MovieChat Forums > The Wrong Man (1957) Discussion > Hitchcock's Unsung Masterpiece

Hitchcock's Unsung Masterpiece


From 1958 to 1963, Alfred Hitchcock made, arguably, a crowning group of masterpieces, each one very different from the one before, and yet oddly intersecting in theme, character, icons: Vertigo (1958), North by Northwest (1959), Psycho (1960), and The Birds (1963.) Masterpieces all (though I think "The Birds" was a bit below the others in quality of script).

But right before that immortal run of classics comes "The Wrong Man." And I think it belongs right up there with them. In its own way and for its own reasons.

"The Wrong Man" isn't a grand adventure like "North by Northwest" or a super-shocker like "Psycho." It doesn't play in the lush Technicolor dreamscape of "Vertigo" and it has none of the technical astonishments of "The Birds."

But "The Wrong Man" was made by the same team that made those movies after it: Hitchcock, music man Bernard Herrmann, cinematographer Robert Burks, editor George Tomasini. It LOOKS like those later films. It SOUNDS like those later films. It FEELS like those later films. And it predicts those later films. Consider:

1. In "The Wrong Man," Vera Miles has a breakdown and Henry Fonda, after being briefed on her condition by a shrink (Colonel Klink of Hogan's Heroes) leaves her in the asylum, walking down a darkening hall. In "Vertigo," James Stewart has a breakdown and Barbara Bel Geddes, after being briefed on his conditon by a shrink (Banker Drysdale of the Beverly Hillbillies), leaves her in the asylum, walking down a darkening hall.

2. In North by Northwest, New Yorker Roger Thornhill (Cary Grant) is wrongly accused of murder. In The Wrong Man, New Yorker Manny Ballestrero is wrongly accused of robbery. Oh, Roger's a few social stratums up from Manny, but they are both 50's New York men. Maybe Roger heard some music that Manny played at the Stork Club one night. And each man has a "uniform": for Roger, a silver-gray suit; for Manny, a heavy overcoat and a big hat.

3. "The Wrong Man," just like "Psycho" of two years later, is filmed in black-and-white, and postulates a bleak workaday world in which just trying to make ends meet is a grinding challenge, and a meager attempt to escape (on vacation, with money)...meets with criminal persecution. Also, Vera Miles is in both movies.

4. In "The Birds" as in "The Wrong Man," the villainy isn't a "he" or a "she." It's an "it": an oppressive universe that rises up against the heroes without rhyme or reason, with no ability on the hero's part to right that universe.

5. (Bonus) "Marnie" has a famous bad painting of a ship by an apartment house on Baltimore Harbor. "The Wrong Man" has a great REAL shot of a huge ship by an apartment house on New York Harbor.

---

All of these interconections and predictions just show how "The Wrong Man" fits perfectly into Hitchcock's oveure at the time.

But what makes it a masterpiece, to me, is Hitchcock's trenchant and unrelenting attempt here to tranform the "wrong man nightmare" of his entertainments into something oppressively REAL. The first 45 minutes or so of "The Wrong Man" -- as Manny is grabbed at his doorstep, paraded in front of witnesses, interrogated, arrested, and put into a tiny cell -- are possibly the most terrifying minutes in a Hitchcock movie this side of "Psycho" or "Frenzy."

There's real brilliance in how the friendly cops keep calling Manny "Chris." That's because the name on his license is Christopher Emmanuel Ballestrero, so they ASSUME he's Chris. We all assume things about people -- but when the cops assume, you're in real trouble.

Many legal protections for suspects have been put into place since "The Wrong Man" came out in '56 (based on a real '53 case.) But that doesn't remove the bureaucratic terrors of a system which -- once it has Manny in it clutches -- demands that he pull himself out. Hire a lawyer. Find witnesses. Go to trial. Hope you win.

After opening as a terrifying look at wrongful imprisonment (and I strongly believe that Manny IS innocent), "The Wrong Man" becomes a heartbreaking member of a key late 50's genre: the mental breakdown movie.

It's never been sadder than in "The Wrong Man." Look at the "Hitchcock rhyme": the first time Manny comes home to beautiful Rose in his bedroom, she is a vision of love and sexuality. The next time -- months after his arrest and trial preparation of lost witnesses and evidence -- she's in the same place, but all beauty is drained from her. She's going, going, gone.

Hitchcock's visual command in this film is as sure and powerful as in any other masterpiece of his. Look at the huge profile shots of the two cops blocking Manny on either side in their car (more ominous than the bad spies who block Cary Grant in the car in "North by Northwest.") The circling camera in Fonda's cell, and his trapped, desperate eyes through the cell slot. The dissolve -- on the portrait of Jesus to whom Manny likely prays -- to the right man's face.

Bernard Herrmann's music is more muted and "held back" than in the great Hitchcock films to follow; but as usual, it FITS. It is tense, forlorn, nervous, depressed music.

Hitchcock was here influenced by both Italian neo-realism ("The Bicycle Thief") and New York/New Jersey kitchen sink realism ("On the Waterfront"/"Marty.") The connection to "Marty" is most strong. Manny has Marty's same mother. (Come to think of it, Manny is an Italian. Why didn't Hitchcock cast Ernest Borgnine in this part? Or is he not Italian? Frank Sinatra?)

Hitchcock wanted to work with Henry Fonda for many years. He sought him for "Saboteur" and "Lifeboat," but to no avail. The two men only worked this once, but the match of Henry Fonda to THIS Hitchcock role was perfect, even if he wasn't really Italian-American. He's a good, sad, decent man. An actor of films of social justice. And yet...with just enough inhuman robotic movement of face and voice to suggest he MIGHT be a robber.

Hitchcock "lightly launched" Vera Miles in this film. He wanted to showcase her in "Vertigo," but lost her to pregnancy. Kim Novak was great in that film; but Vera Miles is great in THIS film. So beautiful, so innocent...so forlorn...so destroyed. Quite believably. (Miles would come back more famously in "Psycho," but in a much less in-depth role.)

A brilliant film. One of Hitchcock's most personal films. Likely his saddest film (even sadder than "Vertigo.") Great by any measure.

reply

I agree that this is one of Hitchcock's most unusual and unnerving movies, even though the theme of the film - the wrong man accused - is prevalent in quite a few of his works. It is one his most emotional films, agreed, sadder than Vertigo and more bleak too. If it's to be compared with any of his other movies, in terms of treatment of the subject, I would say "I Confess" with Montgomery Clift comes to mind. Both are beautiful visually in B&W, even though they are polar opposites in treatment of the subject. In "I Confess" the man is guilty trying to avoid being caught. In "The Wrong Man" the man is innocent trying to prove his innocence and catch the right man.

reply

I agree, just watched it in DVD format, and it looked just great. Amazing and totally believable performances from all the principles and marvelous location footage. A minor gem for sure. The 20 minute extra documentary is very interesting & informative as well. But...how did Hitchcock go from gritty B/W realism in this film, to a strange technicolor fantasy in his next (Vertigo)?...Weird! Oh yes, by the way...there is no doubt that Vera Miles would have been an excellent Madeleine/Judy...what a performance!! (And I still stay that Joseph Cotten would have been a better Scotty! But the script could have used some improvements too).

Regards,

RSGRE

reply

But...how did Hitchcock go from gritty B/W realism in this film, to a strange technicolor fantasy in his next (Vertigo)?...Weird!

---

I think this is one of the keys to Hitchcock's greatness and long career.

Audiences simply could not predict Hitchcock's "mood" from movie to movie. His individual style was always notably there from movie to movie, but he would keep throwing "curve balls" in terms of the mood, "texture" and techniques of his movies, one after the other.

Think of the man's IMAGINATION. How he could "see" "The Wrong Man" as a grim b/w vision and then "Vertigo" as a lush Technicolor one?

You've got "Psycho" looking like a cross between a 50's TV show and a Universal horror movie from the forties; with "The Birds" a rather lovely and lyric study in green, turquoise and sea blue. "Marnie" with its tilted angles and melodramatic storms, is followed by "Torn Curtain," filmed in gauzy gray light to simulate "natural lighting."

Hitchcock's mind was an amazing creative chamber....

reply

totally agree, this is vastly underrated.

reply

I found this film to be lackluster in every way possible. Nothing struck me as great, but noting struck me as horribly bad either. I liked the look of the film, but that was about it. I think that this has no place among Rear Window and especially Vertigo.

http://moviedudemovies.blogspot.com/

Last Film Seen: The Bucket List(***/****)

reply

ecarl,
i really enjoyed reading your comments. well thought out. yr. a true hitch fan and observer.

my only complaint about the film was the wife going nuts. two reasons why it was included, i think:

1. it truly happened in the real-life story. note real-life doesn't always add up to good stories.

2. it was included to show how the experience of being wrongly accused effects more than just the accused. the family was marked by the false accusation.

that said, I just didn't buy into her insanity. seemed silly and hackneyed. for that reason it is definitely a lower rung hitchcock. maybe haveing her abandon the husband, due to stress would be more believable to me, but insanity seemed too over the top.

Boy I really loved the first 40 minutes tho'. I was feeling his powerlessness. that coupled with the near neo-realist approach kept reminding me this is not a north by northwest action thriller. there is no way out. no heroic feats to save him. very scary to me for that reason.

reply

1. it truly happened in the real-life story. note real-life doesn't always add up to good stories.

2. it was included to show how the experience of being wrongly accused effects more than just the accused. the family was marked by the false accusation.


The reasons were...BOTH.

that said, I just didn't buy into her insanity. seemed silly and hackneyed. for that reason it is definitely a lower rung hitchcock. maybe haveing her abandon the husband, due to stress would be more believable to me, but insanity seemed too over the top.

Well when I saw the film for the first time I too didn't feel it right. But then I saw it again and now it completely fits. The reason is a key scene that everyone forgets. When they visit the attorney's office for the first time and he's telling his story the camera has a two shot with Vera Miles and Henry Miles facing the camera. And then Manny delivers a key dialogue that probably served as one of the main triggers for what happened.

See for yourselves and find out.

But it's definitely a great film, one of his most formally inspired and controlled film.

The point of the whole breakdown is well that it makes a joke of that cop's dictum that 'an innocent man has nothing to fear'. Well as Hitchcock reveals in this film, an innocent man has EVERYTHING to fear even in a law system that says everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

It also has to do with class. Manny is working class and obviously the cops already worked out their suspicions that he did it because he was poor and in the final courtscene the prosecutor makes a point that that Manny stole money to pay bookies for his horse bets. The same treatment would be unlikely to have been given to a middle class or upper class wrong man. Or in the case of a middle class wrong man(like Roger Thornhill) an elaborate mindnumbing plot that is unlikely to happen in real life yet Thornhill comes out on top better off than before, while Manny accussed for a much minor crime loses almost everything in addition to being permanently scarred.




How much is a good nights sleep worth?

reply





I don't know why anyone would have a hard time finding it unrealistic to lose one's mind after the ''bad luck'' they received. I'd go off on a paranoid craze too.

I tiptoe through the tulips

reply

You are less than convincing. many people have family members who do horrible things or are victims of horrible things and they don't go insane. like i said not realistic or convincing.

reply

[deleted]



Well, people do handle stress differently, but the more I think about this, the more over-the-top it seems.



I tiptoe through the tulips

reply

I think the movie makes the point that this family was stressed to the breaking point BEFORE Manny was arrested as "the wrong man."

He works a night job that has him coming home on a (dangerously?) empty subway in the early morning to a wife who has been up all night. Money's tight, there are children to feed, and Rose needs tooth work done that Manny cannot pay for. Hence, Manny goes to borrow off their insurance policy and...

Rose herself tells Manny that she feels this whole thing is punishment for HER wrongdoing. Failures as a wife, a mother, a supporter of her husband making a decent living. Rose believes that their financial problems INVITED disaster into their lives. All of this guilt was probably festering in Rose before Manny was arrested.

This is a very sad movie, and, again, in my opinion, a Hitchcock masterpiece. Its not for nothing that it is only one film before "Vertigo," "North by Northwest" and "Psycho."

reply

I've just watched this film and I'm pretty much mesmerized. This is not what I expected. It's one of the most effective films I've seen and it reminded me of films by Vittorio De Sica like 'Umberto D.' and 'Ladri di biciclette'. I love the long shots. Hitchcock truly was an artist.

reply

This logic is flawed. An analogy:
Many people don't develop cancer.
But that doesn't mean that no one ever develops cancer.
And it doesn't mean that a film character who has cancer is unrealistic or unconvincing.

reply

Well, it's taking me a week to watch the first 30 minutes in short bits. Too scary--kind of a gestapo vibe from the cops, and the whispering women are scary, too. Like watching a person snoozing nicely while a tarantula walks ups the covers toward his neck. So I appreciate your comments and all the others. Having a virtual audience to sit with through each excruciating moment will help. As my good friend used to to say, "Hey, it's just a movie."
But as you all point out, WHAT a movie. Gorgeous and quietly powerful.

reply

I like your comments about the "scariness" of "The Wrong Man."

I've ALWAYS felt it was a truly terrifying movie, just in a different way from "Psycho."

Imagine if it happened to you....

reply

[deleted]

I too am in agreement with the OP. Highly underrated and powerful film.
Good rundowns here which remind me of aspects of it I didn't notice before and thus lead me to appreciate it even more.

reply

I just watched it on British TV.
What a brilliant film, draws you in....
Vera Miles was excellent in her depiction of the relentless slide into the dark well - I've seen similar in reality & it's really scary.

reply

Just watched this film on BBC2.
I thought I knew of all Hitchcocks films of the 50s and early 60s but I had never heard of this one never mind seen it. Very poignant as it was based on a true story and well made to boot.
For me it lacked the suspense of other Hitchcock films like Psycho or Rear Window but you can only retell the facts as they happen so its no fault of the film. Certainly worth a look.

reply

I watched the film today on BBC2 as well and immediately fell in love with it. It really is terrific.

Maturity. The very staple of the IMDb message boards.

reply

Bump.

reply

This film is underrated by IMDb users, no doubt about that.

What I'd like to know is what you make of the scene of Manny in his cell. In the head-on view of him, we are treated to a spinning image with Manny at its center. Do you think Hitch intended this for our benefit as an indication of Manny's general disorientation (as the red washes express Marnie's panic for us even if she doesn't see red herself) or as a literal depiction of Manny's psychological state?

reply


I think its more of an indication of Manny's general disorientation. Spinning image is quite common in Hitchcock films. I think Hitchcock first started this in Rich and Strange (1931). Then we see spinning coin in a bowl in Secret Agent (1936). Then in Strangers on a Train (1951) and The Wrong Man (1956). After that, we see Spinning image in the opening titles for Vertigo (1958).

I read somewhere that he shot spinning image like whirlpool in Poe's short story "A Descent into Maelstrom."

reply

Spinning image is quite common in Hitchcock films.

Agreed, and I already gave an example of Hitch's "general disorientation" approach in the case of Marnie. Anyone see this differently?

reply

The funny thing is that, in their famous interview together, Francois Truffaut (after pages and pages of genuflecting before Hitchcock's genius) actually challenges Hitchcock's choice on the spinning camera around Fonda, suggesting that a documentary-style straight-on shot of Fonda just sitting there would be more effective in this "semi-documentary" film.

Hitchcock bristles a bit, and finally says: "It seems to me that you want me to work for the art houses."

Funny thing is: most of Hitchocck's movies ARE art, and the ones that were re-released in the 80's DID play the art houses.

I think that Hitchcock definitely wanted this intense, surreal, and terrifying effect at precisely this time in the movie...Manny has been SO cooperative, every step of the way, to no avail. Now he is forcibly taken to the cell(with Hitchcockian POV shots of the approaching door), let in...the spinning camera is exactly the right effect at exactly the right time.

And "The Wrong Man" rarely plays like a documentary. There is Hitchcockian style all the way.

Example: How each of the two cops sitting alongside Manny in the cop car are given huge "close-ups in profile." Each man's head looks like it belongs on Mount Rushmore...and each man's head is claustrophobic, blocking Manny's escape from the cop car.

reply

Wonder if that spinning cam´ra thing in The Wrong Man could be the point from where De Palma developped his fascination with this technique that so prominently figures in Carrie, Blow Out, Body Double... and probably elsewhere, too. Those are the 3 I recall at the moment.

"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

That makes a lot of sense to me.

reply

And bump.

reply

That seems likely to me also. Then again, if we were to list what techniques of Hitch's inspired De Palma, this would be one lengthy thread. Someone posted a thought on a movie board--possibly Spellbound--that De Palma seems to take a certain scene(s) from Hitchcock pictures and flesh them out into his own feature films. I won't disagree. Not that any director, or artist is above influence by a forerunner's work, but De Palma has taken it quite far.

For these reasons, I don't like to mention De Palma or his films when people ask for suggestions of Hitchcock-like thrillers. I'd rather suggest certain German expressionist films by Lang or Siodmak: The Spiral Staircase for example, or the noirish Niagara. In any case, I do enjoy one of De Palma's films. It happens to be one he had more extensively planned out than usual before he shot a single scene--sound familiar? It's Carrie.

reply

The cinematography, of course, is excellent but I think this movie is not entirely successful .


------- __@
----- _`\<,_
---- (*)/ (*)------- ----__@
--------------------- _`\<,_
---- -----------------(*)/ (*)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:*•.. ¤°.¸¸.•´¯`»nec spe,nec metu :*•.. ¤°.¸¸.•´¯`»

reply

I found it quite suspenseful, partly because the handwriting revelation made me suspect that he might be guilty. With Hitchcock you never know what he’s going to pull out of the bag, but the surprise was actually that this is a dark and sad film about wrongful accusation and how it ruins lives.

For all Hitch’s flare, this one showed he can tell a very simple true life story with immense power - it’s gripping and delivers a surprising emotional wallop.

reply

Did you notice there is an actress who is in throth* "The Wrong Man", "North by Northwest" and "The Birds"?

She's also in one of the episodes of Alfred Hitchcock Presents.

* well, whats the word equivalent of both, but for three things?

reply

The actress is Doreen Lang, and I expect Hitchcock personally valued her work in "The Wrong Man" so much that he sought her out for those two slightly later pictures.

She plays roughly the same TYPE of character in "The Wrong Man" and "The Birds" -- a simpering, over-anxious, near-hysterical woman whose fear is contagious to those around her. In "The Wrong Man," this is most ironic: because she misidentifies Fonda as the robber, her fearfulness is actually...menacing?

In "The Birds," her fear stems from her being a mother alone with her two children(the husband is missing...long gone?) and she confronts Melanie as being "the cause of all this."

Only in "North by Northwest" was Doreen Lang given a role of calm and practicality. She's Roger Thornhill's secretary in the opening scene. Back then, a man could order a woman around like this, and a woman could be that servile. We still have secretarys today, but we call them "assistants," and I doubt that many women let men get away with such casual domination...unless they get paid a lot and the man is a big shot Silicon Valley type, I suppose.

Hitchcock didn't "repeat" supporting players all that much, but he definitely did with a few: Leo G. Carroll did a record six Hitchocck films; John Williams did two. A man named Malcolm Atturbury is the farmer by the crop duster in North by Northwest("That plane's dusting crops where there ain't no crops") and the sheriff in "The Birds"("That's a bird, alright.") Mort Mills was the highway cop in "Psycho" and the fake farmer/spy in "Torn Curtain." On the distaff side, Doreen Lang may have been the big repeater with three.

Am I wrong?

reply

bump

reply

I agree with the op...
great movie... Great job by Hitchcock

great performance by Vera Miles.
great performance by Henry Fonda..

and it was nice seeing Werner Klemperer.

reply

bump

reply

May contain SPOILERS

Ecarle - I enjoyed reading your thoughtful and interesting OP. The idea of losing your freedom for a crime you didn't commit is the stuff nightmares are made of. When you couple that with financial pressures and wondering whether you can even afford a lawyer, the stress would be unbearable. I think we are more informed today, and wouldn't be as cooperative as Manny, yet who knows what they would do when completely innocent. When they attempt to find witnesses and every avenue is a dead end, the wife begins to lose hope and feel doomed. I can imagine how devastating that must have been. The only thing that saved him is the faith his employer and lawyer had in him, and of course that the real guilty party continued to commit robberies. Otherwise who knows how the case could have gone. Scary stuff indeed.

reply

[deleted]

A much belated thank you!

---

The idea of losing your freedom for a crime you didn't commit is the stuff nightmares are made of. When you couple that with financial pressures and wondering whether you can even afford a lawyer, the stress would be unbearable.

---

Yes, I think the massively oppressive power of The Wrong Man comes from its TWIN dangers: the wrongful incarceration AND the financial stress. Many thrillers had the wrongfully accused man, but to add the realities of financial stress was to go to a new, and quite horrible place, for Hitchcock. Psycho is less depressing, even with its several characters working dead end jobs.

---

I think we are more informed today, and wouldn't be as cooperative as Manny, yet who knows what they would do when completely innocent.

---

Poor Manny assumes his innocence will prevail, and that the cops will believe him. But they are trained NOT to believe people.

Modernly, certain legal safeguards are in place -- Miranda warnings above all -- but I think we all know to lawyer up even if we're innocent.

reply

bump

reply

It's a fine film with a great performance by Henry Fonda. Not one of my favourite Hitchcocks, though - thanks at least in part to Vera Miles, whom i found just awful in this.

reply