I would understand why you would such a view and I don't really think you're stupid to think so. But then, Godard never wanted everyone to love and admire (and look for the depth like you said) in all his work - or that's how I would hypothesize.
This is a remarkable effort to make us think how Nana takes her journey to prostitution and how her confidence to be in films slowly traverse into something more real. The 12 chapters show the development of her fate. I loved how Raul was introduced, for instance and many other minute turning points in her life. Each chapter is a stepping stone to her end. I would recommend you re-visit the philosophy discussion with the old man at the cafe if you have any interest to give Godard's his due & fair respect for this work. If nothing works, don't you admire the photography, the beautifully placed jumpcuts (The shooting scene), impressively deductive editing?
At times, you really don't have to look for deep meanings. Vivre Se Vie is not a deep film as that seems to be your disappointment. but it's not quite. Its beautiful nonetheless.
I personally loved it. I wouldn't call it Godard's best but its definitely satisfying for me. Beautiful work, and Anna Karina was stunning and extremely impressive.
reply
share