Lesbian Heroine?


It seemed to me pretty clear that the heroine was a lesbian. She starts off riding in the car with two women who drag race men, she tells the doctor repeatedly that she has no interest in men and never has -- and keeps away from her lecherous neighbor, she's more than willing to have her landlady come in when she's half-dressed, and there are lots of other little clues along the way. I saw the dance at the end as being about her being sucked into zombie-ish heterosexuality -- and running from it.

After watching the interviews with the writer and director, I was surprised that no one said anything about that (even though Kansans might not use the word "lesbian" out loud. :-) ) Am I reading too much into this or did other people think this too?

reply

Sorry, youre reading to much into it. If the director intended for her to be lesbian im sure they would have included some, altough very subtile, scene were she is drawn towards other woman. She is just very insecure, or something, reminds me very much about the protagonist in Repulsion.

reply

She reminded me of the chick in REPULSION too. Not necessarily GAY just not interested in sex at all. She says to the doctor that she's never been with anyone and is just fine that way. If she was a lesbian wouldnt she want to be with a woman???
What I dont understand is how she says she's never been attracted to anyone ever and has always felt that "not belonging" feeling. Even BEFORE the accident???

So I say Mary is just a frigid asexual.

LOUD & PROUD HAL LOVER
LIVING IN THE PAST
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze6spdi/index.html

reply

My impression is that her lack of sexual interest was a feature of her loss of soul as a dead person. She didn't remember feelings of sexual attraction and desire natural to the living. It was another hint to the audience that she was not alive.

reply

Exactly. I'm not sure how this was missed. It's what the whole movie is about. She out and out said she didn't want to be around any people and couldn't remember if she had always been that way (implying she only began feeling that way after she died).

reply

It's been years since I've seen this film and it has stayed with me all this time. Actually saw this before I ever saw Repulsion. I was immediately reminded of the protagonist in Carnival. She is beyond asexual, she is anhedonic.

reply

I agree with the first poster, because any interperation is valid. Great art can definitly be personal, and that estimation of Mary Henry makes sense to me - That actually adds a layer to the film that I never noticed before. Damn, I'm gonna go watch my gorgeous 2 disc Criterion set again!

reply

Lesbian Heroine? Tough sell for me. I just finished watching it, the thought came across my mind regarding her sexuality. Yet, I could not justify it outright. Sex and sexuality does not seem to be the issue being driven here. The lecherous neighbor seems to neither prove nor disprove which way she swings, because he is just fairly unattractive for obvious reasons, not because he is a male.

Sex seems to be the last angle to view this film; Mary seems to want the fellowship of anyone. Then again, I tend to try to avoid using Queer Theory as my first analyzation tool.

reply

You are quite wrong about great art being slack enough for personal interpretations.

reply

The thing absolutely everyone misses about this is it is a Mormon cult horror film. This all by itself is shocking! The fact Hervey got any money at all to make it is almost beyond belief. I was told that he said the money for it was paid out for a series of oral hygiene flix, but he pocketed it for this.

What is the meaning of meaning?

reply

Bathwater of the Gods -

I was just wondering why you say this is a Mormon cult horror film. I did not see anything in the film that referenced anything to do with the Mormon religion. Other than the fact that part of it was filmed in Utah, I don't see a connection. Please elaborate.

Thank you,
kaylynn36

reply

[deleted]

I don't think "any interpretation is valid" if the writer disagrees with it. Or maybe every interpretation is valid, but some are just dead wrong. There are some nuances that rise to the top in the light of scrutiny but when it has to do with something so fundamental as a person's actions or direct motive, then you really have to go through the author. What I mean is let's say X kills Y because someone kills X's friend Z. It is revealed that Y did not kill Z. Now whether this is fact or left open ended is completely up to the writer (do they choose to reveal it?). But when it comes to whether X really killed Y for this reason is anybody's guess. That is what's known as an indirect motive. It is that which is partially (but mainly) hidden and it is a great part of what is known as the iceberg theory. Sexual orientation is a part of the former - it has to go through the author and as someone else here has posted, it is not the author's intent.

reply

I certainly don't think that because Mary is riding in a car with other girls it is reasonable to assume she is a lesbian -- if that view is valid, then the fact that the guys who engage in a race with the girls are also riding in a car with no companions of the another gender would imply that they must be gay as well. And what would it say about the lecherous young guy boarding (until Mary shows up)in a house with only an old woman? Some kind of Oedipal relationship? And once you begin this kind of out-of-thin-air kind of analysis, you have to find some kind of psycho-babble explanation for why Mary wants to "play an organ" in a church -- what does she see when she looks at those "phallic" pipes of varying sizes as she plays -- barefoot!-- aha! a foot fetishist's delight! -- in the church! until music reaches a "climax" in tones that are "blasphemous" -- ???!!!
Once this sort of "interpretation" starts, there is no end -- anything can mean anything in the eyes (or imagination) of a beholder. Whether it is logical, or motivated by demonstrable evidence from within the work of "art," or is in keeping with the probable human motivations of its own time period instead of forced upon it by the mores of our own period --- ah, there's the problem.
No, I don't think there's any reason -- within the movie itself -- to see Mary as a lesbian -- she is devoid of emotional connections with people because of what becomes clear at the end of the movie. In her situation -- which she only gradually grasps -- sexuality is of little significance, ultimately of no importance at all.

reply

[deleted]

obviously your friend was hot for lesbians. If he didnt concioussly intend to make her a lesbian his subconciouss mind did.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

That was actually a huge question that was often asked back when this film was released. It was unintentional... her uninterest with sex was merely to help enhance her character's struggle.

-- GarradAM

reply

when yer ded, its hard to maintain much interst in much of anything

even hot cateye-glass lesbean sex, mournfully enough

reply