I think the only similarity there is a voice of narrator. The feel-good and overly-entertaining "Amelie" can't be compared with "Jules and Jim" in any respect.
I didn't mean emotional tone of the plot. Obviously, the plot of
Amélie is cheery while
Jules et Jim is grim. I meant cinematic "tone" in terms of the visual style, direction, editing, and cinematography: The energetic
mise-en-scène of the film. As film critic Roger Ebert wrote in his review of
Jules et Jim:
There is joy in the film-making that feels fresh today and felt audacious at the time. In the energy pulsing from the screen you can see the style and sensibility [...]
Now, Jean-Pierre Jeunet stated in several interviews that
Amélie is his stylistic remake of
Jules et Jim. For this reason, Jeunet's film has an early scene where Amélie happily watches
Jules et Jim at the cinema. It is one of many overt hints by Jeunet to the audience about his directorial intentions. He, like Truffaut, is pursuing that sense of "joy in film-making."
The British Film Institute's
Sight & Sound magazine published a lengthy essay comparing the two films: The cinematography, the editing, the directorial approach, etc., are intentionally similar.
Amélie is Jeune's personal ode to French New Wave; in particular, for his own inspirational love of Truffaut's
Jules et Jim.
As Roger Ebert further noted,
Jules et Jim was "the most influential and arguably the best of those first astonishing films that broke with the past" and ushered in French New Wave. In a sense,
Jules et Jim was the battle-cry for French New Wave. Watch the first ten minutes of
Jules et Jim and then watch the first ten minutes of
Amélie. Cinematically, the tonal similarities are undeniable.
There are many, many other reviewers/critics who address this subject:
http://sarcastig.blogspot.com/2007/09/top-50-5-jules-et-jim.htmlhttp://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-jules-and-jim-1961http://2013infilm.tumblr.com/post/46420859181/film-jules-et-jim-direct or-francois-truffaut
http://www.movieinsider.com/archive/4429/#.Uo6oz975M2c
reply
share