MovieChat Forums > Tom Jones (1963) Discussion > was 1963 so long ago?

was 1963 so long ago?

posted 17 years ago by bluegull417-2
6 replies | jump to latest

only people from that era will know why this film won. the times and events were joy and sorrow, fear of the bomb and the swinging 60's were just starting.
JFK was on the mind when the oscars for 1963 films were won. i was 14 and was able to see a film condemned by the legion of decency and it was the funniest and sexiest film for its time for me. there would be more to come. unless you saw this in a movie theater you did not see TOM JONES.

[–] Prismark10 12 years ago

Only by viewing this film in the context of the time it was released can one appreciate what a talked about movie this was.

Its that man again!!

[–] rrb 12 years ago

Sorry to burst your balloon, but I saw this movie as a kid years after it was released, and I loved it.

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]

[–] mdonln 8 years ago

Prismark10 says > Only by viewing this film in the context of the time it was released can one appreciate what a talked about movie this was.

That can't be true but I certainly do understand the point you're trying to make. I didn't have to be around at the time to know that things were very different in the early sixties. Those of us seeing the movie for the first time may not find the movie quite as shocking as the sixties audiences would have but we can see; especially if we've seen a lot of older movies, that it was a departure from other movies of its time.

Still, Tom Jones is a good movie. I would never argue that context is unimportant but I believe a good movie is a good movie regardless of when it's seen. Movies, as life, deal with humans interacting with each other. As different and evolved as we may think we are today, we, as a race of people, have not really changed that much. We still deal with the same issues people have always dealt with and will continue to deal with throughout time. The biggest difference is we have different ways in which we interact and most of us have a wider range of people with whom we can make contact.

If the shock value of the sixties was the only thing going for the movie it would not have stood the test of time. All these years later, new audiences are still discovering and enjoying the movie because it's a good movie. It may not be in theaters but, fortunately, we have cable. Had it aired on network TV the movie would have been so hacked up and edited, both for time and content, it would likely have been an entirely different movie; one that probably would not have made much sense or been as interesting.

Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]

[–] Mustang_Ed 9 years ago

Compared to what our society and culture are like today, 1963 was a very innocent time. For a wonderful glimpse back to the way we were, enjoy watching this movie and remember that this was extremely sexy for audiences in that era.

[–] Venus-25 9 years ago

If that's true it's pitiable. This is a great film. Where is the uncut blu-ray version?

I think the silent-movie opening captured the point at which the humor in this story could be appreciated by a modern audience. True, this may have been made in an era where a period-costume film could get away with things that one in modern dress couldn't but that is part of this film's appeal. Not to mention that it's one of the best adaptations ever with a perfect cast.

The Fabio Principle: Puffy shirts look best on men who look even better without them.