MovieChat Forums > 1984 Discussion > better than I expected (spoilers )

better than I expected (spoilers )


this version of the story is available on dvd in the UK at the moment (March 2007).

I had heard it was not very good but felt I had to buy it because the story has always fascinated me and I am a fan of the 1954 BBC tv version and the 1984 film version.
So I bought the DVD and I must say it is a lot better than I expected it to be.

I thought they changed the ending to show Smith shouting down with big brother as he is shot,but this does not happen in the film I just watched.

I did not feel the film strayed too much from the meaning and style of the book and can't understand why the film has got such a bad press over the years.

It is not perfect but I think it would aid someone trying to understand the book,perhaps a school student who finds the book hard going.

The best version of the story is the 1954 BBC version,I love to see that on DVD.

reply

Only a few days ago I read about the "alternate" ending you describe, where Smith is shot. The author of the article said that it must have appeared only in the UK because it is not in any US version. I'd never heard of this, and now I suspect from what you write it was either never filmed, or filmed but discarded. It certainly would have ruined the story (as the 1955 British animated version of ANIMAL FARM, with its phony, tacked-on "happy" ending, did to that novel).

reply

It's scarcely a 'happy' ending: the way it is presented is very bleak, and there is no quasi-heroic music or cheesy audience manipulation. Winston's death is no great act of rebellion: the crowd take no notice of him, he shouts into emptiness, and is casually gunned down in cold blood. Julia turns back, is ordered to stop, takes one more step and is machine-gunned with as little hesitation. She does not succeed in reaching out to him. The final shot is of the bodies lying in their mutual failure in the empty square, presided over by Big Brother with dead leaves driving over them: a desolation.

What actually shook me as more of a 'betrayal' of the book was the preceding scene in which Winston suddenly asserts that his feelings for Julia have not been destroyed by their experiences in the Ministry of Love, as she says they have: it makes no difference to the outcome of the interview, but it's a jolt in the expected exchange.

~~Igenlode, who doesn't remember any happy ending to "Animal Farm"

Gather round, lads and lasses, gather round...

reply

First, per your opening paragraph, I did not say that any ending of 1984 was "happy". I was, very clearly and specifically, discussing the "happy ending" of the 1955 British film production of Animal Farm. Next time, please read the post correctly.

Second, of course there is no "happy ending" to Animal Farm -- the novel. But there absolutely is such a false ending substituted for the written one, in the '55 film I referred to, made by Halas and Batchelor Cartoon Films Ltd., the premier animators in the UK in their day. In that version, the enslaved animals finally revolt against their animal overlords and throw them out. Obviously, that's not at all what Orwell wrote. (I have not seen the 1999 made-for-cable version of the book, so I can't say how faithful it was to the novel.)

Last, as to the 1956 film version of 1984, I have finally tracked down a description and discussion of the ending you and the OP refer to -- where Smith (and Julia) are shot after they recant their "love" for Big Brother. (Basically.) Now, as I wrote three years ago, the only version of that film I ever saw or heard of ended showing Smith (Edmond O'Brien) having a chance, cold, and soulless meeting with Julia (Jan Sterling), where the two do not even face one another. In this scene, Winston does not say that his feelings for Julia haven't been destroyed -- he explicitly acknowledges that they have, in fact, been eradicated, just as in the book. He hears a triumphant bulletin on the telescreen, rushes over to it, and after hearing the news briefly notices that Julia has gone. He then turns his attention back to the news, and runs around calling out "Long Live Big Brother" to approving bystanders. The actual ending dissolves from his cheering to an aerial shot of London and a narrator stating that this could be our children's future if we don't work to preserve our freedoms. (Perhaps, in the British film, this sequence is also excised -- it does sound rather more American than British.)

This was the version released in the United States, and, apparently, most of the world. The oddly upbeat (definitely not "happy") alternate ending, where Smith and Julia are killed, but not before renouncing their allegiance to BB and finding one another again -- thereby demonstrating that the human spirit can remain free, even if at the ultimate price -- was insisted upon by British film distributors who feared the real ending was too downbeat, offering no redemptive hope for mankind. As it was, this revised ending drew harsh criticism in the UK and did not find favor with audiences there in 1956.

The 1956 film from Columbia has had only a limited, non-mainstream release on DVD in the US, and is difficult to obtain, since the Orwell estate had fought successfully to keep it off the market for years. I understand it might be more readily available in the UK, though when I looked for it when I was in London a month ago I could find only the 1984 film version. I first saw this movie in 1962 and had never seen or heard of any ending beside the one I mentioned. I would certainly like to see the British ending, which was not the original, scripted, intended ending to the film. That end is in the American version.

Curious that in the cases of the '50s film adaptations of both Animal Farm and 1984, it was the British filmmakers who opted to make their conclusions more "upbeat", thereby robbing the meaning from Orwell's original endings. I now suspect that it was because of this tampering that Orwell's widow and family have long opposed releasing the 1956 1984 onto home video -- they may be reacting to the revamped British ending instead of the intended one, the one actually seen in most of the rest of the world.

I like your signature quote from The Crimson Pirate, by the way.

reply

(I have not seen the 1999 made-for-cable version of the book, so I can't say how faithful it was to the novel.)
========================================
In the ending there, the pigs' regime collapses, some humans buy the farm, and one of the animals hope they will be "good". Deliberately ambiguous -- maybe they are "good", or maybe the speaker is naïve and the cycle of exploitation is happening again. Either way it changed from the novel.

reply

Thank you, Charles. I wonder what the problem is that no filmmaker will just make a movie faithful to the novel. Why does everyone who touches Animal Farm insist on giving it an upbeat, phony ending?

1984 still needs a decent film version. The 1956 film dwelt too much on science-fiction aspects, its dual (or dueling) endings aside. The 1984 version was in some ways better (it had an appropriate look and feel in many, but certainly not all, of its scenes) but took its own liberties with Orwell so as not to offend some people's political sensibilities -- by substituting the greeting "Brother" or "Sister" instead of Orwell's "Comrade", for one example.

reply