MovieChat Forums > 13 Ghosts Discussion > Pretty entertaining film!!

Pretty entertaining film!!


Just watched this for the first time because I am a HUGE fan of the remake and I have to say, It was really cool to see where the premise came from! I think WIlliam Castle came up with a pretty cool concept for how the audience can choose what they see or not see. What was cool is I have one of those DVD essentials where you adjust your colors and it included a filter card that had red, green and blue on it! So I was totally able to re live what it was like in 1960!!

Overall, I think the film was well acted, well scripted and the twist with the lawyer at the end totally caught me by suprise. The effects were pretty cool on the ghosts too, of course, there was mroe than a few scenes where you can clearly see the wires, like for the fly, and the Ouija handpiece, but I can forgive stuff like that because of its age.

Overall, I give it a solid 8 out of 10. Im curious though, fans of this film, did you enjoy the remake? Do you think it honored the original? I think it did and I love how it went its own way too.

"You ONLY moved the headstones!! Why? WHY?!?"

reply

It's another delightfully dumb Castle picture, juvenile and amatuerish yet an infinitely more professional production than, say, STRAIT-JACKET.

A middleclass family in economic straits has been evicted yet again from their home, their furniture re-possessed (all in that lighthearted '50s way), when they learn their mysterious Uncle Plato Zorba has left them a haunted mansion in Los Angeles. Naturally, they move in without hesitation.

The ghosts' enslavement is given minimal explanation, the threadbare plot makes little sense, and Martin Milner as the crooked lawyer needs a few more Stanislovski classes before his cruising down Route 66 or busting heads on the streets of L.A. will be convincing.

But as a vaguely pederastic shyster, he's the creepiest thing in the movie. He is, after all, the 13th ghost; he's the title character.

Strong points: The lovely music score and Joseph Biroc's B&W cinematography give the movie more dignity than it really warrants, Margaret Hamilton always gives good witch, and Charlie Herbert is a really cute kid in an obviously Capricornian kind of way and an excellent child actor; I want to take him home and burp him to stave off the 40 years of drug abuse that awaits him in real life... And how do you not love Rosemary DeCamp (who played everybody's mother in nearly every TV sitcom ever made)?

The movie's effectiveness is a result that eerily doomed early-'60s, JFK-era (give-or-take), end of the world, TWLIGHT-ZONE/PSYCHO, traumatized child, nursery rhyme thing. Nothing's "purer" in its innocent creepiness, even though the violence and gore are at a minimum. It's the poignance of post-war optimism mixed with utter doom, shuddery and forlornly macabre. Even when in the fumbling hands of a non-auteur like William Castle.

It's hard to believe that this silly movie was once spooky as hell (I defined it, as a child, as "the second scariest movie I've ever seen", both first and second on my list having been photographed by the aptly-named Mr Biroc, though of course I didn't know that then). But the high-pitched voices of the superimposed ghosts on screen once left an indelible impression on the more naive audiences of an earlier bygone period. For years, I used to get the meat cleaver murder at the hands of the ectoplasmic chef confused with the meat cleaver murder of Bruce Dern during the plantation prologue soiree of HUSH... HUSH, SWEET CHARLOTTE.... I think it's the cook's toque...

Again, the era helps. It feels like a cozy Halloween party, one in which a lot of the pranks and games don't quite come off, but you had a good time anyway and you're glad you went.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbr6zm8uXM1qmvy8zo1_r1_500.gif

But I've never viewed it thru the ghostly "Illusion-O" goggles.

The same house, by the way, is also seen in 1944's strange little gem, THE CURSE OF THE CAT PEOPLE.

I've also never seen the entire 13 GHOSTS remake from ~40 years later. Clearly, it's of a different sensibility.

--



--

reply

Yes, this is a very fun movie that I don't think gets the recognition it deserves. While some of it was creepy, it never got too dark and had a light, fun, family atmosphere about it. I enjoyed the remake. I like how it kept the same basic storyline but changed it in a way so it wasn't a complete ripoff. It wasn't exactly the same, but it wasn't completely different either so I feel it did honor the original by doing it's own thing. But if I had to choose one or the other I'd choose the original because it's so fun.

Death lives in the Vault of Horror!

reply

I still remember the VHS box.

reply

A sweet and innocent spook film. Unheard of in modern cinema.


--

The most profound of sin is tragedy unremembered.

reply

[deleted]

The remake is fine. But I prefer the original, this is a pretty good classic horror movie. Well-acted, well-written and has a spooky atmosphere. Very underrated, the 6.1 rating seems a little too harsh.

reply