MovieChat Forums > The Young Savages (1961) Discussion > John Frankenheimer said Dina Merrill was...

John Frankenheimer said Dina Merrill was the worst actress he'd ever wor


I was listening to Dina Merrill w/ Barbara Rush do a voice over narration on the TV movie "What Makes Sammy Run?", and Dina Merrill said that John Frankenheimer called her, "The worst actress I have ever worked with!" I deduced that this was the film that he was talking about (she said it was with Burt Lancaster). I haven't seen this movie, was she really that bad? I always found her to be one of the classiest (& classiest looking) actresses ever.

Barbara Rush intimated that maybe Dina had brushed off some advance from him. Dina (classy person that she apparently is in real life) kept silent. Like I said, I haven't seen this film. Was she really that bad, or did Frankenheimer just have a bug up his rear?

reply

I just finished her commentary on "Desk Set," where she spoke briefly about that experience. Apparently, it was Frankenheimer's way to choose an actor and pick on that actor during the shoot. They didn't get along and she declined the invitation to a memorial when Frankenheimer died. She said she had nothing nice to say about the man.

Sister, when I've raised hell, you'll know it!

reply

I finally got a chance to see this movie (The Young Savages), and Dina Merrill was not very good in it. I found this unusual, since I have liked her performance in everything else that I have seen her in, including the aforementioned "What Makes Sammy Run?". If Frankenheimer was attempting to "inspire" her with this abuse then I would say that he failed!

I'll end on this note: When Dina Merrill's father spoke did people REALLY listen?

reply

Her father was not E. F. Hutton, but her mother was Marjorie Merriwhether Post, the cereal heiress.

reply

Yes, he was her father. Read the IMDb notes about her.

reply

You're right; he was. I posted this before I looked it up. I should have remembered this detail because I once read the 1986 Barbara Hutton biography by C. David Heymann, but recalled that Mrs. Post had at least five husbands. I couldn't remember that E.F. Hutton was Dina's father not her step-father. However, I have to agree with the Director John Frankenheimer that Merrill was not a good actress, just a classy, beautiful socialite. No wonder they typecast her. She was okay in Butterfield 8, but next to Elizabeth Taylor (in the worst role of her career, I might add) she seemed sub-mediocre. This made Taylor's below par performance as an upscale hooker shine brighter when she didn't deserve an Oscar, much less a nomination.

But: there have been even worse so-called actresses, namely Sue Lyon, Carole Lynley, and, I hate to say it, Ali MacGraw, who was too old (30!) for the part in Love Story but could still pass as a College co-ed. These days any thirty-year-old could play a college babe. The green-eyed, blonde Lyon is only tolerable in Lolita because she was so beautiful and her co-stars were some of the greatest talents in filmdom: James Mason, Shelley Winters, and Peter Sellers, all under the direction of the equally great Stanley Kubrick, who must have felt the tiresome compulsion to re-take many of Sue Lyon's scenes. I'm certain Frankenheimer saw the need to do the same during the filming of The Young Savages. But let's give Lyon the benefit of our doubts: she was barely fifteen when they filmed Lolita, while Merrill was a seasoned actress in her thirties.

Some of these performances are so awful to behold that they make even Linda Blair, a not very good actress either, look like a solid-gold Oscar nominee, which she once was (for 1973's biggest film The Exorcist). Blair was only fourteen at the time and lost the Best Supporting Actress Award that year (March 1974) to ten-year-old Tatum O'Neal for Paper Moon. Too bad neither actress has appeared in anything decent since O'Neal's A-list turn in the 1976 blockbuster The Bad News Bears.

As for Dina Merrill, she still looks great (much better than any other show-business woman in her age group with the exception of maybe Ann Blyth and Barbara Rush) and is still loaded to the gills. More power to her.

reply

Just saw her in Young Savages again, and I think you're being a little hard on her. Seems to me the role was typically flat ("typically," I mean, for many such "wife of guy who actually matters to the story" roles, especially in what is more or less a quasi-police procedural film), rather than there being anything particularly wrong with her acting. Just an opinion, of course, but she's certainly better than a lot of the stock-role actresses that were working in those days (not that you're disagreeing with that point in general, since you're not making any sweeping statements about her).

reply

I had never heard that Frankenheimer used the tactic of picking on an actor on the films he directed.I do know that its a well known fact that John Ford did this on his movies.Sometimes he had an ulterior motive regarding the actor & the performance he wanted to get out of them.Other times he was just being mean spirited for no reason.Both Ford & Frankenheimer were incredible directors,& I am a fan of their work.Not always a fan of the way they treated people.

reply

Dina sucked grape nuts, for sure, but so does Paris Hilton, which shows money can't buy a career in Hollywood in acting, only producing. So I suppose some saw something in Dina.


If you put me on ignore, then how can I notify you when I win the lottery?

reply

She played Lancaster liberal wife in the film. In real life no one was more liberal than Lancaster. He was actually from where the film was shot Italian Harlem. So was I I saw him a few times. He got his haircuts in the same barbershop where my father and I got ours. Russo I was a friend of his son Gregory Russo. At the time we were there their was not many liberals in that neighborhood

reply

Honestly, she's not that good in the movie.

reply