MovieChat Forums > Two for the Seesaw (1962) Discussion > Can't believe there isn't more discussio...

Can't believe there isn't more discussion about this film

posted 14 years ago by MitchumsGal
4 replies | jump to latest

Mitchum and MacLaine are magnetic in this. One of Mitchum's best roles. It's inconceivable to me that he was considered cast against type for this kind of part. And it's a shame it hasn't been readily available. I found it through other means but checking today you can get it on Amazon. Apparently they have a deal with MGM and make DVD-R copies of their older titles for those who order. Seems like an odd arrangement but if you are looking for it in a US-playable format that is the way to go. More people should see this film!

******************
You're gonna make me lonesome when you go....

[–] mflint22 14 years ago

mixed-berry: I absolutely agree with you. This is a great film and it is a shame that it is not available on DVD. It is possible to vote for it be on DVD on the Turner Classic movie website www.tcm.com

I believe I must have seen this film as a child, before I could really pick up on the nuances, since it has such a strong nostalgic feel to me, and I remembered some of the lines, though not the arc of the plot or the denoument.

I was totally captivated by the film: the acting of Shirley McLain and Robert Mitchum and their chemistry, the characterization, dialogue, cinematography, and music all blending into a spellbinding, poignant two hours.

For a film that's almost 50 years old it doesn't have a dated feel at all...not even the clothes...

[–] Ripshin 13 years ago

Ah, the "denoument"........or denouement? If you're going to play the grand piano......

[–] csu16387 12 years ago

A gem... the chemistry between Mitchum and MacLaine bursts through the screen (due to their off-screen relationship).

I agree that more people should know about this film.

"I think we've out-sophisticated ourselves out of some of the pleasures of movies."

[–] pt100 11 years ago

Yes, it's a terrific film. There are so many fine aspects to it: acting, directing, cinematography. I'm also surprised that it has gotten so little good discussion.

Some folks have called Mitchum's performance stiff or lackluster. But that is partly because of the script; and also he is supposed to be a lawyer from Nebraska, so naturally his *character* would seem a bit stiff in contrast to the worldly, free-spirited New Yorker.

MacLaine is absolutely luminous and energetic--perfect for the role--and is at the top of her game. And the camera really loved her in this film.