MovieChat Forums > Le trou (1997) Discussion > Any thoughts on the Ending?

Any thoughts on the Ending?



A superb finish to the film, laconic, precise and ambigious.

One does not know for "certain" if Gaspard turned in the others. That was the beauty of it.

God is Dead.
Nietzsche

reply

No, we don't. And we don't know if, in the beginning of the film, the prison director put Gaspard in that very cell with the others on purpose. I had the feeling that he did. You know, Roland was a known escape artist. Very clever. They always frisked his cell, and never found anything. Maybe putting an (involuntary) "spy" in their cell was the only way to defeat his plan.

reply

It all leads to some interesting hyptheses.

God is Dead.
Nietzsche

reply

What kind of duck is an hyptheses?


Nietzsche is Dead.
God




reply

I loved everything but the ending. (spoiler alert) To me it made no sense. Gaspard must have betrayed them--how else would the guards have known exactly when the escape was to take place, and why else would Gaspard not be stripped and put in solitary along with others? But what exactly would Gaspard have had to gain by betraying his mates anyway? If it really was, as the warden says, simply up to the magistrate to drop the charges (after Gaspard's wife withdrew her complaint), what could the warden possibly have had to offer Gaspard that would make the betrayal worth it? I can only think that the warden suspected something, must have suspected something, and warned Gaspard that he could end up back in prison on charges of abetting an escape.

But then, if he did betray his mates, why not storm the cell right away rather than that night? Why send Gaspard back to the cell at all, only to transfer him later once the cell had been stormed? Loved the movie, felt a little cheated by the ending.

reply

But what exactly would Gaspard have had to gain by betraying his mates anyway? If it really was, as the warden says, simply up to the magistrate to drop the charges (after Gaspard's wife withdrew her complaint), what could the warden possibly have had to offer Gaspard that would make the betrayal worth it? I can only think that the warden suspected something, must have suspected something, and warned Gaspard that he could end up back in prison on charges of abetting an escape.

I agree. I think the warden suspected all along that Roland, the escape artist from cell number 6, was planning another jailbreak, and telling Gaspard that his wife had dropped the charges was probably just a trick to make him talk (otherwise they wouldn't have put him in another cell at the end of the movie).

But then, if he did betray his mates, why not storm the cell right away rather than that night? Why send Gaspard back to the cell at all, only to transfer him later once the cell had been stormed?

Dramatic license, I guess. I can't really think of a reason to send him back to the cell, unless they wanted to catch the escapees in the act of escape.

reply

I watched the movie last night. The ending is not ambiguous. Gaspard was not a plant in the Cell by the authorities. When he was summoned to the Governors office and told of his impending release he believed he had to tell all about tonight’s escape attempt otherwise his imminent release would be massively jeopardized. Just because Gaspard was wrongly sentenced to jail in the first place does not mean, law wise, he would be immune from a further jail sentence for aiding in an escape attempt that was to occur that night.

Gaspard believed he had 2 choices; 1) tell Governor all about the escape that night so as to not harm his imminent release or 2) not inform the Governor but be a bystander in the escape that was planned that night. Once Gaspard’d murder charge was overturned he would surely have faced another jail sentence for being involved in an escape attempt of other prisoners.

Maybe Gaspard had another option. He could have told the Governor nothing but then told the inmates the truth and insisted that they wait to escape until after he is fully released which the Governor implied was “imminent but not tomorrow”. Once released Gaspard could have argued the tunnel must have been in the cell before he arrived and he had no knowledge about it. Gaspard could have told the authorities the inmates must have been ready to leave on the day he arrived but postponed it fearing his arrival. The prisoner that stayed behind could have easily corroborated this story.

Of course Gaspard would be placed in a (single occupied) cell at the end of the movie. He is to be released shortly so his safety from other prisoners needs to be ensured. Gaspard was with the Governor for 2 hours and only 2 minutes of this was idle chit chat. The rest would have been a guarantee from Governor for clemency in return for full co-operation and safety until he is released which is to happen very soon.

reply

Gaspard was not a plant in the Cell by the authorities.

How do you know?

When he was summoned to the Governors office and told of his impending release he believed he had to tell all about tonight’s escape attempt otherwise his imminent release would be massively jeopardized.

Exactly. And maybe that was the point in telling him he would be released soon. If a jailbreak was imminent, this was their best shot at uncovering it. Was Gaspard really going to be released, or was he tricked by the warden? We have no way of knowing it, but since betrayal is one of the film's pivotal themes, and considering the way the ending is orchestrated, I tend to believe that the director betrayed him just like he betrayed his fellow inmates.

Of course Gaspard would be placed in a (single occupied) cell at the end of the movie. He is to be released shortly so his safety from other prisoners needs to be ensured.

That's not indicative of a release. On the contrary, his safety would need to be ensured more than ever if he was not going to be released soon.

Gaspard was with the Governor for 2 hours and only 2 minutes of this was idle chit chat. The rest would have been a guarantee from Governor for clemency in return for full co-operation and safety until he is released which is to happen very soon.

The question remains, if he did betray the escape plot to the last detail, why did he go back to the cell and wait for the capture? It was obvious that the others would blame it on him and seek revenge. Plotwise this makes no sense, however, I figure it was the only way to make possible the dramatic surprise ending with the final view through the periscope mirror etc. Gaspard had to be sent back to the cell so the audience would assume that he kept his mouth shut.

reply

It seems obvious that Gaspard has informed. He's just spent two hours talking to the Governor. The warders know to treat him separately from the other prisoners. One warder (with others behind him) enters the cell through the hole, so he (and those behind him) have started from some other point on the route -- there's no reason for them to know where to look unless someone's informed.

The really good bit about this is the intense relationship of the working-class old lags, into which Gaspard is slowly admitted; and how the good-looking boy with all the advantages (all of which he's squandered) also makes a mess of that relationship.

That part of the film where he gets out of further discussion by appealing to friendship is simply wonderful. When you see it, you think it's a cop-out on the part of the director, a Hollywoodish surrender to sentimentality. But, as events prove, it's anything but. The cell-mates let themselves down by accepting, however reluctantly, that appeal to friendship.

Rather than debate all that, wouldn't it be more useful to ask if Gaspard's version of the shooting is accurate; or whether his wife and the maid were telling the truth?

reply

I think his story was true. For one thing, his wife wanted to punish him for cheating on her, so she had a motive for giving a false testimony. But more importantly, Gaspard didn't seem to be the type of person who would resort to violence on the spur of the moment. I distinctly remember a scene when the other inmates beat up the plumbers who had stolen their cigarettes. The look on Gaspard's face pretty much summed up his reaction: He was staggered, probably disgusted, at this gross display of violence.

reply

>>Gaspard didn't seem to be the type of person who would resort to violence on the spur of the moment.

No, but he did seem the type of person who would betray his wife with a 16 year old minor, and then go on to betray his friends. Gaspard is young and foolish, vain and unprincipled. If a man will betray his own wife he'll betray anyone or anything else.

reply

Nobody has brought up Roland's final line, "Poor Gaspard.," and I suspect the answer lies there. I interpret this to mean that Gaspard did indeed betray his mates, but that by doing so he has dishonored himself beyond repair; he will have to live with having witnessed the men's titanic effort to escape from start to finish, and having dashed it to pieces.

Gaspard is the classic modern amoralist and collaborateur.





I am in a blissful state, so don't bug me.

reply

Just finished watching this, and what a great film it is! Criminally underrated!

Now to add my two cents - and I think everyone has been making good points - I agree that Gaspard evidently betrayed the other inmates. There can be no doubt about it. As to the meaning of the final sentence, I'm leaning slightly toward ciphoid_9's view because I understoodd the line to be a confirmation that Gaspard has indeed been fooled by the prison director. Poor Gaspard! He is not going to be released. I got this impression from the way the guard comes in and bluntly removes Gaspard's makeshift necktie and points him to the cell on the opposite side of the block: "Cell number 7." It struck me that, even though the guards must know about Gaspard's deal with the director (they seperate him from the others), they still treat him like a prisoner, and rather unfriendly I might add. Then, Gaspard slowly walks out of the cell and turns to Roland, who THEN says "Poor Gaspard" - as if commenting on the fact that Gaspard is re-assigned to a neighboring cell rather than released as he had hoped. If Jacques Becker meant to imply that Gaspard was actually going to be released, why would he show him being locked up right away in a cell right on the opposite wall? You'd think he would at least show him being led out of the cell block by the director or something.

Well, I may be wrong, and I have to say your interpretation makes a lot of sense as well, gnolti. But anyway, that's how I think about it.

EDIT: I've just given this film 10 stars. I hope it will enter IMDB's Top-250 list soon, because that's where it belongs.

reply

You are correct that Gaspard had, in turn, been betrayed by the prison director just as he had betrayed his mates. I think the image of him being led to the new cell was just so unexpected that I hadn't thought to make sense of it (a holding cell, perhaps?, that sort of thing).

But I also think that "Poor Gaspard" is also, as I pointed out, a verdict on his honor and character, which is equally pitiable.




I am in a blissful state, so don't bug me.

reply

Gaspard had to make the choice of living a life of comfort or honor. Perhaps we all have to make this choice. "Poor Gaspard" indicates that Roland truly did pity him for the choice he made.

reply

Also no one has mentoned the scene where Gaspard suggests to take the taxi in the street. It shows his true nature which was temporarily quelled by Manu.

He obviously was a sketchy character to begin with as well. Remember the first scene with the lighter and the warden? Gaspard's friendliness is what saves him, even though he consciously did something wrong. This character trait is counterpointed by the inmate that precedes him in this scene - the guy who is refusing to eat for 48 hours until he gets a fair trial. That is the most cliched "I'm not guilty" plea I've ever heard and it shows that all prisoners are willing to do anything to get out. Fortunately for Gaspard, he uses his friendliness and not hunger strikes.

All told it's a great movie. Then again so is A MAN ESCAPED.

reply

[deleted]

I think Gaspard was scared by the beating because he'd get it much worse if the other conspirators sussed him out!

Gaspard sees himself as above the other inmates, who he feels are common criminals, while he's an amoral slickster. In prison, con men & white collar criminals often feel superior morally to other prisoners, but inferior physically. Consequently they can justify informing on other prisoners.

reply

/..why not storm the cell right away rather than that night?//

If the Authorities did so, the convicts would make themselves look very much surprised about discovering the hole (".. what the ### is that? we haven't seen it before!")

Listen to your enemy, for God is talking

reply

Perhaps the warden lied to Gaspar and said that the wife dropped the charges when she really didn't. Then he told Gaspar he would be doing 20 years unless he turned on his cell mates; in which case the warden would do everything in his power to free him.

reply

You're missing the fact that helping convicts escape is a crime. He had to turn them in if he wanted to get off.

And yes Gaspard did turn them in. He screamed to get them to come in!!!

Somebody here has been drinking and I'm sad to say it ain't me - Allan Francis Doyle

reply

Gaspard may not have told. The plumbers, for example, have reason to speak- for revenge- and had the chance to find out. The senior guard, who started searching the cell and then left, is another who may have known: did he notice something in peoples' attitudes or find something in the pile of cardboard? There'sJoe, whose concern for his mother is so great that he won't take part- there are a lot of potential informants. From the prison commander's point of view, it's better if no-one knows how they learned or if they blame someone other than the real informant.
On the other hand there is more against Gaspard: he has seduced his sister-in-law, but he mentions that the maid hates him- one womders why- and there is no reason to believe his own account of the shooting- after all, he's a second-hand car salesman, not a set of people famous for their veracity.

reply

One thing that really surprises me in all these discussions regarding the hidden agendas of the parties involved (i.e. what did the wardens know, what did the inmates know, etc.), is that it should be stupendously obvious that if prison wardens had any, even slightest suspicion that the inmates in that cell were attempting to break out, they would've simply raided the cell, turned every stone in it, and discovered the hole in the floor. I mean, how difficult would it be to look for holes in that tiny cell? The inmates really had no other choice, they had to go out through some sort of an opening, a hole, they couldn't be working on some sci-fi teleporting mechanism, right?

In the light of this, all the talks about how the prison authorities may have planted Gaspard in the hopes that he will crumble and rat on his inmates are totally misguided. We're not talking foreign espionage here -- the inmates are always, 24 hours a day, at the mercy of the authorities, who can preemptively examine every inch of their cell.

So definitely, Gaspard was not planted as a weak link.

He was, nevertheless, a victim of intricate 'head games' that authorities in that position must unavoidably play. Managing a large prison is not for the faint hearted, and the wardens and their chiefs are, out of necessity, a nasty bunch. They are forced to play cat-and-mouse with the inmates, to attempt to pit one against the other. Thus it should come as no surprise that the prison director came up with a make-believe story for Gaspard -- how his wife withdraw the charges, just to see Gaspard's reaction. I'm sure the director's been playing similar head games with many other prisoners, in order to break their spirit by giving them false hope. Cruel, yes, but perhaps necessary given the harsh conditions of dealing with heavy criminals.

What made the prison director pick Gaspard for that psychological experiment? Why, the fact that it was reported that Gaspard had made the wrong turn after the visitation, and attempted to return to his previous cell. That little faux pais, or gaffe, alerted the authorities that there was something weighing on Gaspard's conscious, and that he seem to be distraught and could be involved in something out of the ordinary. Immediately, they acted upon that hunch. And their hunch proved to be correct.

My take is that what's been portrayed in this movie is a freakish coincidence that the prison director had started toying with Gaspard on the very day they were ready to escape. He managed to break Gaspard's spirit by giving him a false hope and thus making him 'sing'. Gaspard couldn't stand the idea of being so close to getting exonerated and then destroying his real freedom by escaping from the prison and being hunted down by the law as a fugitive. Consequently, he ratted on the whole plan.

The evidence that Gaspard betratyed his mates is offered in the movie -- remember the scene when the covert warden force was shown to have been hiding underground, waiting for the inmates to attempt to escape. One warden was shown climbing up from the hole, while informing the others below to return using an easier route. It is obvious that Gaspard spent 2 hours with the prison wardens showing them the planned route underground, after which he was returned to his cell.

Why was he returned to his cell? Simple -- the prison wardens had to buy some time and regroup and organize the ambush, to make sure they catch the prisoners in case they, in desperation, decide to run for it sooner than was originally planned.

Poor Gaspard bought the phony director's story hook, line and sinker; of course there wasn't any withdrawal of charges from his wife, and after their escape operation got busted, Gaspard was transferred to the solitary confinement, his sentence now looking even bleaker. Plus, as a demonstrated informant, his life got seriously endangered, as other prisoners do not look kindly upon such rats. That's why Roland uttered "Poor Gaspard" -- feeling sorry for this man's utterly ruined life. All on account of Gaspard's childish naivete.

reply

Thus it should come as no surprise that the prison director came up with a make-believe story for Gaspard -- how his wife withdraw the charges, just to see Gaspard's reaction.
What evidence is there that the story was false? Other than that, I agree with everything you say, alexbunardzic.

reply


But the prison director didn't make up the story about his wife's change of mind, his sister-in-law told him, so we can suppose it's true.

I've only just seen it, and at the moment I think it's deliberately ambiguous...


reply

I don't think the prison director deliberately told lies to Gaspard - by no means. Why? As one of you noted rightfully in his comment, prison's personnel may be "nasty", since they deal with a specific kind of the people; that means the personnel may be coarse, callous and even brutal. But since they are representing the state, they are not allowed to use lies even for the sake of enforcing the law. It would be unlawfull.

Why Gaspard was sent to the solitary? Because he has had still to wait for a while for his release.

He was an unhappy and bad man.


Thanks God, I'm an Atheist! - Luis Bunuel

reply

But the prison director didn't make up the story about his wife's change of mind, his sister-in-law told him, so we can suppose it's true.


*Cough-cough* Nicole, Gaspard's lover/sister-in-law, said that she wasn't even on talking terms iwth his wife after the shooting incident-- she had merely heard his wife sobbing in bed (after flatly refusing his attorney to withdraw charges) and THOUGHT/SUGGESTED that the charges would be withdrawn IF Garpard "asked" his wife to do so (read: "beg for forgiveness")...

So, sorry to those looking for a "happy ending" for Gaspard-- but the film does NOT give us any final/clear indication as to whether Gaspard's wife actually withdrew murder charges... that would actually require some epilogue or even a scene with Gaspard's wife or attorney, which is fortunately omitted (since it disrupts the "unity of space & time" this film aimed for and achieved).


What the scene with his lover DOES show us is the "Alpha-Male" side to Gaspard's character, so carefully "disguised/restrained" in front of other males (though Gaspard cannot help "snapping" at his cell-mates whenever his love life is discussed): I'm sure most of us will know the (car-salesmen?) type-- guys who plays it "down/cool" in front of other guys just to garner (especially female) sympathy... it's not just a movie stereotype.

Assuredly proud and defiant before his lover, whom he has NOT even/ever bothered to write to, Gaspard is clearly the "dominant" party in his relationship with his lover-- as well as with his wife, whom he has clearly NOT ever/even tried seeing in order to ask for the charges to be withdrawn... in contrast to "helpless/hen-pecked" profile he gives his cell-mates.


And this is in spite his lover deliberately making a visit so as to ask him (probably not for first time) to at least meet up with his wife-- all for the hope that they might ultimately be together (Gaspard's lover seems more prepared for a "very long engagement" than he is)....

As another poster has pointed out, seducing rich women and teenage girls are just the least of Gaspard's character flaws (in addition to "cracking quickly under pressure/temptation")-- I mean, notice that he and his lover did NOT even discuss asking the help/maid to tell the "truth" and change her story that she and his lover were actually upstairs during the shooting incident... which (if the help/maid was not lying) made both Gaspard and his lover out to be LIARS.


I'm saying that I'd kill without batting an eyelid-- and you're asking if my eyes got dry?

reply

yes, Gaspard must have snitched. It's why he yells before the warders have even come in. It's why they don't grab him and drag him out with the rest. If he wasn't sent back to the cell, the four men might get suspicious and break out before the governor can prepare for their capture.

I don't think there's any evidence that he was a plant, though. After all, the announcement that his wife's dropped the charges follows Nicole's mention that she might do so - but the warders didn't hear that; Gaspard and Nicole were alone together. I think he just spilled the beans because it would have jeopardised his own release. And there's no evidence that the governor has tricked him or that he won't be freed in a few days. I think the phrase 'poor Gaspard' is just a recognition that Gaspard is too weak and selfish ever to live as a man.

Remember this film is set in 1947, just after the war. In effect, Gaspard is a reflection of those who collaborated with the Nazi occupiers, while the escapers represent the resistance who tried to escape the Germans' grip. They show the power of men working together. Gaspard shows the weakness of those who think only of themselves.

reply

<<The inmates really had no other choice, they had to go out through some sort of an opening, a hole, they couldn't be working on some sci-fi teleporting mechanism, right? >>

They could have been in possession of a copy of the necronomicon.



I am Ripper... Tearer... Slasher... Gouger...I am the Teeth in the Darkness



reply

It's clear that Gaspard ratted them out.
Let's not forget that he did not see himself as a criminal. Perhaps the warden told him (or made up) the heinous crimes the other four had committed. Perhaps his feelings were hurt by the others because of their lack of trust, especially Geo didn't like him much. And may be he was just a prick who would sell his own mother.

I liked the open ending, we don't know Gaspards motives, but how anyone believes he did not snitch is beyond me. He even cried for help as soon as the warders outside were spotted, before he was attacked even.

reply

As for why Gaspard was returned to his cell, I think the warden needed to catch them in the act and Gaspard had to tell him when the break was to take place. Otherwise, they could have simply said "A hole in the floor under the boards? We didn't know it was there--we wouldn't still be here if we knew." The warden needed to prove it was them. And even tho his wife dropped the charges, which took away the premeditated murder part, he was still liable for the assault, which, as they stated, would still get him 5 years. The implication is that it took 2 hours for the warden to negotiate with the judge to get all charges dropped in return for the info. Gaspard would still have to go to court for the final dismissal, which is not something the warden has the power to do, only recommend. In my opinion, the warden did plant Gaspard deliberately, since in reviewing the case he knew the wife was likely to drop the charges, and then he would have the leverage he needed--he certainly knew that one of them had escaped before and knew how to do it. If Gaspard had gone thru with the escape, he would have been captured sooner of later and then done time for both the escape and the assault. Hobson's choice.

reply

Whe KNOW that Gaspard betrayed the other!

How do we know?

1. He screamed when he understood that the others knew he was the snitch so the guards would save him.
2. He was not frisked or in any way threated like the others


As for why he turned them in it should be obvious to all that helping convicts escape is a crime. He had to turn them in if he wanted to get off.

Somebody here has been drinking and I'm sad to say it ain't me - Allan Francis Doyle

reply

Yeah, it's pretty obvious that he betrayed them. And it's pretty obvious what his motives were. He believed he was getting out, and he believed that it would be detrimental to him somehow to let the escape happen.

I don't think it's clear whether he was planted there or not. It's possible though. First of all, you have to consider that they had a known prison breaker in the cell, so there had to have been a close eye on them. Second, Gaspard himself pointed out the reasons why it was suspicious that they wanted the cardboard job. The Warden may have also been suspicious.

Though I think it is clear that if he was planted there, he didn't know it. He may have just been manipulated. It's apparently odd to put 5 men in a cell, who knows if that was purposeful or due to necessity as they were told. From the opening scene, the Warden is shown as seeing Gaspard as different from the other prisoners. His friendliness among other qualities may have been reason for the Warden to choose him as the 5th man for the cell.

Also, I don't think it's beyond reason to believe that Gaspard was also double-crossed by the Warden. It seems very unlikely, but the girl coming to visit him could have been a setup too. I doubt this but it is kind of strange that the guard rips the tie off of him.

reply

// doubt this but it is kind of strange that the guard rips the tie off of him.///

In order to prevent him from committing suicide.

Thank God, I'm an Atheist! - Luis Bunuel

reply

And why would he commit suicide?
He certainly wouldn't if he was to be released afterwards isn't that right?
The only reason I can see as possible for him to suicide with the tie later, is because the Chief-Warden indeed DID double-cross him, and that's why he is called "Pour Gaspard" in the end.

If he realized that he was betrayed to betray his own for nothing, it's certainly a good reason in my eyes, to commit suicide. Can't really think for another reason good enough to commit suicide, so I think this is the version I find more probable in this movie to explain things...

Anyone has a different idea on this to explain it?

reply

One element missing from this discussion, and it's a vital one, is class. Becker was a Marxist and the film is imbued with the idea that the working class (the four original cellmates) can never trust the bourgeoisie (Gaspard). Right from the outset of the film we get the sense that Gaspard likes the Director of the prison as much as the Director likes him. They are both bourgeois, as opposed to the convicts (and indeed most of the warders), who are clearly working class. In the final analysis, as much as Gaspard begins to admire the qualities and solidarity of the proletariat, he will never identify with them and he will always put his own interests first. The other four convicts are shown by Becker to be far nobler; any one of them would sacrifice himself for the sake of his comrades, as Geo in fact is prepared to do by staying behind to face the music. If the escape had been successful he would have been heavily punished for his complicity, despite the fact that he did not attempt to escape himself.

In my opinion this is by far the greatest prison movie ever made.

reply

I think the Chief-Warden supposed Gaspard would endure the pangs of conscience as severe so he could even take his own life, so the Chief-Warden ordered to remove his necktie.

//the Chief-Warden indeed DID double-cross him/// - I don't think so. But he told Gaspard about his possible release before Gaspard informed on his mates. Probably, after learning about Gaspard's part in digging the hole etc, he changed his intentions.

///and that's why he is called "Pour Gaspard" in the end/// - I think Roland, who was morally far superior than Gaspard (and his cellmates as well) just took pity on Gaspard, for Gaspard, as a traitor, was really miserable.

Thanks God, I'm an Atheist! - Luis Bunuel

reply

Gaspard might prefer suicide to the possibility of being tortured or murdered by the proletariat criminals he betrayed. For example, in a prison riot suspected informers are often targeted.

Ties are taken from inmates in the U.S. to prevent suicide, & to stave off a potential liability suit if they are left on. Great discussion !

reply

///prefer suicide to the possibility of being tortured or murdered///

rather the possibility of being tortured by the pangs of conscience.

Listen to your enemy, for God is talking

reply

And why would he commit suicide?


It does not matter whether prison inmates had any reason to commit suicide or whether the guards know of any such reasons-- it was prison SOP (Standard Operating/Operational Procedure/Protocol) to remove ties, belts, sharp objects from a prisoner's wardrobe.

After all the trouble Becker went through to show how the prison system is pretty much just a well-oiled machine, it should be obvious that the wardens/guards don't really have to think or morally struggle through the things that they do...


And that includes the way the guards/wardens try to mix up the prisoners of different backgrounds in each cell and even "ingratiate" themselves with the prisoners where appropriate (prisoners can't really "make friends" with the guards/wardens if the other side doesn't "play ball").


I'm saying that I'd kill without batting an eyelid-- and you're asking if my eyes got dry?

reply

As much as I enjoy prison movies, most of them are quite predictable, this one wasn't, what a great surprise.

reply

One does not know for "certain" if Gaspard turned in the others. That was the beauty of it.


Wonderful thread and lots of lovely thoughts about the ending-- but the OP's thought about the ending is possibly the most inane one of all...

Gaspard having betrayed his cell-mates is probably the most "certain" thing we can say about the ending...


I'm saying that I'd kill without batting an eyelid-- and you're asking if my eyes got dry?

reply