They shoulda called it "The Titannic Colossus". Or "The Enourmous Gargantua".
Redundant title!
Well...yes. But I'm willing to cut them some slack on that. It's likely that their target audiences back then didn't know what a behemoth was, unless they were biblical scholars or English majors (who were probably not their target audience!).
cinefreak
If a couple more of these had been made, only The Big Lizard would have remained as an option.
shareAs much as i think its redundant title yours are worse.
--------------
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for enough good men to do nothing.
I want to see the sequels: The Tiny Behemoth -- a huge monster is reduced to the size of an animal cracker when a scientific experiment goes horribly wrong. The monster vows revenge and eats the Incredible Shrinking Man. Then: The Medium-Sized Behemoth. The tiny behemoth of the previous film meets the White Rabbit and becomes the size of a man in a dinosaur suit, unleashing a fad of year-round Halloween parties among teenagers.
shareOoook you go lay down now and get a good rest
on location with SUPERMAN I,& OTHER STARS
http://www.vbphoto.biz/
They added Giant because most of the cast couldn't pronounce Behemoth. The acting wasn't bad but there's much of a script and the special effects were poor.
shareGigantic enormous colossal really big behemoth.
share[deleted]
Gargantuan Behemoth would have fallen more trippingly off the tongue.
Or perhaps Pantagruelian Behemoth.
Or Brobdignanian Behemoth.
Today, of course, it would be The Big Fuckin’ Behemoth. Welcome to Planet Single Entendre.