Film Noir in Color?
This film was released as part of 20th Cent. Fox's "film noir" collection as well as being referenced in the comprehensive "Film Noir Guide" by Michael F. Keaney; furthermore IMDb has it genre listed as a "film noir."
Anyhow, I've viewed the film and it's in color (the pictures on the back of which were in black and white, a tad misleading)--which leads me to this question: can a true film noir be in color?
I know to be categorized as a "film noir" there are both aesthetic and thematic criteria, and I would say the latter is apparent in the story, man goes undercover in the seedy underworld not unlike say "Kiss of Death," but the color doesn't really lend itself to the dark moods required for the noir. It certainly falls within the classical era of the noir (as partially delineated by Paul Schrader) c. 1941-1959. The end date is significant because the 60s was the advent of full color studio film production--but film noir quite literally translates to "black film" and this closer resembles Jerry Lewis' vibrant technicolor usage.
The Keaney book, while not exactly authoritative--being that he labels a few films as noirs that I'm sure most film scholars wouldn't call "film noir" (like a number of Val Lewton horror films) also in that it's less of analytical book like Alain Silver and James Ursini's "Film Noir Reader."
What do you think? Personally I'm inclined to just call it a color drama, or just a plain crime film, but not a noir.
_____
Yeah, I'm so bad I kick my own ass twice a day.
-Creeper, the Hamburger Pimp from "Dolemite"