MovieChat Forums > Tom Jones (1963) Discussion > One of the Academy's Best Choices for Be...

One of the Academy's Best Choices for Best Motion Picture


This film is a rollicking tribute to the picaresque novel--a genre in which a scoundrel makes his way up the socio-economic ladder with nothing but his wits (sharpened by hunger) and a lust for life. The score is in a category by itself, as is much of the acting. And the hunting scene is no amateurish effort, but a delightful recreation of a day in the countryside centuries ago. I don't see how people can fault a movie of such originality and spunk, one that really transports you into the past as it breathes life into a literary classic, but then again, I am not a fan of "worst" lists to begin with . . . what a waste of time to write about works of art that you don't like or wish to deflate because you feel they are overrated.

reply

I'd rather see more posts looking for recordings of "She's a Lady" and "It's Not Unusual" on this site instead of more "Worst Best Picture" posts.

reply

Possibly part of the reason why this constantly appears on "Worst Best Picture" lists is the inability of some people to distinguish between a film which may not have deserved to win Best Picture but is still a good movie (Tom Jones, Braveheart, Shakespeare in Love) and one which is actually crap (Ordinary People, Forrest Gump).

____________________________
"An inglorious peace is better than a dishonourable war" ~ John Adams

reply

Thanks; I agree there is a difference. I still find Tom Jones to be an excellent film and a choice of which the Academy can be proud.

And I don't think it won over Fellini's 8-1/2. As an Italian-language film, that would have been competing in the Best Foreign Language category.

reply