MovieChat Forums > The Eddy Duchin Story (1956) Discussion > Chronology problems in this film

Chronology problems in this film


Despite its good cinematography and location shooting, there is little sense of time in THE EDDY DUCHIN STORY. The city scenes look exactly the same regardless of the years depicted, with just a few varied vintages of vehicles shown in a weak effort to impart a thin veneer of different decades (and there are some goofs there as well, with mid-50s cars seen in scenes taking place in the early 30s and late 40s). There is little sense of changes in styles to show the passing years. Most glaring of all, nobody in this film ages a day (with the unavoidable but limited exception of Peter Duchin, played by plot necessity by two different child actors). Ty Power, James Whitmore, and all the others who pass throughout the film look exactly the same in the early 1950s as they did in the late 1920s. The few items tossed into the film to try to give a sense of era, such as the newspaper headline about Lindbergh during the opening credits, are superficial and artificial and only highlight the film's lack of depth and any feel for time or era. Very poor job on that, another example of the directorial incompetence of the wildly overpraised George Sidney.

reply

I just watched George Sidney's film "The Eddy Duchin Story" this weekend - on a normal TV, not a flat-screen TV nor a theatre screen. I do think that there were modifications made re: Mr. Power's screen makeup between the beginning of the film to its end; at that point he looks age-appropriate. Ms. Novak's screen makeup is quite a bit different in this film than in others (especially "Vertigo"), more subtle. Can't vouch for the excellent James Whitmore - as usual, he disappears right into the character. Concerning George Sidney's films, some of them are programmers - but didn't he direct "Kiss Me, Kate" - which is quite a bit more than a programmer?

reply

Power changes very little in the film. One problem is that he was almost 42 when filming this movie, so having to play a man in his late teens (Duchin was born in 1909, and the film opens at the time of Lindbergh's flight in 1927) was necessarily unconvincing: he looked nothing like someone in his 20s, let alone a teenager. Obviously he looks more "age appropriate" in the latter part of the film as by that point Power was Duchin's actual age (more or less).

James Whitmore was an excellent actor but he didn't "disappear" into the role to the point where his looking precisely the same in the early 50s as in the late 20s is unnoticeable. They didn't even bother to gray his hair, and he was supposed to be older than Duchin, so his failure to age a day is in fact quite glaring -- actually, the most obvious of anyone in the film.

Kim Novak looked fine but as far as aging goes, her character died young, so the entire issue of her being made-up to look older is non-existent.

The movie, too, has absolutely no sense of time or place, or any feel for the passage of decades, other than in the most superficial, unconvincing way.

Sidney was an important director but my comment has nothing to do with whether he was directing programmers or major films. I've usually found him to be a rather heavy-handed, often over-the-top director, lacking the finesse of Vincente Minnelli or the inventiveness of Stanley Donen, to cite two other directors who came out of MGM, as had Sidney. He had some major flops (Pepe being the most notorious), but even his good pictures (and of course he had successes) often could have been better handled by others, or the material was strong enough that he couldn't do it any harm. Some people like Robert Osborne inexplicably think he was terrific but when you look at the body of his work he has a lot of poorly done films as well as some good ones.

reply

Also Larry Keating was way too old to be playing bandleader Leo Reisman. Leo was 30 in 1927 but Keating was near 60 when this was made.

reply

Yes -- very good point. Also, Shepperd Strudwick, who plays "Sherman Wadsworth" (a fictionalized W. Averell Harriman, the diplomat who at the time the movie was made was Governor of New York), was 48 when filming this movie, while the real-life Harriman was 35 in 1927. And like everyone else in this film, Strudwick ages not a day in a story that takes place over nearly a quarter of a century.

reply