MovieChat Forums > Helen of Troy (1956) Discussion > Warnercolor and other colour processes

Warnercolor and other colour processes


One of the reviewers makes a big deal about Warnercolor and all over IMDB people are confused, so here is a simplified version:


Prior to about 1950 Technicolor used a three strip process which, briefly, entailed the simultaneous exposing of three rolls of b/w film in a modified camera shot through colour filters.
Final prints were produced by a dye-transfer process which tended to produce vivid colours - although it was possible to achieve more subtle effects.

During World War II the German company Agfa perfected a single-strip colour film.

After the war the Agfa patents were treated as war booty and numerous other companies were able to use the same technology including Eastman Kodak, Ansco, Gevaert and Fuji, as well as Agfa.

The Agfa-derived film stock's advantages over three strip Technicolor included being able to use standard, less cumbersome cameras, and being cheaper and simpler to process. Technicolor had also charged high license fees and imposed often draconian rules over how their process could be used - there were no such problems with the Agfa-derived processes.

For these reasons, after about 1950 three-strip Technicolor in effect became obsolete and ceased to be a unique process except in one respect: SOME final prints destined for prestigious venues of SOME films bearing the name Technicolor were still produced by the dye transfer process. In all other respects a film bearing the name Technicolor was shot and processed exactly like most others.

Any film which says something like Eastmancolor or Anscocolor or Fuji etc used the same process and so did Technicolor - all of their films after 1950 and some of them before.

Some films have a credit something like "Color by DeLuxe" "Processed by Rank Film Laboratories", Metrocolor or Warnercolor. All this means is that one of the above, essentially identical, Agfa-derived film stocks was processed at a laboratory of that name using essentially the same process and printing techniques as any film lab, famous or not, anywhere in the world. Of course, some labs were more proficient than others, but they were all carrying out the same processes.

Whatever the name of the process, with the exception of three strip Technicolor pre-1950, the way the film was exposed and lit and the aesthetic decisions made in grading had more of an effect on the final look of a film than the name of the essentially-identical colour processes.

It is only in recent years that a growing number of films have departed from the processes outlined above by using Digital Intermediates and/or other digital stages in post-production, but many films are still shot and processed in essentially the same way as they would have been at any time post-WW2.

reply

[deleted]

I recall seeing the trailer for "Rebel without a Cause" and other Warnercolor films in theatres and to me the color was a bit too red and yet on TV it looked fine.
I guess the TV cameras corrected it.



See some stars here
http://www.vbphoto.biz/

reply

Alas, as color film stock became easier to process, the means to accurately restore films to their original color glory became more difficult.

The old Technicolor process meant that their were always 4 negatives for any frame of film: magenta, cyan, yellow and black. Assembling these later negatives for restoration purposed meant that basic color values were accurate.

The "one-stock-fits-all" color film is not so easily or accurately restorable.

One restorer (can't remember who) proclaimed he would/could not restore any film after "My Fair Lady" (1964).

One of my film professors told me that a film like "The Godfather" (1972) is very difficult to restore because the single color negative has actually faded. There is no way to correctly gauge the color values of the film in its original release.

"Don't call me 'honey', mac."
"Don't call me 'mac'... HONEY!"

reply

you are wrong on certain points.

many pre-war home movies (16mm) were shot in single-process color, including behind-the-scenes footage of charlie chaplin filming The Great Dictator (a b&w film).

also, much in-the-field war footage was shot in color as modern documentaries have proven -- it's just that color was too costly for distribution, so the newsreels stayed black and white.

reply

For the sake of brevity - and because its use in professional feature film production has been negligible - I didn't say anything about reversal film. Most home movie and some newsreel footage was shot with reversal footage - like the material you mention - but was very little used for features.
What I was talking about were the negative/positive processes used on virtually all colour feature films which weren't three-strip Technicolor.

reply