Agnostic, raised in the Judaistic tradition.
I interpret the scene in question to mean Inger was Resurrected spiritually within the mind and heart and soul of Mikkel, and he realized that she would continue to live on in the world through him, through their children, through their family, through all the people whom knew and loved her. He realized that the life he was living was the life after death, and in that life, Inger would continue to live and breathe life into in him and their children and family etc, his entire physical and emotional being experienced a powerful epiphanic union with [his memory of] her soul and spirit, and he endowed her spiritual essence with corporeality because is was the only way for him to unconditionally and spiritually open himself up to receive her breath of life, her existence, her spirit, her faith in him, her salvation, and his own faith in the life that would come/life that would continue) after her death, a life that would continue to be happy and fruitful despite her physical absence, a life in which she would be resurrected daily by her loved ones if they remembered her example and lived by her example. In a way, Mikkel himself was spiritually resurrected.
Anyone who has lost a beloved, whether lover or spouse or parent or sibling or child, has done what Mikkel had done, imagined the person alive and breathing for just one more minute, and had that intimate conversation, in order to come to terms with his/her death.
You don't have to be a true believer in Christianity, Judaism, Islam, etc to experience that, and, speaking as a person from a religious background, nothing about Inger waking up translates to "Jesus is your L-rd G-d and Saviour!" or "G-d exists!", itt translates to exactly what you literally see, "Resurrection!", and Resurrection is not contingent upon belief in G-d/Jesus, nor is Resurrection strictly defined as "a dead body comes back to life".
It appeared to me Dreyer (whose background I'm not yet familiar with, this was my first Dreyer film and I watched it blind), much like some of the most influential Christian philosophers who lived before and after him, was asking simple believers, Christians who subscribed to dictionary definitions of the words in the New Testament, to reconsider the crudity such blind close-minded unquestioning literalism, and instead was challenging them to take the Socratic/philosopher's route (not abandon their faith, but mine the depths of faith to discover richer meaning).
reply
share