MovieChat Forums > Creature from the Haunted Sea Discussion > Do people not understand this is a comed...

Do people not understand this is a comedy?


Reading through the reviews, I'm shocked most people are taking this comedy as as a failed attempt at a serious monster movie! It's obviously a SPOOF, an INTENTIONAL one at that. Doesn't really matter I guess, because it's fun and entertaining any way you look at it. Corman and Griffith knew what they were doing here, but it's a shame this has such a low rating. I guess most people nowadays don't get humor unless the jokes are followed by a laugh track or the gags aren't shoved directly in their faces a la SCARY MOVIE.

http://pages.suddenlink.net/capkronos/golden_hatchet_awards.htm

reply

[deleted]

I found it funny, and enjoyable. Perhaps you had to live in those times to appreciate such a skewed take on the political goings-on then. It also owed a lot to the beatnicks, and avant garde film making. Certainly, it is not a great film, but it is far more interesting, and cleverer than lots of films with higher production values. "Creature From The Black Lagoon" was a serious attempt at a making a monster film, with a much bigger budget. It is far from great. I liked it, but it doesn't have the charm of it's cruder and cheaper cousin.

reply

[deleted]

Well, we agree that Haunted Sea was better than Party Beach.

I haven't seen Saucer Men since I was a kid.

Bucket of Blood is a genuine cult film, and I think a good one, considering its budget and era. I agree it is clearly a "take" on the beats, but isn't anything like the avant garde experimental narrative of the era. Haunted Sea however, seems to take some inspiration from from experimental narrative of that era. I say this as someone who became interested in experimental film back then, and has been on the screening committee of an experimental film festival for nearly two decades. Obviously, it is not a great film, or even as good as Bucket of Blood. Still, I think it is an odd little relic that has some unpretentious charm, and a fair amount of humor. I liked it enough, found it odd, and rare, enough to burn a DVD of it anyway...

reply

[deleted]

You think Creature From the Black Lagoon is terrible? I love it, too. In my opinion, CFTHS was very amusing; loved a lot of the dialogue and thought the acting and awful monster costume was just part of the fun. So basically, I had a good time watching it. My observation was directed mainly toward some of the reviews I've read saying things like "The monster costume was terrible" etc... Well YEAH, it is terrible. They knew it was terrible and it wasn't as if they were attempting to make a serious monster movie. But I can totally understand people not liking the style of humor. To each his own, I guess.

However, I don't agree that Corman "never made a great movie." The Masque of the Red Death (1964), Pit and the Pendulum (1961) and House of Usher (1960) are in my opinion great films. I also think many of his others, such as The Tomb of Ligeia (1964), X: The Man With X-Ray Eyes (1963) and The Intruder (1962) are very good.

http://pages.suddenlink.net/capkronos/golden_hatchet_awards.htm

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

It's a farce. The humor is in the situations (a mobster and his gang kidnap Cuban nationals for no apparent reason, then plan to murder them and blame it on a "fictional" monster that "just happens" to be real), the ridiculous characterizations (a "dangerous" mobster who walks through life doing bad Humphrey Bogart impersonations and has a female alias, his devoted sidekick who communicates only via animal noises, and the federal agent on his trail who's in love with the moll and builds a short wave radio out of hot dogs and pickles), and the intentionally silly dialog (too many examples to quote!). You have to at least smirk if you don't actually laugh out loud. It's certainly not one of the worst movies ever.

reply

Tonight, TCM broadcast the shorter theatrical cut of Creature From the Haunted Sea. It plays a lot better than the padded TV version. Griffith had less than a week to write the film, and while this script doesn't compare favorably to his Bucket of Blood or Little Shop of Horrors, it's OK, I think, given the circumstances.

reply

Did anyone Tivo TCM's broadcast by any chance?

reply

I am from that era, and imo this film gives Ed Wood a good run for his money. The dialogue is rubbish, the acting is rubbish, the directing is rubbish, the cinematography is rubbish, the props ... well, better not even go there.

reply

I strongly disagree with the previous poster and agree with the o.p., Capkronos, and with Balkaster. The dialogue is very funny, and quotable, even. The acting (which I discuss further down) is not bad for the most part. I'd say the cinematography wasn't the best, but I wouldn't categorize it as "rubbish." The props... what props? Aside from the spear guns, which seemed a little flimsy, I didn't notice anything off-kilter. There were no wobbling tombstones, a la Ed Wood. So the characterization of this giving "Ed Wood a good run for his money" is unfair. That the monster was cheap and unconvincing is a given. Won't argue that point.

I personally like this film -- more so than "Little Shop of Horrors," which seems to be unjustifiable revered (to me, it's just cheap, badly-shot, and, especially in comparison to the later musical remake,unfunny). CFTHS, despite being rather silly at times, has some hidden depth. I don't know if it's intentional in Charles B. Griffith's script that Renzo is a father-figure to both Jack (Mary-Belle's brother) and Pete. But while Pete is the favorite "son," Renzo seems to withhold his love for Jack. Jack can't seem to do anything to gain Renzo's affection. When Pete "brings home" a girl, Renzo adopts a mockingly gruff tone and rolls his eyes. But shortly thereafter, when Jack returns with a girl himself, Renzo seems genuinely angry. "You found this woman in San Juan?!" (and how can you not be amused by Jack's innocent reply, "Well, she was living in sort of a sorority house down by the docks. She's awful friendly.")

To the constantly aired comment that this movie is "badly acted," I say it's not -- at least until the end, when the monster shows up and the characters have to react to it. THEN it is bad (and this is also the director's fault for not getting better reactions from the actors -- or any reactions in a few cases [ahem, Carbone, Towne and Dickerson] -- and the editor's fault for not editing out said non-reactions). Up until then, the actors do their job well enough (just watch the scene when Mary-Belle gives Renzo--Anthony Carbone--a compliment, about how he'll come up with some way to get rid of all the Cubans "'cause you're my sweet-talkin' baby" (or something like that). You can see that Renzo is rather overwhelmed by that statement. He doesn't know whether to blush, turn away embarrassed, or embrace her).

I've watched this movie several times now because I was practicing on some movie editing software. I cut it down from its almost 75-minute length to about 30 minutes, trying to keep the plot as coherent as possible. Then I added in some intertitles (all spoofing film names) and songs. So, having worked with the film quite a bit, I have some affection for this "Creature."

reply

i have to say i went into this thinking it was a scary monster flick, it is marketed that way i think. anyways it not and aside from the saong the lady sings on the boat which is thought was really different the movies fails. 2/10

IMDb Top10 Severed Face Movieshttp://www.imdb.com/keyword/severed-face/

reply

[deleted]

Even in the opening scene it is obvious that the film is a spoof. The agent is having his canvas shoes polished! He puts on a false mustache as a disguise and then goes to the bar and has a ridiculous conversation with the other agent and trips up on the way out. It reminds me the many spy spoofs there have been such as Carry on Spying and Spy Hard, but with an early Dr Who style fluffy monster thrown in.

reply

I thought that scene where the cute Latina girl was killed by the Sea Creature was sad...

The scene where that guy kept hitting his head on the ceiling was funny! LOL! There's a piece of animation where several Cubans all look like Fidel Castro!

reply


really a comedy?




When there's no more room in hell, The dead will walk the earth...

reply

yes iut was presented as a comedy, but it totally failed at most parts. maybe the picke radio and a telephone call was theo nly funny parts. and for a movie called "creature from the haunted sea" we see around 3 minutes of creature slowly walking.

----------
"Common sense is not so common."
- Voltaire

reply