Money Lender
The money lender gets 3/4 of the crop and 20 acres as interest on 500 "bucks" (subtitle translation) which I assume is rupees of the time (1900 to 1920?). Is that as ridiculously high as it seems? Could someone translate those numbers into annual wages, cost of living, something a clueless American can understand in the present day?
Also - how did the money lender keep his monopoly? One would think there would be competition, or that villagers would lend to each other. The social isolation implied by the movie (neighbors NOT helping neighbors, such as clearing boulders from a field without help) must have been crippling to development and escaping from poverty. Perhaps it still is, in parts of India.
Ah well. In spite of 500 million people still trapped in abject poverty in India, and abuses that break my heart, millions are climbing out of poverty every year. I hope some of my projects can help accelerate this.