MovieChat Forums > The Last Sunset (1961) Discussion > Reel work of garbage, check the shadows

Reel work of garbage, check the shadows


If you want to see a terrible western, rent this. Just watched it on cable and realized in the end why I hated it so. It is pretty pathetic. No one could or would hold back as Ms. Malone does about her predictable predicament with her ex-lover who is, well, you'll figure it out really quickly. But to really cap this off check the final five minutes.

Kirk tells Missy he'll be back just a few minutes after the sun goes down over that mountain -- move to seen of sun setting over mountain. He then takes the two minute walk back to the town square to meet Rock in a showdown...where it is exactly NOON! Check the shadows. They are squarely beneath everything and everyone. It is high NOON folks. Did we suddenly go backwards 7 hours in two minutes?

As the gun battle shapes up the shadows indicate it's about 2 p.m. They must have taken a lunch break here and instead of coming back the next day rushed to finish the film, or did they? Because at the end of the gun battle (approximately :30 later), it's High NOON again! OUCH! Either that or they shot the final scene and went back to a few minutes before the final moment to shoot it out of sequence. Nah, not these guys, must have waited a day to mis-time the shoot.

C'mon! And the acting was pretty poor for such a good cast too.

reply

Who cares?

reply

I don't care either. Robert Aldrich is one of my favorite directors.

Perhaps, this is why so many films are darkly filmed or filmed at night.

reply

brillpro sounds like someone who collects antique toilet seats cuz he loves the splinters!

Nothing is more beautiful than nothing.

reply

I've never seen the film, but stuff like you describes does tend to bother me alot.

So much so that I dedicated my signature to my belief that...




"It's just a movie" is no excuse for treating us like idiots!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwRqc0KSkJ0

reply

Thank you very much Robbmonster. Your comment is apprecaited. You are so right, because if we wanted to spend $10 today we want a quality film. This one never did it for me despite the cast.
bob

reply

I never even paid attention to shadows in detail or anything. I just looked at the sky and thought, "Wow, clear blue sky at sunset. Wasn't it pretty darkish just a minute ago?".

The film was shown in black and white on local TV a couple of years ago. Hadn't seen it before and liked it better then.

And, yes, Robert Aldrich is one of my favourite directors. But dang, shouldn't someone have noticed something wrong while shooting? It bothers me tremendously.

reply

Thanx Kerhonen, I appreciate you saw what I saw and while I too like Aldrich was just blown away by this aspect of the film. Too many good stars, and crew to waste on stupid stuff like that. Maybe they were upset at the studio bosses or something to try to rush the thing. Would really like to know the backstory on this as I feel there IS some kind of good story there.

reply

[deleted]

NO not at all. That was just one of the really bad flaws in what was not that entertaining of a movie. When the director, even a great one, can't get the basics right it demeans the entire movie and takes it away from what it was intended to be. And idiot isn't in my vocabulary as I wouldn't demean myself to calling someone out on an internet board. I'd rather just be right than be stupid or childish. Thank Brillpro

reply

It would demean you to call someone an idiot, but evidently not to call them stupid. You're an idiot.

reply

Back in that time period, it seemed like everything was filmed just whenever the weather allowed. There was no night filming. Filters were used. Now talk about fakey......big puffy white clouds and strong shadows for night scenes. When I was young I never noticed this stuff. When it entered my consciousness, I now have to make a real effort to block it out and just follow the story. But....I agree about this sundown shootout at high noon. Really about the most ridiculous ignoring of the time of day that I have ever seen. We are really spoiled today with our movies filmed at the time of day that it is supposed to be. I saw an old movie western with a sand storm the other day. Great movie, but behind all the blowing sand was clear blue western sky. Outside the boundaries of the wind machines. And that was the great John Ford, a cinematic master. Times have changed.

reply

from: once upon a time in the west (trivia)
"The final duel between Frank and Harmonica is shot almost exactly like the one in Robert Aldrich's The Last Sunset (1961) between Rock Hudson and Kirk Douglas, a film that Bernardo Bertolucci was a huge fan of."

For that reason I will rent from my local library

reply

That is interesting. You know I was never a big fan of that film either. While I loved the Eastwood Italian westerns and many of the others which came along I wasn't a fan of many of them. There were even some Lee Van CLeef ones I didn't like and I was always a big fan of his. interesting trivia note. thanx bob

reply

brillpro, there is no technical incompetence on display in this film. You perhaps are unaware that film speeds in the early '60's were much, much slower than they are today - shooting in low-light conditions was simply a technical impossibility imposed on the filmmakers by the technology of the time.

Trying to film under the conditions of a real thunderstorm or on the verge of sunset was simply impossible for the type of scenes that were required - we'd be looking at virtually blank, darkened screens devoid of detail. Shooting the sunset scene midday then dimming the brightness using the 'day for night' method was in fact standard operation in filmmaking at this time (note that all night scenes are shot on a soundstage).

The results may be jarring to an audience fifty years later, but as with watching many old films a certain allowance must be given in regard to the solving by filmmakers of the inherent technical hurdles presented by the apparatus of the time.

In regards to the similarities to the Spaghetti western genre, I found myself musing while watching that this film must surely have acted as some sort of inspiration in regards to certain stylistic tendencies that were to become prominent in that genre. Certain scenes, especially those toward the end, seem to look forward to Leone's perspectives. Note, too, Ernest Gold's electric guitar cords during certain dramatic scenes - an innovation I had always associated solely with Morricone hitherto.

reply

Well that is the best explanation i've seen and been given so far. if that is truly the case then i stand corrected despite it being an annoying set of circumstances in this film. Still not one of my fav's and while many of us aren't thrilled with the latest technologies, especially those which seem to try to remove actors from the film business, theer are some good points to technology as you so eloquently pointed out. IN the screen play i've just finished there is not attempt to remove actors...actually i probably have too many.
thanx
bob brill
brillpro

reply

No problems - good luck with your screenplay!

reply

Thanx, there has been a lot of interest lately. which has my juices flowing. hopefully it will get made but i'm not settling for a little indie where no one gets paid. it is not a labor of love although it's been with me for 50 years if you can believe that
bob brill
brillpro

reply

If Godard would've been directing this, he would've shoot the duel partly at night, partly at noon and partly at the morning, and then randomly edit it together. Plus, he would've crossed the axis a LOT, give the actors different costumes to create deliberate continuity errors, and at the end the dead Kirk Douglas would stand up, walk to the camera and tell the audience this is only a movie. And Godard was a much better director than Aldrich.

Of course I was just joking. What I wanted to tell you: this is ONLY A MOVIE. Not real life. You're bothering so much because of some puny continuity errors like this. You except a movie to be REAL, while it's not. You're too much full of Hollywood crap. You should watch filmmakers like Godard or Antonioni or Bergman, to see further. Movies are NOT reality.


"A voice from behind me reminds me. Spread out your wings you are an angel."

reply

great movie.

Kirk, you are the best ( along A. Quinn )

reply

If I was a director 50 years ago, and I couldn't realistically film a night scene, why film night scenes at all unless absolutely intrinsic to the plot?

reply

Sometimes I like to go to the theatre but you know what's wrong with that ? ...The actors are playing ...ON A WOODEN STAGE... even Homer Simpson scoffed at the lack of realism.

reply

The shadows don't bother me that much. But I did notice that the shadow inconsistency is even worse than you indicated. If you watch the quick cuts back and forth from a one-shot on Douglas to a one-shot on Hudson as they approach each other, the two one-shots are actually taken at different times of day and then edited together. Hudson consistently has a noon sun, while Douglas has an approximately two or three o'clock sun. When shown together in a two-shot, they have a noon sun.

What surprised me is that they didn't even bother to use the old standard "day for night" shooting techniques (filters, etc.). I would think the budget would allow for some blue filters. It does seem rather sloppy.

reply

Thank you for your response. I am continually amazed at the response I have gotten over the several years after posting this. Films done badly in this manner don't escape the film going public or those of us who flat out love the movies. As a screenwriter I hope any film I write never falls victim to this kind of carelessness but I'm sure it will. Bob Brill

reply

Despite the shadows flaw I enjoyed the film. Douglas gave his usual virile performance and Hudson was very stoic as the lawman. Malone sexy as usual and Lynley gave a pert performance. Nice trail scenes. Shame we didn't see more of Elam and Brand who were great Western villains. Not a great Western but not a bad one either. Thought the ending was rather moving.

'It wasn't even loaded'

Eddie (Western nut)

reply

I think Douglas was Douglas by all standards and you are right about Brand and Elam, but I just couldn't get by the rest. It just so distracted me that it overshadowed (no pun intended) all the good things about the film.

reply