Talos = terrifying. Brilliant FX, miles ahead of the time. Just watch Clash Of The Titans which was filmed 18 years later, the FX are truly inferior!
That's just it: It WAS NOT "ahead of the time"! That was our wonderful effects back then, and this is Ray Harryhausen's masterpiece! It's actually insulting to act as if CGI can hope to recapture this sort of magic.
No. They threw this aside for their "superior" computer stuff, which rarely reaches the RH level. Jim Danforth also could do some good work. Willis O'Brien's legacy lived on through them. I hope that, somewhere out there, are young artists who decide to master stop motion for when people are fed up with the shoddy CGI in most films. It's strange that "Jurassic Park" holds up, but "state-of-the-art" CGI is extremely poor, cartoonish and/or grainy-looking.
Again, Ray Harryhausen was OF his time. It insults him to say otherwise.
Remember: By the time he did "Clash of the Titans", he was a much older man. It's phenomenal that he did what he did in that film. It certainly makes the "remake" look dreadful, with all of its millions of dollars looking shoddy and uninteresting. Harryhausen's Medusa is so much more powerful though they obviously tried to imitate her (snake tail instead of legs, for one thing).
This 1963 film is the peak for this craftsman. However, even his weaker work is better than what we get nowadays. Have you watched the Sinbad movies: "Golden Voyage" 10 years after and "Eye of the Tiger" 14 years later?
*** The trouble with reality is there is no background music. ***
reply
share