MovieChat Forums > The Enemy Below (1958) Discussion > Only saw part of it - didn't they have t...

Only saw part of it - didn't they have torpedoes?


I guess I have no excuse for asking something that was probably explained in the movie, but I took a phone call while it was playing on tv so I turned the sound off and missed a lot of the film. It seemed like the Americans were lobbing these depth charges into the air from their ship that would then sink down in the general direction of the submarine and explode. All the ones I saw exploded quite near to the surface of the water and way too far away to hit the sub. I kept wondering, "Why don't they use their sonar and launch torpedoes at the sub? They're right on top of them. Lobbing depth charges seemed very unlikely to get the job done." And why was black smoke coming out of the Uboat? Was that some kind of camouflaging ink to hide the sub's position or were they actually hit?

Anyway sorry kind of lame for me to ask this without watching the rest but if anyone cares to take pity on me I'd appreciate it.

reply

Actually, you are asking the right question about the wrong vessel.

Early in the movie the point was made that the ship didn't have any tubes (torpedoes) so that answers your question.

But I was wondering why the sub didn't fire more torpedoes at the ship that was chasing it? I know they fired them from aft early in the movie and that supposedly the aft tubes were hard to reload, but the Germans must have been able to reload those tubes during the many hours of the pursuit. Further, the movie showed torpedoes aft inside the ship, so we know it didn't run out.

They made a big deal about the sub needing to turn into the ship to fire, yet it definitely had rear tubes as demonstrated early in the movie. Hmmm....

reply

Thank you, that was the piece I missed. Interesting about the sub not firing more torpedoes.

reply

Actually, depth charges were the most widely used ASW weapon in WWII, and if you used them right, they'd work very nicely. In fact, the US Navy in WWII very carefully studied things like search patterns, size of areas that could productively be patrolled, which depth charge patterns were most effective, etc. Another thing is that depth charges were not the weak little firecrackers that you see in the movies. In movies like this, Run Silent, Run Deep, and others, you see depth charges going off ten feet from the boat, and maybe the boat keels over for a moment. In reality, there's two or three hundred pounds of high explosive in each of those charges. If a REAL depth charge went off that close to your boat, your ass was fish food. Those big splashes on the surface when they went off? Water conducts the energy of the explosion much better than air does. That's actually what it looks like on the surface when a depth charge goes off three hundred feet down.

Another thing is that most torpedoes at that time were unguided beyond simple depth control mechanisms. I don't recall exactly, but I don't think the first homing torpedoes were fielded until 1943-44ish, and those were simple homing torpedoes with microphones in the nose, which homed in on the loudest noise they heard. They weren't the kind of targetable, retargetable weapons we have today. And because they'd home in on any noise they heard, any ship or submarine that fired one had to stop its engines first. Not a good situation to be in if there's someone else coming after you. I'm not sure, but I think a lot of those homing torpedoes might have been air-dropped, because then you don't have the problem of the torpedo potentially homing on its launching vessel.

And the black stuff coming out of the sub was fuel oil being dumped to sea, making a slick that could confuse the destroyer's sonar.

When a loose cannon flogs a dead horse, there's the Devil to pay!

reply

Thank you so much for that detailed and highly knowledgeable explanation. I think it may just be the way they filmed it that made the depth charges seem so ineffective. Or perhaps it was just the parts I watched. They all seemed to go so wide of the mark.

In other films about WWII submarine warfare I have enjoyed, like Das Boot and Below, we are looking through the eyes of the protagonists on the submarine and the depth charges are absolutely terrifying. Each time another one is fired from a ship on the surface not only is the whole sub crew stock still, holding their breath silently while they wait to see if they will be hit, but I found myself holding my breath as well. I could see the terrible power of the depth charges in a way that was utterly gripping. In this film they just didn't seem to be able to aim them very well, perhaps because they did not have a good sonar picture on where the sub was.

I thought the black stuff was oil, but it also seemed they were releasing it deliberately (as opposed to a puncture in the tank) so your explanation confirms that. I was thinking it was almost like an octopus defense!

It's true most of my understanding of torpedoes comes from Tom Clancy novels and these are clearly from a much more recent stage of torpedo design and capability.

Thank you for giving me such an informed perspective.

reply

You're welcome. There's definitely some cinematographic license taken in these movies. You have to show the depth charges being that close, or the audience may not perceive the danger of it.

There's also the fact that the exact timing of the release of a depth charge pattern was still more art than science, because the destroyer loses sonar contact as it passes over top of the sub, it takes time for the charges to sink to depth (early or late release, charges set too deep or too shallow = miss), and the destroyer captain really only has his sonar operator's best guess as to what depth to set his charges for in the first place. And all the operator really has to work with is a set of ear phones, a microphone, and a dial to tell him which direction his microphone is pointed, and thus where the sound is coming from. They didn't have any of those fancy displays and computers to help them like they did in The Hunt for Red October.

Das Boot really did a good job of showing what a terrifying experience it was to be on a U-boat under attack. They could hear the destroyer coming and hear the splashes of the "wasserbombs", and there was very little they could do about it. They couldn't outrun the destroyer, shooting the destroyer on its attack run would take far too long to set up, and trying to outmaneuver the destroyer would be pointless because the destroyer would still be able to track them. You could try to dive under the eggs, or you could go silent and try to lose him that way (but if you were being pinged that was pointless), or you could release oil to try and confuse his sonar, but really all you could do was wait and pray to God that none of those ash cans had your number on it today. And Das Boot especially does a terrifyingly good job of showing how hard it can be, waiting to live or die.

Try reading RAdm Samuel Eliot Morison's book, "The Two-Ocean War". It's a rather goood one-volume condensation of the battle history of the US Navy in WWII. Operations against German U-boats take up a fair portion of the book, and he neatly describes both the operational, educational, and technical progression that the Navy had to make in order to beat Adm. Doenitz and his boys.

When a loose cannon flogs a dead horse, there's the Devil to pay!

reply

Thanks so much for that and the book recommendation. I will check it out.

reply

It's a good book. It's a nice compromise between a full-on history text and, say, a streamlined docu-drama like Tora! Tora! Tora! or Midway. Enjoy.

When a loose cannon flogs a dead horse, there's the Devil to pay!

reply

I have some doubt about the oil spill.

In most submarine movies, the emission of oil was basically a ruse to 'play dead'.

A spot of oil and some floating debrits surfaced to simulate a ruptured hull, so the destroyer would stop the attack - and wait, or run back to the convoy.

I'm not sure that any amount of oil in the water could 'spoof' any sonar, even the most rudimental ones in WWII.

reply

The DE had torpedoes but at what depth would they be set to hit? The sub may have released some diesel fuel to mislead the DE and it may create a false echo due to the difference in density. The DE WOULD have had "Hedgehog" ahead thrown contact projectiles, but they would have shortened the film considerably! One thing I see is that, being one day out of Trinidad, the DE could have called for air support. The were well within range of land based air power. As is mentioned, the book is written "earlier in the war and the Allied ship is not a formidable DE but a much less capable type of vessel.

reply

You were not paying attention, the German crew looking through the recognition manual say "no tubes". Besides WW 2 surface ships could not torpedo a submerged sub. Just depth charges or hedgehogs.

reply

There were no anti-sub torpedos until the end of the war. ASW weapons were depth charges and later hedgehog batterise. Those were forward firing mortar bombs that only exploded on contact. If you look really closely, you can see the hedgehog launchers along side Mount 32 in front of the pilot house.

reply