Hi Proofpoochie,
Well, I watched the VD DVD (try saying that three times) of KKVG last night, and here's my report. Oh, before writing this I went back after seeing the film and re-read the review on the Toho Kingdom link you gave me, and also compared the still he provided from the Toho and Universal prints, so I have those comments as well as the movie itself fresh in my mind.
First, yes, it is the 30th anniversary release. It'd been two years since I last watched it and frankly didn't remember the "30th" pre-credit notice. (By the way, 30th anniversary of what? What year was this anniversary? Are they talking about 1962, when KKVG was made? That's the only date for which a 30th anniversary of the studio itself would make sense.)
Anyway, I watched the film before going back to read the review, but I did notice most of the problems the reviewer describes. The aspects that struck me most were the somewhat faded or washed-out look of some scenes (I noticed this more in the second half of the movie than the first) and the brightness of some (not all) scenes. Also, in some places the color was clearly off -- the yellowing, and too-red credits, struck me (I'd forgotten he'd even mentioned these). Clearly, the studio seems to have tried too much color saturation in lieu of a proper picture restoration.
My memory from two years ago was of a not-great but acceptable print. Watching for details, and re-reading the review, make the problems more obvious.
Still, and maybe I'm not particular enough, while it's obvious that this film could use a good restoration job, I don't see that it's as bad as he or you do (though I think you're more adept at this kind of thing than I am). The problems I saw in the film were the same as described, but they didn't seem as prevalent, as all-pervasive, as his review implies. They turn up in portions of the film, not throughout, from my observation. (For example, while some colors looked "washed out" in some parts of the film, in others they appeared perfectly acceptable; also, while some scenes are clearly too bright, I didn't get this impression throughout the movie. Same with the complaint about random debris or other particulate elements on the film: sometimes, but not always.) This variableness in the picture is itself a problem, of course, but my point is none of the problems cited seemed to mark the film all the way through.
I thought the sound was fine (as did the reviewer). This disc also had some, not all, of the extras he described, namely all the theatrical trailers, all but one of which were repetitive -- each different, yet each save the one of the exact same scenes (some with more on-screen information, one full-screen and in black and white (!), one in dubbed English (!!) but not from the US release as its printing is all in Japanese). One trailer was somewhat different and did indeed have the music from The Mysterians and something else familiar which I couldn't quite place till I read the review again and realized it was from The Hidden Fortress. (I had only skimmed this part in my earlier reading.) None of the cast and other extras he mentions were on this disc, but they didn't sound very interesting.
Bottom line (1): I agree, this film needs major picture restoration, for all the reasons pointed out. Its quality is in this regard inferior to almost every other disc I've seen from VD out of Toho. If you'll recall I said last week that I remembered the picture from this film was below par, without recalling much in the way of specifics; well, the reviewer's points are all well-taken. Compared to virtually all the other DVDs I have from VD, which are almost all of excellent condition, this one is definitely not as good. However --
Bottom line (2): Despite the work needed to bring this picture back to its deserved condition, I don't see it as "ugly", as you put it -- "lackluster", your other word, is more like it. In general I found the picture clear and generally acceptable, with some of the softness the reviewer complained of but again nothing as poor as he makes out. The problems cited all exist but don't eviscerate the quality of the picture as the reviewer almost seems to feel. I guess I'm comparing this print with prints of some films that are genuinely of poor or quasi-atrocious quality. Compared to most typical studio-released DVDs, KKVG may be of lesser quality, but it's hardly the unmitigated, unwatchable disaster this reviewer implies.
Bottom line (3): The choice for the present is either an admittedly flawed but acceptable DVD of the original, vs. an allegedly pristine picture of the dubbed Americanized version. (I haven't seen the Universal DVD, don't want it and have no desire to get it.) Even the reviewer points out that the aspect ratio of the Toho DVD is correct, with no cropping of the picture as occurs on the Universal disc. Given this; the fact that the original is in its original language and well subtitled; that it's the complete film, uncut, unedited, and un-rearranged; that it lacks the inserted, boring and artificial American scenes, pointless American actors, and poor English dubbing; that it has the original, great Akira Ifukube score, most or all of which is missing from the US film; that the satiric subplot of the original is made clear and not eradicated into meaningless slapstick as in the American version; that the other elements, mainly the sound, are excellent; for all these and other reasons -- the fact that the Toho print is less than pictorially stellar is, nonetheless, to me infinitely preferable to having the Universal version, whose picture quality might be somewhat better (except for that cropping), but which is by every other measure a decidedly inferior and unacceptable hacked-up variation of this movie. Give us a better quality Toho original by all means, but for now, the choice between the original whose only fault is a not-terrific print, vs. the Americanized version with all its basic, unalterable and myriad drawbacks, is no choice at all.
By the way, I haven't seen the US variant in probably 25 years or more, and the main reason I was reluctant to buy the original was my feeling that the movie wasn't all that good. As I wrote in my review of the film on its site, I was pleasantly surprised by what I found in the Japanese. Having now seen it again, I like it even better...so I too would like to see it get a new, restored print. But the Universal cut is no substitute, better picture or not.
reply
share