I haven't seen "farewell to arms" in its entirely. yet, from the footage I have seen, the film appears to be a big campy, kitschy "messterpiece." Gaudy color photography, overwrought acting, overblown emotional scenes that aren't even in the book. In other words, the works. Charles Vidor might have thought he was creating high art, yet the other people involved in the film (including the screenwriters) probably had no such delusions. So it IS conceivable that an off-color "bad taste" joke was inserted amongst the rest of the "bad taste" material. Especially considering the fact that this joke would only be "gotten" by members of the gay population, not by the general public. As for Rock Hudson as leading man and any possible "slight" to his reputation, (a) Hudson didn't take his acting or his status as leading man completely seriously, and in this film in particular he seems to be overacting, camping it up a bit, and (b) as I indicated earlier, probably the only people who would "get" the in-joke were those who were gay themselves. It wasn't as if Hudson was being "outed" in a serious context. It was more a case of adding one more kitsch element to what already was a kitsch project. (In other words, the writers knew the in-joke was lame, stupid, ridiculous, and unnecessary. That's why they included it, along with the rest of the material they knew was lame, stupid, and ridiculous.)
reply
share