MovieChat Forums > The High and the Mighty (1954) Discussion > *SPOILER* Question about the ending

*SPOILER* Question about the ending


Someone started a thread about this back in 2005 but there was no response. Why in blazes don't we see the interior of the aircraft as the plane finally comes in to land at SFO against all the odds? The last time we see inside the aircraft the passengers are expecting to ditch in the sea. When it became clear to them that they were actually about to touch down at their intended destination their surprise and euphoria must have been indescribable after the harrowing experience they'd been through and what they'd been told to expect. What a scene that would have made, to see that realization take hold and the ensuing outbursts of joy and exhilaration. What was the director thinking?

reply

Yes I agree it was an odd directorial decision not to cut back to the cabin passengers after the landing. We just see them instead staggering down the exterior stairs. One has to think it was a conscious decision on the part of William Wellman to go that way.

reply

To be perfectly accurate, the depiction of the landing does take place within the aircraft, accomplished with a single shot of Toby, the sleepy little boy, as we hear the tires make contact with the tarmac.

As to showing the other passengers' reaction at the moment of landing safely, my guess that the reason the choice was made to instead dissolve to the debarking sequence is this: as different emotions and reactions are displayed as those passengers exit, it might have seemed jarring and inconsistent to have shown them registering "surprise and euphoria" as a group - essentially all experiencing the same emotions simultaneously - immediately before.

Gann and Wellman apparently decided that placing the dramatic emphasis on those varying moods would provide a richer and more interesting denouement.

There may also have been something of the philosophy expressed by Kirk Douglas (as producer Jonathan Shields) in The Bad and the Beautiful at work here (and I'll have to paraphrase): "What they're feeling we'll leave to the audience to imagine. They'll imagine it better than anything you or I could ever write."


Poe! You are...avenged!

reply

Very cliche.

reply

Not at all. Showing the passengers during the landing, or showing the plane throughout the landing, would have been the cliché. Focusing only on the sleeping kid inside the plane, then showing the passengers as they debark, gives us a much better take on events.

reply

Why did the cops take away that guy when they were disembarking ? That startled me as it seemingly came out of the blue and his wife let out this scream lol.

Also, aren't you supposed to not inflate your floating device, especially if you're making a water landing ? But the crew kept telling the passengers to inflate while still in the air.

reply

Doesn't it seem as if the guy that was taken away slipped and fell? We noticed that bizarre ending as well.... and yes, you are correct- you are NOT supposed to inflate your vest while still inside the aircraft!
"Vests must remain uninflated while still in the aircraft. This is because it may otherwise hinder exit through the emergency doors or cause the jacket to tear on the way out, rendering it useless. However, it is also due to that an aircraft could potentially turn over or flood."

reply