I thought this film was very artistic, but I just didn't care for the style. I do, however, have a liking for non-Hollywood directors, and I'm guessing most of you are non-Hollywood types as well. So, plain & simple, what artistic directors can you suggest who are not in the same style as Godard (New Wave)?
My favorites are
Werner Herzog Wim Wenders Béla Tarr Takeshi Kitano Milos Forman Peter Greenaway (sometimes... when he's not annoying) Orson Welles JP Jeunet/Marc Caro Krzysztof Kieslowski Emir Kusturica
***EDIT***
Hey, I don't mean to exclude Godard fans from this thread. Despite what my title implies, I'm mainly asking all of you what directors you can suggest that share Godard's artistic talent but maybe with a different style. That way I can expand my cinematic horizons & perhaps return to Godard later when I'm ready for it. Thanks
Noone else is even in the vicinity!!! Then there is a list of favourites (Godard, Visconti and a few more are very close to make that list):
Robert Aldrich Woody Allen Vittorio De Sica Sam Fuller Werner Herzog Alfred Hitchcock Krzysztof Kieslowski Stanley Kubrick Akira Kurosawa Sidney Lumet Jean-Pierre Melville Sam Peckinpah Roman Polanski Jean Renoir Bo Widerberg Fred Zinnemann
- not so surprising - we're on a Godard-film board ;-) However: Godard and Antonioni both started out as filmcritics, but as personalities they're poles apart. Godard is a genius, he's outspoken, flamboyant, he likes to try new things, experiment, improve, teach others lessons, etc. - Antonioni is a genius, too, but he speaks more or less entirely through images and films. It's hard to say how much Godard contributed with his words, his criticism, his cooperation with others, but as far as the films themselves are concerned, as far as the language of cinema is concerned, I must disagree... The L'Avventura - La Notte - L'Eclisse trilogy itself was more innovative and grounbreaking than anything Godard has made.
And, btw, I didn't say I don't like the Vivre sa vie - I do, I just wrote the list anyway.
And, btw, I didn't say I don't like the Vivre sa vie - I do, I just wrote the list anyway.
Heh, yeah sorry for the misleading thread title (see my update to post #1). Thanks for the suggestions, everyone. That's what I'm looking for.
Oddly enough, we seem to share a lot of the same favourites. Why then am I having trouble with Godard? Fellini, for that matter, has always been tough for me to digest. Maybe I can ease into hardcore New Wave by first watching some crossover films.
reply share
I didn't hate this film the way I hated Week End, but I didn't love it. I think that it started out strongly in the first three or four scenes, but weakened as the story progressed and I couldn't feel more for the character, the way I did with Cléo de 5 à 7, even as she went through such ordeals in her life. Anyway, my favorite directors are, more or less:
Robert Altman Hayao Miyazaki
Woody Allen Sidney Lumet Akira Kurosawa Howard Hawks Francis Ford Coppola Fred Zinnemann Federico Fellini
Just us, the cameras, and those wonderful people out there in the dark!
What exactly do you mean when you say you respect Godard's artistic talent, but didn't care for the style? With Godard, so much of what he has to say as an artist is inherent in the style. What was left for you to appreciate if you didn't like his presentation? Or was it more of, wow that's really different & original and I can see something there but it kind of alienates me?
As for myself, I love Godard. While this was not one of my favorites, I saw it again recently and got more into it. I don't really like the opening where the characters' backs are to the camera and I'm not sure what he's trying to achieve when he constantly moves the camera side-to-side during a conversation later in the film. Otherwise, I find the style very engaging. My favorite scene is the one in which Anna Karina dances around the pool lounge by herself as everyone ignores her; I've come to realize that, unlike certain other Godard films, you can't really appreciate this one by admiring its surface (a film like Band of Outsiders wears its mood on its sleeve, and its style and substance are almost one and the same). There's much more there and you have to dig for it so in that sense it's more like an Antoinioni picture, though in most other ways it's not.
Antonioni, Ozu, and Bresson are all considered difficult directors, all in very different ways from Godard (and each other) so any of them would be worth checking out if you want to "expand your horizons." I think Blow-Up, Tokyo Story, or Pickpocket are some of their relatively more accessible films so you may want to start there. Good luck.
(And as for Godard, he seems to me a very visceral filmmaker; either you connect with him or you don't -- but he's got a lot of different films so try a few more before you decide)
Or was it more of, wow that's really different & original and I can see something there but it kind of alienates me?
Yep, that sums it up for me. It's like music; I can appreciate the talent & originality of certain musicians (say Kenny G on saxophone) but the style (smooth jazz) doesn't connect with me at all. So this thread is kind of like "Do you know of any other good sax players who don't play smooth jazz?"
I think what alienates me from Godard is that sometimes I get the feeling that he's going out of his way to be unusual, which I find distracting. For example, you mentioned the opening scene of the characters' backs. This bizarre scene is hammered so hard that (to me) it loses its subtlely and instead becomes gimmicky. A lot of rebellious artists tread this fine line.
Take the film Russian Ark (a 2-hr film shot entirely in one continuous cut). It's a good movie, but it's obvious that the director set out to make "a film that was shot entirely in one continuous cut". And so you become distracted from the story. Style tramples on substance. Contrast this with Werckmeister Harmoniak, a 2-hr film shot in ~20 cuts. The scenes are still very long (5-10 mins each) which accomplishes the same mood without distracting the audience from the script.
But a lot of it may also be my (lack of) familiarity with odd movies. I suppose if I were already acclimated to strange camera angles, then this wouldn't be so hard to digest. But I prefer to go into every movie as if I'm an alien from outer space watching my very first film. Does it appeal to me or not? With Vivre sa vie the answer is no, but I can still see that a lot of skill & artistry went into it, so I'll keep trying.
Some good suggestions here. My video store carries a few Antonioni titles (Il Grido & Profession: Reporter... unfortunately they don't have Blowup) so maybe I'll try that next. Maybe I'll even check out Band of Outsiders based on your description: "style and substance are almost one and the same"--that's the kind of stuff that appeals to me. Thanks!
All Godard movies have idiosyncratic directorial choices, but in his best films these choices seem brilliant and exciting. Actually, I felt the same way about the opening shot of Vivre sa vie so we may end up having similar taste in Godard films. Band of Outsiders is just a lot of fun, and there's an infamous dance sequence which is great.
I love this movie, one of my favourites from Godard, who is one of my favourite directors. Some of my favourites: Buñuel, Godard, Altman, Fellini, Welles, Mizoguchi, Resnais, Teshigahara, Hawks, Huston, Polanski, Herzog, Varda, Greenaway, Keaton... I could go on forever...
Ok, I hate it when I'm bored or if the movie is just painful in its stupidity (Boondock Saints) but there is no GENRE that I will simply avoid, and (like you) I like everything from silent comedy to classic Hollywood to big heavy Japanese melodrama to uber-stylish French New Wave and so on :D