MovieChat Forums > Lolita (1962) Discussion > The Case for Nabokov (author of the book...

The Case for Nabokov (author of the book)


Vladimir Nabokov escaped the Russian Revolution a hundred years ago, so there are several stories in the news.

Author of this article is also Russian exile. She notes SJWs have been defaming Nabokov in recent years.

https://quillette.com/2019/05/06/the-case-for-nabokov/

Vladimir Nabokov, whose 120th anniversary we mark this Spring, remains one of the 20th Century’s most acclaimed and enduring writers. He keeps turning up on various Greatest–Books lists, often more than once—for the novels Lolita and Pale Fire, as well as his autobiography, Speak, Memory. And yet in this day and age, Nabokov is clearly a “problematic” fave. Not only is he a dead white male of privileged pedigree, but the novel that made him a literary star is, in the scolding words of feminist essayist Rebecca Solnit, “a book about a white man serially raping a child.” What’s more, Nabokov, a Russian-born refugee from both Communism and Nazism who died in 1977, made no secret of his contempt for both progressive political causes and literature as a means to advance them. He was politically incorrect avant la lettre.
___

There is, of course, a great deal to Lolita besides the subject of adult-child sex. It’s a tribute to America as well as a biting satire of suburban life, trendy intellectualism and much else. It’s an exploration of human consciousness and its relationship to reality—truth and fantasy, deception and self-deception, memory and illusion—which were constant themes in Nabokov’s work. And there is, of course, much to Nabokov’s literary legacy besides Lolita, though Lolita may well be his best book as well as his most famous.

reply

Yeah, well, I'm not the only one who tried to read "Lolita" and gave up because kiddie porn makes me ill.

I understand that other people can look past that and get a great deal of enjoyment out of it, and fine, whatever floats your boat. But it's still a repulsive book.

reply

I'm not an "SJW" for thinking pedophilia is wrong.

"Adult-Child Sex."

There is no such thing!

Call it what it is!

This is a story that should have never existed and it's existence exposes a large amount of people's disgusting beliefs.

To call the basic core of the plot in Lolita as a representation of anything else, American life and suburban living is glossing over something completely immoral.

It should have never been as famous as it was. Should have been forgotten. Or even more controversial than it already was. To have discussions about everything wrong with it instead of concentrating on such a sadistic main character.

reply

Nabokov would have done better to keep studying butterflies. There's a species of Arizona butterfly named after him, saw some earlier this year. Butterflies and the study of butterflies make the world a better place, books about pedos do not.

reply

The joke is on you. None of Lolita is real. It's a fiction told by an unreliable narrator.
I'm sorry you think black is black and white is white.
The world of ideas is not a simple place, which is how you want it to be.

reply

Literature is fundamentally unimportant. No, really, it is.

Environmental sciences, now there's an important subject!

reply

There are millions of novels, short stories, plays, television series episodes, and films about murder, the most repulsive act one human can do to another. Enjoying those stories does not mean we approve of murder. The reader or viewer of "Lolita" isn't intended to approve of a middle-aged man's intimate relationship with a teenage girl. The point of it is the complexity of human emotions and psychological pathology, which is interesting as well as entertaining.

reply

Yes, I read murder mysteries, but murder mysteries always offer more than a spending the entire book inside the head of a killer. And that's what was unbearable about trying to read "Lolita", spending that much time inside the head of a monster. And a crushing snob.

Frankly, I think that Lit majors don't enjoy it much either, they just feel honor-bound to shock the bourgeoisie by defending it, and claiming to love it. Fine, go ahead and defend it, I'm not one for book-burning, but I still don't believe that all the people who say they love it actually enjoy reading it.

reply

I only just learned that Lolita is the meaning of the song lyric from The Police "Don't Stand So Close To Me" - 'that book by Nabokov'

reply

Yes. Great song. Whenever there's any mention of Lolita I only think of that song and that line. I refuse to read the book

reply

"I refuse to read the book"

What, you interpret this work of art as pedophilia advocacy?

reply

Sad that you see it as a work of art. I thought you'd be in agreement with me. I can't respect any opinion that views Lolita as a good book. So it is well written. That's all it's got going for it. "Well written" spewing out trash.

(Edit: I thought you were the same person I responded to but I realized you are not.)

reply

Try reading it and you might then know what you're talking about.

reply

I'm not saying I'd never try reading a small portion of it, but my reluctance is so strong I don't think I could bring myself to.

I know exactly what I'm talking about. I don't have to read to know. I have read many reviews about Lolita. The reason for that was because a few years ago when I found out about the story, I didn't understand the reason it was considered a classic and frankly I still don't. Reading people's reasons of dislike/like for the book gave me a perspective that it is an intentionally conflicting story, but still a bad one. I don't see it as "advocacy" but a piece of literature nearly glorifying such a disturbing subject matter and became famous for the wrong reasons. Not that there could've been any right ones really.

reply

"when I found out about the story, I didn't understand the reason ..."
Right there indicates you have no ground for commenting that you understand this book at all.
There is no "glorifying such disturbing subject matter."
If all you want is simple bromides about right and wrong, stick to the 700 Club and stay the hell away from more thoughtful forums.
Jesus Christ ! Do you need someone like me to tell you the myriad gradations of the power of attraction and how art can express this in a thoughtful manner?
But no ! This must not exist ! No thoughtful artist can address the vagaries of human experience w/o gaining scorn from the reactionary crowd screaming - it's bad, it's bad !
It's just a fucking book, and well written, and not "glorifying" anything.
Takes a very small mind to jump to this conclusion, and I wonder if this is some preoccupation of your own for you to object so much.

reply

So simply just because I don't have the same opinion as you, you think I have a small mind. I never said anything like that about you and it's sad you feel the need to insult me. It seems you've gone to many lengths of defending it. I said I didn't understand. When I was much younger. I still took the time to read about the story itself. You can't call that close minded. It doesn't mean I can't comment on the basic plot and summary. I even said I might give some of it a chance, but I won't openly seek out and buy a copy. I enjoy plenty of stories that aren't all black and white.

reply

You don't have to read to know? That puts you in line with 1.8 billion not really that literate Muslims who want Salman Rushdie to be killed.

reply

What does this have to do with anything? Try again, or please don't respond to my comments.

reply

Just the advice to read a book BEFORE you condemn it...

reply

I'm allowed to give my opinion of the book without reading it. I still know the content of the characters, the setting, the meaning, and the conflicts. There isn't much point in me reading it anyways, I'm sure I'd still feel the same way. You could say that about anything else. Yet you're specifically talking about this story itself. I'm sure there have been movies/books you condemned before ever watching/reading them.

reply