the one thing i do NOT get

You're 100% right. That is not one bit realistic of Native Americans. She has blonde hair and says "ugga-wugga Wigwam" constantly. I have a friend who is Navajo and is not one bit like this, nor were his ansestors.

However, you're taking it quite seriously, which isn't supposed to be intended. This is a musical for children. Pirates didn't really "want a mother", there were no lost boys who few, no peter pan. James Berry wrote the story, and then this was a musical adaptation. Tiger Lilly is a completely fictional native american. In fact, to even call the 'Indians' in this musical 'Native Americans' almost takes away the fantasy of it.

Of course it's politically incorrect to call Native Americans 'Indians' but as said before, this is a musical for children. Native Americans might be offended by this musical because of Tiger Lilly, and that's there perogative.

I personally know it's a faerie-tale.

Barrie wrote Peter Pan more than 100 years ago, after all, and the story evolved from fantasy stories that Barrie told to his neighbor children (and games that they all played together), stories that incorporated the elements of late-19th-century British schoolchildren's imaginations: Red Indians (as they were known) with tomahawks and feathers, pirates, fairies, and so on . . . none of this was intended to seem "real," as it is "only make-believe." The Neverland is a glorious mixture of all these elements, and reality is simply not allowed. Different cultures? That's the real world. The Neverland is out of this world, indeed. And within its magical borders, anything is possible. Please don't judge the past by the standards of the present; to do so is rather unfair and generally unproductive . . . .

(Of course real Indians/Native Americans/First Nations people don't say such things, nor are they usually blonde (as Tiger Lily is in the production). And when my own grandmother came to the USA at age 21 in 1911 from northern Germany, her own grandmother worried that her granddaughter would be scalped by the Red Indians (in New York City, where Nana was headed)!)

[deleted]

The first thing I think I should bring to your attention is the fact that your problem is with tiger lily being unrealistic--- the title character of Peter Pan, an adolescent boy, is played by an incredible, yet, inarguably female, mature, WOMAN...And TIGER LILY is what upset you? :):) It is of course a well noted fact that this particular play and musical have, in recent year primarily, generated quite a lot of heat and hatred within the Native American Community. Coming from a town just outside a large Reservation, I can tell you from personal experience, that productions of the show are not permitted to be performed in the local area schools, and productions done outside the schools within the community have generated rather nasty riot scenes, with yelling, screaming, picketting, and threats to persue legal action against the shows producers.
Yes, you and those angry Native American tribes are quite right in your determination that the portrayal of "Indians" is not "realistic," and is rather silly. The major hole in your argument, however, lies in the subject matter of the play and story itself. In his play, and the subsequent Musical adapted from it, Barrie structures the ENTIRETY of the plot around the concepts and notions of the fairly universal "Childhood games" played, particularly by little boys, within the realm of "Make Believe." Neverland is made up COMPLETELY of these games; The inhabitanst are "Pirates and Indians" The two QUENTISENTIAL childhood games of make believe, especially in the context of the time period in which Barrie was writing. If you saw finding Neverland, you know that he created the story and the play to entertain children, little boys in particular...The Darling boys... But, because it is ONLY MAKE BELIEVE, the Pirates and Indians of Barries world are MAKE BELIEVE as well. THey are MEANT to be UNREALISTIC, and INTENDED TO BE SILLY. Otherwise, this would NOT be a children's story AT ALL. JUst think for a moment of the number of things which could potentially be TERRIFYING if they were presented as REAL. Man eating crocodiles, marauding pirates who only seek to slaughter little boys.... etc etc. But in the Play, ALL THAT OCCURS IS PART OF ONE, BIG, GAME. You'll Notice that no one EVER actually dies--- Pirates are thrown overboard and Hook, blown up, yet, the next scene shows them very much alive, in chains. The Captain is perpetually killing off pirates who happen to annoy him; we see him shoot them dead, yet they are back up and alive before you know what's happened. This is because it's ALL A GAME. And like childhood games of Pirates and Indians, no one really DIES, and no one is actually trying to kill anyone else.
Therefore, the "Indians" portrayed are the "Indians" of childhood fantasy. In Barrie's time period, and clearly even in the time frame of this movie and the musical, this was NOT an OFFENSIVE portrayl of actual Native Americans. It was a portrayl of the fake, silly, "Ugg-uh-Wugg", "Smokum Peace Pipe" Indians of fantasy. And that, is what it continues to be. The recent attempts to make the "Brave Noble Warriors" look authentic, I find to be actually MORE offensive than ANYTHING portrayed by Jerome Robbins. In attempting to put "Authentic" Natives on the stage, it is actually playing further into the false stereo-types they are attempting to avoid. It's OBVIOUS that the Fanstasy Indians, with their leader a bright eyed blonde, wearing rediculous outfits, and singing silly lyrics such as Ugg-uh-Wugg-uh Meatball, are not intended to be a representation of ACTUAL REALITY.
To wrap this up, I will add that, when I did finally get a chance to do the show, a good distance from the Reservation grounds, the girl who played Wendy was half Native American, and lived on the Reservation. Because her mother was non-Native, both the mother and her child, this particular girl, who DID have native ancestry, were sent countless notes actually threatening their lives if they didn't leave the father, of native blood, and get off the reservation grounds. They had object thrown at their house, their car, and themselves, and fairly quickly took the hint and left. This particular girl had been an active member of the native cultural groups in the community, and was one of a very small number who was actually carrying on the native linage. Yet, by her own account, from the time of her birth, she and her mother had been harrassed. SHe was a very tough, strong, girl as a result. Yet, as strong as she was, she told me several times, of her own volition, that even she couldn't take the "natives," and they were a people of whom she said, were capable of "horrible things." But the bottom line was, she was not offended as a Native American, and said that those Natives who WERE offended were only the ones looking for a reason to fight, regardless of what it happened to be.

settle down. this was from a time where indians were taken away from their land and weren't respected as much. so settle down, bud.

Of course not. Pocahontas doesn't do that either.

Maybe they aren't really NATIVE AMERICANS- they are in Never Never Land, aren't they? I do agree that it's not correct though. It's comically incorrect.

I have a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell!

This video was made back in 1960, long before the existence of the political correct way of thinking that gave birth to your post. They aren't supposed to be actual "Indians", but just children playing at being Indians --thus the innocent portrayal.