Mmmm i radder keep Virgil younge then John. Oh well, you could choose how you see it.]

Yeah, but it doesn't make any sense for Virgil to be older than John, and, as mentioned, this is only a recent and unsupported notion. If you look at Virgil's relationship with Scott, it's obvious how close they are, both in age (look at those mature faces) and mannerism. For example, Virgil and Scott call the rest of their brothers "boy" throughout the series; you never hear the other three call their older brothers that. (I don't think they'd dare)! And there's a level of maturity that both Virgil and Scott have that the others don't. You don't see Virgil bopping to rock tunes (he likes classical and jazz music), but John, Gordon and Alan are all crazy about the Cass Carnaby Five instead. (And I'm not touching the fact that we see Virgil with an electric guitar)...! Plus, there's the element of the hair: Virgil's got a staid, neatly combed style (and an "after five" shadow at times), while John has that cute, boyish, pop singer quiff throughout most of the series (and he never appears to need a shave, no matter what time we see him). All of that is there to support the character development which dialog wasn't used to convey. But the episode "Atlantic Inferno" was one of the few times wherein the pecking order was reinforced within the series. The novels and comics did a far better job of this and confirmed the correct birth order on numerous occasions. So yeah, John is indeed the classic middle child...!

reply