MovieChat Forums > La notte (1962) Discussion > GIANNI DI VENANZO's photography - screen...

GIANNI DI VENANZO's photography - screen caps


The most gorgeous of all Black and white cinematography for me is to be found in LA NOTTE. I have watched it again last night and paid special attention to framing, composition, and overall aesthetic qualities. The formal rigor of composition (perfect for urban architecture), the placement of actors within the frame, depth-of-field across plans from foreground to background... it's all gorgeous to watch and imbued with meaning. Though I tend to favor CinemaScope, the 1.66:1 ratio works perfectly. There is perfect symbiosis between ANTONIONI's vision and DI VENANZO's interpretation of said vision. I captured some frames and uploaded them... check out some shots:

http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/3797/bscap0066pp.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/5646/bscap0158jw.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/1056/bscap0232hn.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/8043/bscap0752go.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/4378/bscap0299nx.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/9094/bscap0350hi.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/2498/bscap0374gv.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/3918/bscap0513qb.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6387/bscap0601ff.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/5871/bscap0965al.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/23/bscap0984kv.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/5913/bscap1183qe.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/7119/bscap1505np.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/1549/bscap1564ki.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/198/bscap1574yi.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/1932/bscap1632fp.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/3079/bscap1682dq.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/2458/bscap1704ds.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/5728/bscap1853kt.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/9689/bscap1907hn.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/3158/bscap2042si.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/7255/bscap2272yz.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/1051/bscap2316ms.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/7730/bscap2402vl.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6668/bscap2425rk.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/8613/bscap2496ub.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/302/bscap2621wt.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/1181/bscap2679by.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/4007/bscap2737er.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/7439/bscap2959ka.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/3886/bscap3052zm.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/8522/bscap3142iq.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/5202/bscap3233ls.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/3922/bscap3320vs.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/8186/bscap3399rz.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/4361/bscap3490ic.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/3702/bscap3580se.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/1605/bscap3634fg.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6617/bscap3842cp.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/2015/bscap4043ka.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/8782/bscap4099tz.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/9614/bscap4114xg.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/499/bscap4207ip.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/2093/bscap4294ro.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/1354/bscap4408tt.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/5853/bscap4506ds.jpg
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/3527/bscap4573sy.jpg


Each of these have the potential to be standalone pictures. And none of those caps render justice to the actual film. It has to be seen in motion -- and in context as I argue in this thread:

http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000010/post/bd0000010


reply

I very glad you took the time to post these pics.

When soemone asks me what are the best looking films I've seen, I always remember La Notte leaving a sharp impression on me.

Many shots just take the breath away. I also think Kurosawa's Sanjuro particularly stands out, and the framing and composition reminds me a little of La Notte. Heads, limbs, shadows, all arranged in a striking fashion.

reply

I generally cite I Am Cuba as the best shot film i've ever seen, but I believe that it, more than probably any other film, really requires that you see it in motion. The camera demands it.

It terms of framing, Citizen Kane probably still takes the cake. Though My Life To Live is high up there.
___________________
Myspace classic cinema group:
http://groups.myspace.com/cinema101

reply

Great post, Antonioni's films always stun me in terms of visuals.. they don't seem to age at all.

http://z11.invisionfree.com/The_Fountain/index.php?act=idx
*Join the NEW film community*

reply

Wow! Thank you...

reply

WOW! Thank you! I thought the cinematography is magnificent for this film and to tell you the truth, that's the only thing that hook me to this film.


"Well, we put in wine because it's less noticeable. When it's in tea it has a distinct odor."

reply

Thanks for the caps!


This film is a real masterpiece and it has indeed an excellent cinematography. Antonioni was a master, no doubt about that!

reply

No doubt. I am with you. And I am not so much with that other post. And grasped it correctly, in between I was always thinking it actually would be (traditional) theatre. The way the figures are placed, static, and well-arranged. Plus, due to the medium, many additional perspectives and postures became available, and yet in a not-so-movie-but-theatre-style.
Plus, as you also wrote, some items that need to be in motion. Just watch it again and count the amount of the small human being above, below, behind, underneath a huge penetrating wall, window, balcony, etc.

reply