MovieChat Forums > Toys in the Attic (1963) Discussion > Who walks around with $150,000 in their ...

Who walks around with $150,000 in their jacket?


In New Orleans, no less. Next time try a checking account, Dino. Would have made for less melodrama and more interesting movie, if Hellman were up to it.

reply

I loved this movie, but yeah, that was not very smart!

reply

The character wasn't very smart.

I think that was the point (as well as his not used to being 'monied up' and the story needing his walking around with all that cash as a plot device).

Also, I don't know the original time period of the story, but that amount in 1963 (year of the movie) would be about one million dollars today!





"I can't stand a naked light bulb, any more than..a rude remark or a vulgar action" Blanche DuBois

reply

In New Orleans, no less. Next time try a checking account, Dino. Would have made for less melodrama and more interesting movie, if Hellman were up to it.

You must have never seen 'The Steel Trap'. The main character steals 1 million dollars and walks around with the suitcase of money through most of the movie.

Just for the record, I'm not a Dude, I'm a Dudette!

reply

In The Grifters, a female con artist carries stacks of cash in the trunk of her car.

reply

He's a 'Flash Harry' type who wants people to think that he knows a secret they don't... It may not have been very smart, but I thought that it WAS true to the character.






"Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!"

reply

[deleted]

Somebody who did not trust banks.

reply

Many people in the 50's and 60's did not trust banks, this was on point with Dino's role IMO.



"What's in those things Bert?"........"A few household items in the proper proportions."

reply

CincyDude says > In New Orleans, no less. Next time try a checking account, Dino. Would have made for less melodrama and more interesting movie, if Hellman were up to it.
It does seem crazy to have that much money in his jacket pocket but let's not forget Julian had already spent a lot of the money. He paid off the house, bought household appliances, tickets to Europe and to New York, and he replenished his sisters' bank account. Whatever was left, which would still have been substantial, is what he had in his wallet. Anyway, there were some good reasons to carry cash.

1. Today banks ask a lot of questions so they can report us to the government; so they, in turn, can tax us through the nose. The same may have been true back then; especially when depositing such a large sum of money. He didn't want to have to pay taxes on it.

2. The money was probably paid to him off the books and Julian had no legitimate source of income to explain where he'd gotten it. The fewer questions asked the better.

3. Julian was heading to New York for an extended stay. He probably planned to deposit the money when he and Lily decided where they'd live.

4. I'm not sure you could easily access your account from another state at that time.

5. Having the money on his person was probably easier to keep track of and keep safe than putting it in his luggage; at least that's what he probably thought.

6. Credit cards weren't widely available or used during that time. He knew he'd need spending money but wasn't sure exactly how much he'd need.

7. Having helped him secure the funds, Julian probably planned to give some of the money to Charlotte Warkins so she could start a new life. Cash, as opposed to a bank note, would have been the best way to keep her husband from tracking her down.


Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]

reply

Somebody who's waiting for his sister to convince his wife to tell the husband of the woman he was involved with what's going on so that husband can send thugs to beat the hell out of him and take the money.

Any other questions? ;-)

reply