MovieChat Forums > Dr. No (1962) Discussion > I never understood this movie

I never understood this movie


This may be the first James Bond 007 movie of all of them and is seen as a template of how the series should be, but I couldn't understand a few things:

1. Why is Bond introduced to the villain just 20 minutes before the end of the movie? In later Bond movies, they meet earlier, some movies MUCH earlier.

2. Why bother with the lame dragon disguise for the tracked vehicle with the flamethrower? I would think someone sooner or later would see it for what it is, not be superstitious like the rest of the locals.

3. Why were Bond and the girl treated so nicely by the Asian women tending to their needs when they were in the villain's lair after they were captured? And why would one of them help Bond when the girl was chained up, ready to be drowned in that pool?

4. What was the point of the nuclear reactor? I heard something about "toppling" American missiles for some reason, but it seemed silly that when the reactor was "ready to fire", a small satellite dish appeared - was THAT the weapon? How could radioactivity result in a radio beam that knocks over missiles? It honestly sounds to me that if Ian Fleming wrote this, he had no idea about such things, and was making up pure fantasy based on sci-fi pulp novels of the 1950s, when such things mostly don't belong in Bond at all.

reply

yes

reply

That single word does not answer any of my questions.

reply

why

reply

1. It’s called buildup

2. Back in the 1960’s those were good special effects. The “dragon” to the characters looks a lot more like a dragon than it does to the audience. Kind of like how today we know that a tidal wave in The Day After Tomorrow is a special effect but the characters think it’s real

3. Dr. No was at least civilized, it’s classy to give your mortal enemy a bed, food, clean clothes, etc. And Bond grabbed her arm and threatened her life, that’s why she showed him where Honeychilde was.

4. I’m guessing the toppling satellite ran on Nuclear Power. I mean Crab Key has to get power somehow, I guess a nuclear reactor was more efficient than your typical power plant.

reply

"Back in the 1960’s those were good special effects. The “dragon” to the characters looks a lot more like a dragon than it does to the audience. Kind of like how today we know that a tidal wave in The Day After Tomorrow is a special effect but the characters think it’s real"

What special effects? The vehicle was NOT a special effect, just an ordinary flamethrower tank with two lights on top and paint on the front to resemble the muzzle of a dragon. Anyone could see that. Only a moronic FOOL would think it was anything other than that. This is why I hate local stupid superstitious types.

"I’m guessing the toppling satellite ran on Nuclear Power. I mean Crab Key has to get power somehow, I guess a nuclear reactor was more efficient than your typical power plant."

WHAT "toppling satellite"? WE NEVER SAW ONE. All we saw was that little satellite dish poke up out of the chimney or whatever and that was that, we never saw any satellite in orbit. This is what doesn't make sense. Was the satellite dish ITSELF the weapon? That tiny little fucking thing? I SEVERELY DOUBT IT.

reply

All I can say is I tried to answer your questions, I’m sorry it wasn’t enough.

reply

I appreciate your replies, it's the movie's fault for not explaining things.

reply

Very simple. The answers to each of your questions is its a plot hole

reply