MovieChat Forums > The Last Time I Saw Paris (1955) Discussion > Perhaps the worst film I ever saw

Perhaps the worst film I ever saw


I'm terribly sorry, but this film is so bad it hurts. I really can't believe some people acually loved it! I saw it today for the first time, I'm going to check Amazon reviews now, it can't be only me!

reply

You can't hate it -- it's the story of F. Scott Fitzgerald and his wife Zelda and the tension with Zelda's sister over how she and Scott were raising their child (Scottie)-- according to a lot of biographers, the story this movie was based on was very true to what happened in real life to the author and his wonderfully talented wife. Reality programming before the Osbournes.

reply

I just saw it for the first time in many years. Unfortunately Hollywood has done a number on Fitzgerald's short story, Babylon Revisited.The movie bears little resemblance to the story and hence to the life of the Fitzgeralds.

reply

I just saw it on TCM, and liked it for the first time ever (haven't seen it since I was a nipper). I used to tolerate it, but now that I've grown up, lived and loved and lost and stuff it's okay. Overblown visuals in some of the saturated color in the interiors maybe, but that was the nature of the beast, 1954. The location exteriors are heartbreaking.

kcor1953
That's the beauty of it:
http://kcor1953beauty.tripod.com/blog/

reply

'you can't hate it' = hilarious.
i appreciate post-war paris. i appreciate liz taylor. i appreciate scott and zelda falling apart. i hated the movie. perhaps pinocchio as the lead had something to do with it.

reply

I bought this film in Walmart with 2 others for a dollar. So I paid 33 cents for it. And it's not worth it. This is my 3rd night trying to finish it. As story, there is still no tension, nothing to resolve. As a portrayal of "tragic" figures, I was never drawn in enough to care. As an historical document of early post-war Fance and of early stars, including the unbelievably young Roger Moore, it is fascinating. But nothing more. I assume there will be a terrible auto crash and everyone will be sad and live ever after. Anyway. it is perhaps the worst moveie I've ever seen, too! Wes.

reply

I too did not care for this film the first time I watched it.Luckily I got another chance to view it again recently.The second time was the charm as I became totally engrossed and captivated by the film,the acting,and the story of life,love and death it told.It is a very human story.I still feel this story holds relevent to lives even today.Perhaps give it another chance like I did and try to view it in the context of a story about human life. "Do not let thorns in your side become nails in your coffin".-Bruce Richard Bundy 10/2006

reply

... i chalk it up to casting. aside from the 20 yr difference between Johnson and Taylor, there just isnt the chemistry or magic between them that we see in so many other couples.

reply

Van Johnson is SO not a matinee idol. Never understood the appeal. And for Reed and Taylor to fight over him? Not bloody likely.

reply

hullo shotgunnergauge5150 rather interesting to hear u appreciated this film after seeing it a second time. the copy i saw was rather bad with the colours and images quite blurry. i couldnt manage to watch more than half an hour but the portion i saw didnt hold my interest. i daresay i didnt give this film much of a chance and perhaps i should try again.

cheers

reply

Yes,give it another try.I`m not saying the film doesn`t have its problems,but the story it tells is the heart of the picture.An open mind and no distractions are key.I just got engrossed in the story the film tells.It`s one sadly most of us can relate too in many ways.In a few ways it reminds me of an early Hitchcock classic "Rich & Strange" I believe? There are a few similarities.All in all from both films I have begun to learn a few things about life.One thing is that real love is never easy...

"Do not let thorns in your side become nails in your coffin".-Bruce Richard Bundy 10/2006

reply

"Yes,give it another try.I`m not saying the film doesn`t have its problems,but the story it tells is the heart of the picture.An open mind and no distractions are key.I just got engrossed in the story the film tells.It`s one sadly most of us can relate too in many ways.In a few ways it reminds me of an early Hitchcock classic "Rich & Strange" I believe? There are a few similarities.All in all from both films I have begun to learn a few things about life.One thing is that real love is never easy... '

quite so shotgunnergauge5150, quite so. thank u kindly for the response. i shall endeavour to give this film another chance.

cheers!

reply

I love the movie and to me it best resembles relationships in the 60's. Two people meet and are physically attractive. They get married to have children. The older husband wants to settle down, but the wife feels tied down (especially after havinng a child), so she goes out to party. The husband then reaches the point where he wants to relive his youth. This juncture usually happens just when the wife wants to settle down. They ruin their lives and look back at what they really had and how they lost it. They (in this case one) look back and see how much they loved each other and how foolish they were chasing after temporary things and not concentrating on those things everlasting.

reply

Hey Teresa Leandro, "TLTISP" is not a masterpiece, granted. IMHO not even a "good" picture. But there are tons of worst movies out there. Haven't you seen "Battlefield Earth", "Crossroads", "Norbit", "American Pie", "Hulk", "The Love Guru", etc?

At least in this movie you could enjoy the beauty and acting skills from Liz Taylor, Donna Reed, and even the "not so young" Eva Gabor.



reply

It's passable. But, should have been better. I wish that it was set in the post WWI era, as Fitzgerald wrote it in, and wasn't updated to post WWII. That was immediately bad news. Van Johnson was also weak in his role. I enjoyed, 'Tender Is the Night,' a lot better. The blurry print didn't help.

reply

The worst ever??? You don't watch many films, do you? ;-)

reply

I didn't like it either. I checked this out at the library recently for the sake of Elizabeth Taylor. I wanted to hit the stop button after about 5 min. into it. The picture was terrible...and yes, I do realize that old movies aren't gonna have the best picture available, but this was just almost unacceptable, it made Van look like he had a bad skin condition. But I bared with it though........until the point where Liz kicked it, then I said the hell with it.

Shortly before this she was in "A Place in the Sun", it's a good thing that was such a great movie, in makes up for her participation in this crap.

reply

I just watched it for free. I think its in the public domain? Anyways I was coming to imdb with a score of around 5.5-6 in my mind and was happy to see it at 6.1. Its just a passable film as someone earlier said. All glitz on top of really little substance, for example the cinematography and sets seemed nice. There is not much that keeps your interest hooked in the film. The first half is a kissing fest of thrown together scenes with Johnson and Taylor. Second half gets a little interesting with the melodrama, but too predictable at the end. You really don't know who to side with or why they are really fighting and don't turn out to care about either character imho. Van Johnson looks a little too old for Taylor and there are lot of quirky things like the way Taylor dies for one...One thing was I didn't even know the tennis player was Roger Moore that was neat to see him I guess in an earlier film appearance.

reply

[deleted]

Ridiculous, overblown comments. The worst film you've ever seen? Really?

"The Last Time I Saw Paris" is far from the top of my list of favorite movies, but it's certainly not at the bottom. Elizabeth Taylor is, as always, stunning and alluring, and delivers a solid acting performance. Van Johnson's character suffers from too many scenes where he is instructed to mope and be distraught -- certainly the film revolves around the tragedy which befalls this couple, but Johnson's constant weary attitude saps energy from the film, rather than soliciting empathy from his anguish.

Overall however, it's a decent film that shows a great deal of early 1950's Paris, with a solid story and bittersweet ending that, to it's credit, really is quite gripping. In fact, the final half-hour of this film is tremendous, enough so that it lifts the rest of the movie up significantly.

7.0 out of 10.

reply

Saw it in its entirety for the first time last night on TCM. They probably had a better print than the public domain version, and that helped, I'm sure.

I have to say I agree with eveyone's comments - good and bad. I'm glad I saw it though, if only out of curiosity. The first time I watched it was on public televsion for about ten minutes and the bad print, if nothing else, turned me off.

I don't know if I'd bother again, but if I'm particulary in the mood for a glossy weeper with great clothes (Helen Rose's fashions are still fabulous), I'll know what to reach for.

reply

Glad to see I'm not the only one either. Although the stars are all very pretty and quite talented, and color is richly used as metaphor, the characters are universally abhorrent, the plot is haphazardly developed without any apparent regard for structure or understanding of time lapse, and the role reversal of the two leads, with Liz as the husband and Van as the wife, is off-putting and the epitome of contrivance. Any viewer with even a modicum of morality should feel compelled to cheer Liz's demise, and should laugh with delight at the resulting sad spectacle that becomes of the "family." Preposterous, ludicrous, pathetic, but nicely appointed and very satisfying to those with low standards and moderate intelligence.

reply