Second part hommage to Antonioni?
Most people do not seem to like the second part all that much. It is filmed in a style that is not looking like your usual De Sica film. It's cool, distant, drained of colour (especially compared to the warm colours in part 1), the people are cold, self-occupied, not connecting... I wonder if De Sica was intending this to be an hommage to Antonioni?
share