MovieChat Forums > Combat! (1962) Discussion > Combat! vs Tour Of Duty

Combat! vs Tour Of Duty


I am TRYING to watch Tour Of Duty (1987) for the first (and last) time. I am having a huge problem with the acting and the writing. The Sgt act all nervous, twitch and jittery. He is constantly loosing it. One show had him totally screwed up in the head where his mean doubted his abilities. Way too heavily flawed man to be a Platoon Sgt. Not anyone I would want to serve with or watch on TV.

In other words, he as a far from Sgt, Saunders as possible.

The scripts are awful. They are full of tropes that defy all good writing techniques. Everything is black and white, right and wrong. Any "bad" character is so ridiculously written so he seems like a caricature rather than any resemblance to a real person.

Combat! has scripts that were full of believable grey areas of human beahviour. Sure there were tropes, but often not. I thought the episode where the soldier was reunited with his French doctor father who was a collaborator was amazing.

Now, for Tour Of Duty, the show runners hired a lib-tard director who openly stated his sole goal was to discredit the Vietnam War effort....even if it meant discrediting the men involved. Disgusting.

I know this is the discussion for Combat, but I am watching both shows at the same time. I cant even get through season 1 of Tour Of Duty. I want to point out all the reasons why Combat! is almost totally opposite (and GREAT) to Tour Of Duty.

Oliver Stone is also a lib tard, but Platoon was still a masterpiece in spite of its anti war message. Tour Of Duty took the idea from Stone and desecrated everything in the end. Disgusting.

They have great helo usage and footage. SOME of the battle scenes are OK. But much of the firing of M-16's are NOT aimed, but from the hip which is ridiculous.

Also, 99% of the M-16 firing is done on full auto which was ONLY the case in actual war when a squad or platoon was ambushed. After a mag or two on full auto, the soldiers (or Marines) HAD to go to semi auto AIMED fire because it is more effective AND they had just so much ammunition!! So there is that.

Obviously, No one listened to any of the hired Military advisers. They probably all quit when the director blew then off and shot battle scenes the way he wanted.

I really wanted to rant. I feel better now. Thanks.

reply

WoW Tour of Duty.. Another of my favorite series. Any input where I can pick that up on FIOS NY?

reply

I can't recall that show at all. I don't think I watched much tv in the late 80's, other than music videos.

reply

Saunders had his moments of "losing it" too. Little Carousel was a good example.

Stg Anderson (TOD) was different from Saunders but I liked both series. Both had drama mixed with humor. Different Wars with different types of heroes.

I agree that Morrow was the better actor of the two, but make sure you watch the TOD episode Under Siege before you throw in the towel. This is one of the best of that series and Knox's Stg Anderson was very like Saunders in this episode.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0732296/combined#comment

Deep down, I'm pretty superficial.

reply

Hey folks.

It is hard for me to imagine a bigger Combat! fan than myself, and it has been my favorite TV show since 1962. In spite of that statement, I also thought Tour of Duty was a great show at the time.

I have been watching the Combat! episodes almost continuously since they were first aired in 1962, and I still enjoy them to this day. I have not had the opportunity to see Tour of Duty episodes since they originally aired, so I really do not know how I would judge them this many years later. I do suspect, however, they might also prove to be very good.

Best wishes,
Dave Wile


reply