MovieChat Forums > Children of the Damned (1964) Discussion > Movie is pretty good, has its moments, b...

Movie is pretty good, has its moments, but is _so_ flawed


[SPOILERS, obviously]

This film wanted to have it both ways, in terms of the origins of the children. Were they "mutations"? Or were they "children of aliens"? it seemed like in the film, the mutation theory was proffered. yet, they made a big deal that none of the children had any fathers: these were all virgin births. plus, all the children were the same age. plus, they were each suspiciously of different major nations. all this made it seem to be irrefutable evidence as to some sort of plan. these coincidences are introduced to heighten the mystery, but they are never explained or resolved.

With the innocence (or not) of the children, the movie wanted to have it both ways, also. they are "just" children. yet, they're children who are murdering all over the place. Don't forget: from the very beginning, Paul was controlling his mother. And when she threatened him, he tried to murder her by having her walk into traffic. All the pleadings of Llewellyn to show compassion seems to forget this event and others.

Plot hole: if these children are so smart and don't want to be interfered with, why do they reveal their massive intelligence and other powers in the first place? They eventually disobey their elders and go off alone; how much easier would it just be to bide their time, pretend to be "average" and not risk exposure?

Plot hole: what the *beep* was that machine the children had in the church? why do they need it for protection when they can just use their minds? and how did they construct it when they had not been out of the church at all prior to the machines appearance?

Plot hole: Paul never talks. The director makes a big deal that Paul never talks and Paul's always using mind-controlled Susan Elliot to talk for him. Then, for the first time he does talk... it's just to order Susan to stay in her room. I thought this was a tremendous waste. You build up all that anticipation with his constant silence; you could have had a huge emotional payoff if you actually had him say something important for his first utterance. Not a plot hole, but a huge directorial blunder.

And the ending. Such a cop-out. Oops, a dropped screwdriver sets off the entirety of the attack at once and it cannot be stopped. Those damned screwdrivers!

This movie had such potential. When you see the children gathering each other and walking together, or when Mi Ling quietly says "We're stronger together"-- that was damned scary! This movie promised alot and, in the end, it just didn't deliver.

reply

yet, they made a big deal that none of the children had any fathers: these were all virgin births.


I think that was just inspired by the birth of christ who also had to die despite being a saviour. Also it was shorthand to tell us these kids are special.

With the innocence (or not) of the children, the movie wanted to have it both ways, also. they are "just" children. yet, they're children who are murdering all over the place. Don't forget: from the very beginning, Paul was controlling his mother. And when she threatened him, he tried to murder her by having her walk into traffic. All the pleadings of Llewellyn to show compassion seems to forget this event and others.


Plot hole: if these children are so smart and don't want to be interfered with, why do they reveal their massive intelligence and other powers in the first place? They eventually disobey their elders and go off alone; how much easier would it just be to bide their time, pretend to be "average" and not risk exposure?


For as smart as they were they were still limited by the experiences they had and clearly they were still childlike in that aspect. The humans in the film did not think twice about using them to gain advantage over other nations. Adults who should have know better killed on of them and feared them so much they wanted them dead. The children listened to the psychologist and went back to their embassies and realized just how power hungry and paranoid people were.

By the end they grew a little and realized by the end that they had to die to save humanity from themselves.

Plot hole: what the *beep* was that machine the children had in the church? why do they need it for protection when they can just use their minds? and how did they construct it when they had not been out of the church at all prior to the machines appearance?


Sonic wave machine. Guessing that their mind control is limited to one at a time eg. the Russian girl controlled one to distract the other. With the machine they would not be overwhelmed by numbers.

They banged it up with random crap in the church.

And the ending. Such a cop-out. Oops, a dropped screwdriver sets off the entirety of the attack at once and it cannot be stopped. Those damned screwdrivers!


I think that deliberate that just as the adults are coming around and there is hope... all plans go to *beep* due to a simple tool like a screwdriver. It highlights how we cannot be trusted with even that never mind what the intellect of the children might create.

reply

I enjoy the movie as well, but I strongly prefer the first one.

reply

I found the movie boring and pretentious. But I'm glad others liked it.

reply

I like it but agree with Horror2.
The first one with the wonderful George Saunders was GREAT.

reply