MovieChat Forums > L'avventura (1961) Discussion > Is This Film Enjoyable?

Is This Film Enjoyable?


Other than the photography and the scene with the nude paintings I found L'Avventura to be almost entirely unenjoyable. Of course It is widely hailed as a masterpiece and I can see that it had some interesting themes and innovative construction among other things but those things didn't really come into play as enjoyment while I was watching the film. As I read why people consider this to be a great film it seems they cite it's themes and structure and mastery but often they come back to how empty it is. I'm not saying people who say they enjoy this film don't enjoy it I'm just wondering what it is they do enjoy, even if it's as simple as intellectual engagement. I expect L'avventura gets better with repeat viewings but I based on what I've read I can't expect to like it very much more than I already have.

reply

Love,

L'Avventura is a film I appreciate in a way that is different from most films. It is like entering a different world, but one with characters and their concerns with which I can relate. I experience such entering mesmerically, in fact. It is a reflective film, a cinematic exercise, that I find induces a visceral experience of it.

I enjoy the first half's primary location on the island Liscia Branca, and the feeling of both isolation and proximity to the characters, and they to each other. The performances especially of Monica Vitti, but also Lea Masseri and the rest of the cast, are excellent. Ferzetti grew on me with subsequent viewings as the male lead.

It is not a film to watch for the story telling, although of course it follows a rather unique, one might even argue at the time experimental, unconventional arc. The initial focus on Anna and her concerns seem to be ignored when she early on exits the film. But perhaps on repeat viewings it is even more apparent how she remains a sort of silent Greek chorus to the ensuing goings on - wondering when, eventually if, she will return has that effect. From her father's appearance on Liscia Branca, to look for her, to the invisible hands of his influence spurring on the investigation of her disappearance, we experience the social, even political, effect of her choice. I should note subseqent viewings confirmed my assessment that the film in fact explains what she did in disappearing, and certainly why. But we are also left to ponder if she really knew or should have known what to expect would result from her choice, whether impulsive or otherwise. Did she really intend this result?

But of course the film is not primarily about Anna, and the ambiguity portrayed by Monica Vitt as Claudia in the lead role is, in my opinion, exquisite. Beyond being wholly plausible, we see her ambiguous view of the "proceedings" run the gamut, not just conventionally between attraction (perhaps I should say acceptance of advances, albeit eventually with desire taking hold) and repulsion, but also confusion, ennui, agitation, flight, and on and on.

Many see in L'Avventura the lassitude of the characters as an example of their inner existential alienation, and there is that. but there is also a subtle desperation. Filmgoers today may tend to be less sympathetic to that sort of theme. But it is still reflective of the modern human condition. I find it in the end quite simply a film I strongly relate to.

And I love Monica Vitti. Heh.

reply

Now that I've made that comment I've given the film a lot of thought and kind of see how it can be enjoyable. I appreciate your in-depth answer which further expands my understanding of that perspective. I intend to watch L'avventura again someday and hopefully be more interested in it.

reply

I think it can be enjoyable if you get enjoyment out of strong filmmaking, but generally I'd say the film seeks to completely fly in the face of being entertaining. It's a sort of silent howl of despair, calling out in tones imperceptible to many to people who feel a similar way.

____
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p31aGy_jD3E&t=1m22s

reply

ibbi,

I suppose I agree with your observation, but not the possible implication that Antonioni INTENDED it to "fly in the face" of those who want films to be primarily about entertainment in some sort of simple minded sense. To be sure the making of this film was not intended to be about creating that kind of entertainment.

But rather than see it as intentionally opposed to that, I simply think the intent was to examine the Existential alienation of the characters. As such it is if you will beyond the simple question of whether it is entertaining. Of course as my previous post in this thread alludes to, I do find it entertaining, but not in a way even a well made spectacle film like say Gladiator does.

reply

I think it can be enjoyable if you get enjoyment out of strong filmmaking


Yep

Having an opinion can save your life. Just ask Marvin.

reply

Yes, if you're intelligent.

reply

I read about the mixed reception it got on Cannes and I expected a challenging film, like Last Year at Marienbad. Surprisingly, I enjoyed it very much. Didn't find it boring at all.

reply