MovieChat Forums > Night of the Demon (1958) Discussion > Big mistake to show the demon

Big mistake to show the demon


Cheapened the whole film. Scariest scene was the cloud chasing Andrews. No demon seen, just eerieness.

reply

I don't know, those scenes where we see the demon from the distance were pretty creepy.

reply

[deleted]

I totally agree and I think showing the demon is one of the reason this movie is considered one of the greatest horror movies ever.

reply

this movie IS a classic. The atmosphere in it is fantastic! The wicked, arrogant attitude of devil cult leader Julian Karswell is really eye opening and a big contrast to that of skeptic John Holden. The acting is superb! The demon materialising from smoke and growing bigger and more sinister looking makes this a movie that will keep people awake at night.

reply

I don't think that the demon should have been shown. Takes away the natural creepiness of the film somehow. For me anyway.

reply

I remember as a kid reading an old book about horror films (probably published 60s) that said Tourneur was either forced by the studio to add the image of the demon or the studio added the image after it was completed. Can't remember which; but I do remember Tourneur didn't want it. He wanted the mood to carry it.

reply

He didn't want the close ups of the demon to be shown, he had no problems with those far away shots of the creature.

reply

[deleted]

Not showing the Demon at all, as Tourneur wanted (having been influenced in the horror genre by Val Lewton) wouldn't have worked, in my opinion. Showing it in full only at the very end would have been best. And perhaps with fewer appearances, the budget for Demon models/masks could have gone farther, giving us a much better Demon.

Though knowing the Demon was real from the start did add something to the whole story. When you know the whole time that Holden is wrong about Karswell being a phony, and is walking closer and closer to a diabolical fate, it ratchets up the suspense.

reply

I disagree. I think that confirming the legitimacy of the witchcraft at the beginning kills the suspense, and almost all of the ambiguity. Although (fortunately) if you watch the movie closely, the ambiguity almost still holds up. It can almost be interpreted that the death at the end is psychological, and that it was only a train, and that the demon the audience sees is only symbolic to drive up the ambiguity.

Almost.





I'm not a control freak, I just like things my way

reply

I saw the movie last weekend, coming in during the airplane scene. I was really enjoying it until they showed the monster. It rather spoiled the movie for me.

reply

You're right. Another scary scene is where Holden is in the hotel corridor,eery noise but no monster in sight but very frightening.

reply

I think they showed it too soon. It would've been better if we were unsure whether or not everything that happened was coincidence until the end. But the demon was so cool looking (especially for 1957) that it didn't really hurt the film for me. I still enjoyed it very much.

reply

i vote for the demon!

reply

Same here; I think the demon's formation out of the mist has to have inspired the famous Japanese Kaiju 'King Ghidorah'--in fact his appearing out of the fireball & his giggling chitter seems to be almost a "tribute";






Why can't you wretched prey creatures understand that the Universe doesn't owe you anything!?

reply

The demon worked for me, although it might not have if this had been a color picture which might have made the special effects look chintzier. It was far more believable than the leopard that "attacked" Andrews--here it would have been better to stick to noises and shadows.

There's a light (Over at the Frankenstein place)--The Rocky Horror Picture Show

reply


Yes, although I could have been okay with just a distant view. The close up with really cheesey.



😎



"I Am the FBI."

reply