MovieChat Forums > Du rififi chez les hommes (1956) Discussion > THREE LOOSE ENDS AT THE END (SPOILERS)

THREE LOOSE ENDS AT THE END (SPOILERS)


First of all, this is one of my favorite films—a masterpiece. My personal favorite moment (SPOILER) is when Tony recovers his godson through the window, and gives the kidnapper Remi his due—after waking up him because “I don’t want you to miss anything.”

I do feel there are three loose ends at the film’s finish. At first glance, the movie has come to resolution---Louise has recovered her son thanks to Tony’s heroics, and the police have discovered the suitcase with the cash. However, three things bothered me a little:

1—Although I understand Louise’s joy at getting her son back, it bothered me that she seemed to pay no attention to the fact that Tony—her son’s godfather, and close family friend—was lying dead in the car.

2—Although Louise has recovered her son, there is still terrible news that she has not yet received—namely, that her husband Jo is dead.

3—The police are looking over the suitcase at the end—however, the case is far from solved. What they have recovered is not the jewels from the heist, but the cash the British fence paid for the jewels. Will they connect the money to the robbery? I expect that with some detective work, they would do that—and perhaps with the help of Scotland Yard, the British fence might be tracked down and the jewels recovered. However, the movie leaves this matter very open.

Incidentally, I find it interesting that my three favorite Dassin movies—“The Naked City,” “Rififi,” and “Topkapi”—all involved jewel heists. Apparently he had some fascination with the idea—not inappropriate, I suppose, for a man named “Jules.”

reply

Who was going to tell her that her husband was dead???

No one knew but Toni and he's dead, or near it!

Help some?

reply

1—Although I understand Louise’s joy at getting her son back, it bothered me that she seemed to pay no attention to the fact that Tony—her son’s godfather, and close family friend—was lying dead in the car.
Did she even see him dead? The police wouldn't let her near the car. Also as the wife of a con I'm sure she knows how and when to play it cool around the police.
2—Although Louise has recovered her son, there is still terrible news that she has not yet received—namely, that her husband Jo is dead.
True and all for nothing as the money they died for is lost to her and Tonio.
3—The police are looking over the suitcase at the end—however, the case is far from solved. What they have recovered is not the jewels from the heist, but the cash the British fence paid for the jewels. Will they connect the money to the robbery? I expect that with some detective work, they would do that—and perhaps with the help of Scotland Yard, the British fence might be tracked down and the jewels recovered. However, the movie leaves this matter very open.
They'll never be able to prove it because the only people who were present are all dead. The one shred of evidence was the ring that Cesar gave to Viviana and what became of that with Pierre's demise is anyone's guess.

I don't have a problem with the film leaving aspects open. It made its sad point about the 4 main protagonists. I enjoyed this film very much. Very watchable and nicely photographed.
Incidentally, I find it interesting that my three favorite Dassin movies—“The Naked City,” “Rififi,” and “Topkapi”—all involved jewel heists. Apparently he had some fascination with the idea—not inappropriate, I suppose, for a man named “Jules.”
Nice point.
Fatima had a fetish for a wiggle in her scoot

reply

I actually like the fact that they don't answer any of those questions.
Louise will probably never know how Jo died.
As for Tony, I'm not sure she even liked him. She didn't like what Jo did, and Tony was part of that.
I'm pretty sure the police will ask her about the money. However, did she even know that Jo had the money?

Such a great film!



Hitler! C'mon, I'll buy you a glass of lemonade.

reply

The movie has to end at some point. We aren't going to see the future beyond Rififi/Tony's death. Louise may not care much for Tony's death or even her husband's, as they're the ones who caused the kid to get kidnapped in the first place. She gave a speech about how the Rififi "tough guys" are actually weak, getting everyone around them into trouble. This movie is a morality tale. "Don't steal. You're not the only one going after easy money and you may just get outclassed by the competition."

reply