In my opinion....


NOT NAKED ENOUGH. This girl is quite beautiful, well, except when she's doing the ugly witch-face thing. Seems that most the starlets of this period were unfit looking with big asses and a fair amount of flab... I guess that was the look of the day, and went along with smoking two packs a day and living by the motto, "I'm sorry, but I don't do anything that causes me to sweat."

reply

I agree that during that time (late 50s early 60s filming for this movie is listed as '57) the styles and definitions of what was considered beautiful is very different from now. The overuse of "ruby" red lipstick and heavy eye shadow for starters. Anyway I agree with the Not Naked Enough. The title is intentionally a little deceptive.

edit update Also the general movie standards and policies about nudity in films was a bit more prudish back then for mainstream movies, even for B-Grade movies which this one would have been.

reply

I also agree with "not naked enough" and the blurring out the naked bits. I also found it to be too short as well.

Welcome to my Nightmare- Freddy Krueger

reply

This film could have benefited from the beautiful Libby Hall showing a lot more skin. The only time Hall really bared her tasty wares was when she was skinny dipping in the water.

I've been chasing grace/ But grace ain't easy to find

reply