Queeg...'villianous'? ??


Last night, I watched Caine Mutiny on TCM. Watching the introduction by Robert Osborne, he called Humphrey Bogart's role as Captain Queeg "A departure from the more recent roles he had been playing to play the villianous Captain Queeg". HUH? Captain Queeg was not villianous! He was a tragic character, someone who wanted the new Navy to be more shipshape. Villianous would be Colonel Nathan Jessup, not Captain Queeg.

reply

You are exactly right about Queeg and the proof is at the party after the court martial. Greenwald cuts Keefer down but he also rips the other officers for not supporting Queeg when he came to them for help.

Queeg made mistakes and mis-judgments. But Greenwald nailed it when he explained that Queeg was ill served by the officers serving under him. And he was willing to serve when being a soldier or sailor was not held in high regard.

It was after watching this as a 14 year old freshman in HS (during the Viet Nam war, 1970) that I learned never to denigrate the service of anyone in our armed forces. And I saw a lot of it during that war and you can see it now in what is going on in Berkeley, CA.

Now I will admit that watching the movie the first time Queeg played the villian until after Barney pointed out that Keefer was a bigger villian than Queeg ever could be.

reply

I think they mentioned that he was a good captain in the Atlantic theater but had gotten 'shell shocked' or something similar. His mental state was such that he couldn't function well at all on the Caine.

reply

I've seen the movie a few times, and I've ended up deciding there's an equal ammount of arguments for or against Queeq's being a villain. It's one of those things that make the movie great, you can't tell if Dmytryk is criticising the military, dissing those posh officers that complain over minor situations or stating that any justice is prone to manipulation by those who have enough power. Dmytryk was a victim of the infamous Witch Hunt, let's not forget that.

Since others have already argued in favour of him, let me remind you that his mistakes (running over the target practice, losing control under the typhoon) are very real, and so are the lies he utters under oath at the trial. And the defendants are risking their necks, let's not forget it.

reply

The complexities of command, and of human interaction, is what Wouk so brilliantly captured in TCM (the book, not the network). As emphasized, when they go to the Admiral but realize his frame of reference would not comprehend what they were saying.

Right, 'villainous' mischaracterizes Queeg. He's only villainous trying to download his own shortcomings onto his subordinates, which was of course his undoing. And who hasn't worked under a middle-manager who would come undone under the same cross examination?

Remember that Dmytryk was under huge pressure from Cohn to cut a ~600 page novel into a <2hr movie, and to present it such that the Navy would cooperate with the production. Not an enviable position, but enviably and admirably achieved.

reply

You may find this other thread clarifying:

http://www.badmovies.org/forum/index.php?topic=118543.new;topicseen#new

I asked to the other members of another message board if they considered Bogart the villain of the piece.

reply

I wouldn't try to compare the Queeg in Wouk's book to Bogart's Queeg, because they are very different characters. In the book, Queeg is very young, Anapolis Class of '38, so he would only be around 26 when he takes command of the Caine in 1943. From memory, he is still a Lieutenant. In peacetime, there is no way he would have command with so little experience, and this is part of the reason for his insecurity - when he takes over the Caine, he quickly changes the subject when the previous commander is surprised by his age. It doesn't help that half of his officers are older than him (none of them are Regular Navy), that some of them are much better educated, or that his first officer Tom Maryk is a professional fisherman with many more years at sea. There is a revealing scene after he runs over the target cable, when a Captain is holding an informal enquiry into the accident. Queeg can't bring himself to admit he made a mistake, even off the record. When the Captain reports back to the Admiral, he describes him as 'One of those guys who is never wrong, no matter how wrong he is.' His habit of unnecessarily reminding people that he is an Anapolis graduate also emerges in this interview - another symptom of his insecurity.

Obviously, Bogey was too old to play this Queeg, but I think he still did a brilliant job of reinterpreting the character. I actually read the book after seeing the movie, so I was quite surprised at how different it was - I have to say I preferred the movie's upbeat ending! However, I would disagree with the idea that the book denigrates the US Navy - part of Willie Keith's long process of growing up is to realise that the Navy may be a lot wiser than he or Tom Keefer imagined.

reply

I've made that point myself. In the book, Queeg (who's a Lieutenant-Commander, for the record)is assuming command of a ship for the first time. And, the ship he gets is a outmoded, derelict relic of World War I. What's more, he remains there for well over a year (when it's stated that very few captains hold their post longer than a year). So, Queeg sees his career grinding to a halt. His classmates and Academy officers junior to him are getting much more important postings (i.e. to carriers, battleships, heavy cruisers, etc in the main striking arm of the Fleet), while he's stuck on an old DMS -which are now coming under the command of Reserve officers. That's one of the things that eats at him and causes more problems. (Some of his worst episodes occur right after other officers on the ship get reassignment orders).

It becomes clear that although Queeg means well and wants to succeed, he clearly is not cut out to be an effective ship's captain. Willie once even thinks that when he can think clearly he's able to reduce Queeg to a sickly, well-meaning man who's struggling with a job that's beyond his ability.

I personally liked the book's ending where both Keefer and Willie each became -in turn- captain of the Caine, which gives them more sympathy for Queeg. Keefer, in a true moment of clarity, says how he feels command is a nightmare since one error on his part could possibly kill everyone on board. He realizes Queeg saw that truth too and it ate at him. As well, Willie's becoming the ship's final captain completes his growing up process. He goes from a green ensign to captain in two years time. Plus, he does see that the Navy -more or less- knows what it's doing. (He acknowledges that the Navy does make glaring and/or dumb mistakes on occasion, but generally works properly and its way of doing things is most effective).

reply

He most certainly was a villain. The final 'lecture' at the end of the movie omits certain facts.

Queeg ran over his own tow line and blatantly lied about having done so. A captain who refuses to accept responsibility for something that happened under his command is the epitome of poor leadership. Hell, he was actually DIRECTLY responsible for that as opposed to a careless OOD who did it while Queeg was asleep.

Queeg abandoned an entire group of landing craft at Kwajalein because of his inability to withstand the enemy fire. He blatantly lied about the range to the shore so that he could justify his turning tail.

Queeg risked the lives of his entire crew to satisfy the trivial personal objective of being the only one to comply with fleet orders despite that fact that every other officer was begging him to do the right thing.

Queeg blatantly lied on the witness stand while under oath. He bore false witness against his brother officers instead of taking responsibility for his own failures.

So Queeg was crazy. So what? Jeffrey Dahmer was crazy too, so he shouldn't characterized as a villain?

So the officers could have done more to help the captain (At the expense of their own careers mind you. Queeg was obviously going to give terrible fitness reports to officers who didn't accept his altered perception of the facts.)? Just because the officers didn't give Queeg all the help they could have excuses Queeg's actions? No it doesn't. Hell, he didn't WANT help. Every time someone offered help or guidance that in any way deviated from his mental picture, Queeg would verbally abuse and professionally harass them.

Make no mistake about it Queeg was a villain. I feel bad that his service in the Atlantic scarred him psychologically. I also feel bad about the neglected and abused childhoods experienced by serial killers. I don't however, use that as an excuse to paint them as tragic figures and ignore the harsh realities of their actions.

reply

Comparing Queeg to Jeffrey Dahmer makes no sense. Yes they both had mental problems, but chopping up people and eating them is not the same as a captain running over his own tow line and blatantly liing about it. It is, as you stated above, poor leadership. Nothing he did is comparable to what Dahmer did.

If you're looking for a villian try Jack Nichcolson in A FEW GOOD MEN, who ordered the murder of a soldier under his command

reply

I would say that lying in an official report isn't poor leadership, it's grounds for dismissal as an officer.

reply

You have obviously never been in combat. You are like an armchair QB. How dare you criticize a character that has been through a situation that would probably have you running for your mama. The real villain is Keefer. He was a coward from the start.

reply

Guitarbob:

First of all, you are outraged that I criticized a fictional character?

Second, you know absolutely nothing about me. I served as a medic (corpsman) with the marines in Iraq and took hostile fire on many occasions. I fail to see how my combat experiences (or a lack of them) would influence my evaluation of Queeg.

Third, it doesn't matter to me why he was a lying, incompetent officer. He was. In my book that makes him a villain. Feel free to disagree. I hope to one day have my own command at sea, so perhaps I hold Queeg to the same standards that I hold myself.

reply

Guitarbob:

First of all, you are outraged that I criticized a fictional character?

Second, you know absolutely nothing about me. I served as a medic (corpsman) with the marines in Iraq and took hostile fire on many occasions. I fail to see how my combat experiences (or a lack of them) would influence my evaluation of Queeg.

Third, it doesn't matter to me why he was a lying, incompetent officer. He was. In my book that makes him a villain. Feel free to disagree. I hope to one day have my own command at sea, so perhaps I hold Queeg to the same standards that I hold myself.


I completely agree with you. Queeg may have been crazy and overwrought, but he still knew what he was doing was wrong. He should chastised and disciplined as such.

reply

Guitarbob:

First of all, you are outraged that I criticized a fictional character?

Second, you know absolutely nothing about me. I served as a medic (corpsman) with the marines in Iraq and took hostile fire on many occasions. I fail to see how my combat experiences (or a lack of them) would influence my evaluation of Queeg.

Third, it doesn't matter to me why he was a lying, incompetent officer. He was. In my book that makes him a villain. Feel free to disagree. I hope to one day have my own command at sea, so perhaps I hold Queeg to the same standards that I hold myself.


I completely agree with you. Queeg may have been crazy and overwrought, but he still knew what he was doing was wrong. He should chastised and disciplined as such.

reply

So the officers could have done more to help the captain (At the expense of their own careers mind you. Queeg was obviously going to give terrible fitness reports to officers who didn't accept his altered perception of the facts.)? Just because the officers didn't give Queeg all the help they could have excuses Queeg's actions? No it doesn't. Hell, he didn't WANT help. Every time someone offered help or guidance that in any way deviated from his mental picture, Queeg would verbally abuse and professionally harass them.


Correct. That seriously weakened the movie, IMO. Greenwald railed them for their "disloyalty" and "unwillingness" to help. How exactly were they supposed to help a man who consistently threw his entire crew under the bus to keep from making himself look bad? The crew tried to give him the benefit of a doubt until their continued loyalty meant losing their lives to give undying loyalty (the only "help" the crew could give Queeg), which he didn't deserve.

Dahmer is probably not the best example. Nixon would be much more accurate. That man was the definition of paranoia!

reply

He most certainly was a villain. The final 'lecture' at the end of the movie omits certain facts.


You had a good list but left out his threatening the officer (Jerry Paris) who came to him and confessed that he had allowed the mess boys to eat the strawberries. Queeg warned him to not tell anyone or he would not be granted the emergency leave to visit a sick relative.

reply

The movie was great because there were no simplistic "villains."

Queeg did seem out of control. The Fred MacMurray character was horrible but did turn himself in when he showed up at the party to let the others confront him & risk getting denounced.

I think the officers being more supportive of Queeg may have helped but I don't know that it would have been enough to change him. When Queeg gave the 2nd apologetic speech asking for their support I was skeptical because earlier he was similarly apologetic to the young ensign he had just yelled at for untucked shirttails and it seemed like he just wanted to manipulate him into covering up the tow line accident.

reply

Queeg had an inferiority complex in addition to exhaustion from the war. He was unable to understand why the Navy had passed him by after the great cheese escapade of 1937. This was addressed in the book, however not discussed in the movie. He was also a classic micro-manager.










.

reply

Queeg was not a villain.

He was a micro-managing despot that could do no wrong in his own mind who had apparently seen more than his fair share of combat. He apparently snapped during the typhoon and all hell breaks loose as a result.

I agree with others that it was Keefer who was the REAL villain. Would anyone who wasn't villainous really put the nation and so many specific people into the wringer just to get material for a novel?

Despite the tow line, Kwaijelein or covering his own hide at the expense of others, he was not a villain. The man had problems and risked lives needlessly, behaving most cowardly at times, but Keefer, who admittedly "has a yellow streak fifteen miles wide" was the real coward, and the real villain.

I think referring to Bogey as the villain was simply a misstatement.

reply

The novel gives a much more detailed account of whether or not Queeg was really a villain.

Queeg wasn't a bad guy, per se. But, he was an incompetent and troubled officer. A further trouble in the film was that Bogart was almost twenty-five years older than the character was supposed to be in the book. He was supposed to be a nervous, young officer in his early 30's, assigned to his first command.

As well, in the book, it's described that Queeg was definitely supposed to paranoid to a certain extent. An experienced psychiatrist testifies that Queeg isn't so much telling lies as that he's altered the perception in his own mind. Greenwald gets him to admit on the stand that Queeg's behaviour are signs of a paranoid personality. The crux is that Queeg isn't considered to be crazy and that paranoia isn't supposed to disable one from command of a vessel -although the doctor admits that serving under such an individual would be most unpleasant. Captain Blakely, the President of the Court, asks the doctor a further question. He asks if an individual with paranoia tendencies could be fit for command under the normal stresses of sea command but could conceivably become temporarily incapacitated in a situation where the stresses are many times more severe than normal (i.e. like in the typhoon). The doctor admits that it's possible.

The trouble with Queeg was that his personality was that he wouldn't admit his own mistakes and -in his mind- his subordinates were always at fault when things went wrong. A scene in the book is where the ComServPac (the Admiral commands the Service Force in the Pacific) and his Chief of Staff discuss the towline incident that has been brought to his attention. The admirals asks his CoS for his opinion of Queeg. The CoS says Queeg is "An old lady...one of those types who is NEVER wrong, no matter how wrong he is." The admiral debated whether or not he should recommend Queeg be relieved of command, but decides against it as Queeg has only had the ship a few weeks and thinks he deserves a fair chance to prove himself. So, even then, Queeg was shown to be a less than idea captain.

Queeg was a career officer whose whole life was the Navy. Thus, he was driven to try and prove himself to his superiors. But...Queeg simply was not a good ship's officer. It was sort of reflected in the fact that he was an Academy graduate just getting his first command, and that was a rundown, antiquated ship. Most of the other captains of old minesweepers like the Caine were reservists. Yet, here he was, an Academy man, most of whose peers were being assigned to large, modern vessels (battleships, carriers, heavy cruisers, etc.). Queeg could see that his career was slipping away and that he was being passed by. Supposedly, his worst tantrums and behaviour came after other officers on the ship received orders from the Bureau of Personnel, assigning them elsewhere.

As time passes, Queeg pretty much retreats into an isolation most of the time, leaving the running of the ship to Maryk. Willie notes that when he's planning the search for the presumed duplicate key, Queeg seems genuinely happy for the first time in many months. Willie dislikes Queeg, but has moments where he can reduce him to a "sickly, well meaning man, struggling with a job far beyond his abilities".

So, Queeg really was never a villain, but he was an incompetent captain who was highly unpleasant to serve under.

In the book, the final chapter has Keefer becoming the ship's captain in time for the Battle of Okinawa. He falls apart when the ship is hit by a kamikaze, but Willie (now the Executive Officer) steps up and his able to save the ship. Afterwards, Keefer and Willie talk. Keefer says that he now feels more sympathy for Queeg than Willie ever could. He says command is a nightmare where one wrong decision could kill everyone aboard. He says that Queeg realized this and it's what ate away at him. As well, it was compounded by the fact Queeg was an ambitious career officer who had the added stress of knowing that his career was grinding to a halt.

Willie, that night, writes to May and sums up his feelings for Queeg. He says that he feels sorry for Queeg as he was a victim of the war, no more and no less. What he and the other officers SHOULD have done was to cover Queeg's numerous mistakes and act like he was the finest captain in the Navy. He says it's the only thing to do if you draw an incompetent a__ (which Queeg was) for a captain.

So, Queeg really wasn't a villain. He was simply an unpleasant and incompetent commanding officer. The officers made things worse both themselves and him with their universal disloyalty. It's implied that if they'd supported him and covered his mistakes they could have suffered through until Queeg finally did get reassignment orders.

reply

I wouldn't call Queeg a villain, but I do think of him as the antagonist. The characyer I really didn't like was Greenwald. Maybe he was right that Maryk didn't support Queeg when he'd asked for help. But that doesn't change the fact that Queeg shouldn't have been assigned in the first place. Someone should have noticed something earlier, which is why I'm glad Keefer was on board, even if he was less than supportive to Maryk at the end.

The Angels Have the Phone Box

reply

Keefer was the one who started the wardroom rumblings about Queeg. Most likely, if that hadn't happened Queeg would have had the wardroom behind him -even if they disliked him- and he probably would have functioned far better. In the book, Willie thinks that the relief during the typhoon was most likely not necessary. He thinks that either Queeg would have decided to come north (into the wind) on his own, or Maryk would have finally convinced him to do it. If Queeg had known his wardroom was supportive, he might have been more open to suggestions from Maryk about how to handle the ship, especially as Queeg did recognize that Maryk was an outstanding seaman (in the book, Maryk's background is given as coming from a family of commercial fishermen, and thus pretty much grew up on a boat).

reply

Another point is that they had storm experts that said Queeg was doing the right thing in the storm and the only defense arguments was that they had never been in a storm. Duh - you don't have to catch the mumps to know they are not fun.

reply

It was actually an officer who wasn't an expert on storms, but was an expert on handling destroyers -including the class of vessel the Caine belonged to.

He conceded to Greenwald that in extremis, the best thing to do would be to turn into the wind and waves, thus giving the rudder its best chance to gain purchase.

reply

I don't think somebody needs to be evil to be "villianous." I think that a highly disagreeable person who is the opponent of the hero qualifies as "the villian." Queeg was mentally ill and was a liar. He had no business being The Captain of the Ship and is lucky he did not get a bunch of his guys killed for no good reason. In my mind, he was "the villain," a bad actor. My question is this: who was the hero of the story?

reply

I first read this book in 1968 at the age of 13, and saw the film on TV the first time around then. I love them both.

What a pleasure to read intelligent, thoughtful and knowledgeable posts on a thread about one of the great chracters of American fiction.

Keep it up, guys...

reply

I've read the book several times and of course seen the film. The question of Queeg's status of good or bad is really a fascinating one, when you get down to it. Here's my own opinion, for what it's worth (I'm actually a grad student in psychology, so I know a bit about it).

Queeg is as much a victim as he is a villian. From the very first, you get the distinct impression that he's in over his head. He had only a few months as an executive officer before being given command, and at no time had he ever actually conned the ship. That's why he grounds the Caine in his first attempt to leave Pearl. The problem is (as the psychiatrists pointed out in the trial), Queeg has so much invested in his identity as a naval officer that he can't stand to admit he's wrong, and sees being wrong as a threat to his position, and hence, his identity or sense of "self". When confronted about the grounding and the famous loss of the target (when he steamed over his tow-line while bitching out Urban for his shirt-tail), the commander accepted Queeg's story...but not without some serious reservations. He went so far as to offer Queeg a post in San Francisco, witht he promise of an excellent fitness report; claimed it was a way of making up for an obviously wrong assignment, and some shore time for Queeg (who'd been at sea for several years). Queeg didn't accept. The commander then went to the admiral, who didn't trust Queeg either, and had him transferred to another command.

The commander and admiral were right in their assumption that Queeg wasn't truly ready for command, but didn't act on it. They should have, because it's true; Queeg WASN'T ready. But here's the thing. Ready or not, he tried his best. As Willie later realizes in the novel, Queeg conned the Caine for 15 months with no major disasters, and with the ill-will of his entire wardroom. Would the ship have been lost in the typhoon if Maryk hadn't taken over? Maybe, but who knows? The question isn't whether or not Queeg was a good officer, but whether or not he should have been forcibly relieved.

It's quite clear that Queeg isn't a good officer at all. Mental problems aside, he's not too bright, he's mean, and he lies through his teeth. He should never have had command, but once he had it, he deserved better. I wonder often what would have happened had Maryk went to him and simply told him man-to-man that he was there to support him, and would help him in any way Queeg needed. Would Queeg respond? Don't know, really; he might see the offer of help as a perception of his weakness and disregard it, but you never know.

So what did he do wrong? Well, he lied continually. He unfairly punished the officers and men, often to the point of endangering the shipt (for example, not letting the officer's sleep and then putting them on watch...that's a damn dangerous combination). He persecuted Stillwell out of spite, held up promotions and transfers, and was a coward in battle. Yes, a coward. Maybe he had the right to be, but sick or not, the fact is he DID run from the beach in the Kwajelien invasion, and he DID run off leaving the Stanfield to take fire from a shore battery when he could have helped engage it.

But is he a villain for this? Nah. Not really. Undesireable, yes, but not a villian. No, the real villian was Keefer, who was just too damn smart for his own good. It was fine for Keefer to bitch about Queeg and talk about how he was paranoid, but when it came time to put up or shut up, he turned turtle and refused. Then in the trial, he outright lied. That was actually fortunate for Maryk, but still it was a shameful thing to do, hanging his freind out to dry over his own ideas like that.

So to me, Queeg was a victim of the war, his position, and the treachery of Keefer. All the rest follows from that. Maryk, too, was a victim; had it not been for Keefer he probably wouldn't have ever relieved Queeg. As Willie surmised, during the storm there'd have been some wrangling and Queeg would have eventually come north if things got too bad. I wouldn't want to serve with Queeg, and would probably hate him, but knowing what we know, it's pretty clear he isn't really a villian.

reply

It IS a pleasure, isn't it?

That's one reason I enjoy being a big fan of the old, classic movies so much: so many other REAL fans are intelligent, well-spoken adults - though I think it's also ok (and maybe even important) to remain children at heart.


"Think slow, act fast." --Buster Keaton

reply

He was NOT 'villainous'. He had already given his nervous system in service to the country and had no more to give. He was a walking nervous breakdown for a good reason, which was being in too many hellish battles.

reply

The penultimate poster had it right.

Queeg acted in a villainous way, but wasn't truly a villain himself. He was a mean-spirited, petty and incompetent officer but wasn't outright evil. He was a man trying his best at a job that was far beyond his abilities.

In the book, it's implied that it wasn't his years of service that did him in. It was simply being in command of the ship. As Keefer later explains to Willie when he's in command and, like Queeg, struggles badly with the job: one wrong decision at the wrong time can conceivably kill every man on the ship. He was fine as a subordinate officer when he didn't have final responsibility for the ship and crew. But, as captain, where he knew the buck stopped with him, it tore him apart. Willie says, at the court martial, that Queeg actually seemed calmer AFTER he was relieved. Willie thought that was because he didn't have the responsibility for the ship's safety on his shoulders any longer.

The film suggested Queeg was worn out by combat in the Atlantic. In the book, Queeg is just not suited for command of a ship and he -deep down- knows it. He can't bring himself to ask for help. The sad irony is that if he'd asked for help, the officers would have probably stepped up and helped him, thus making life easier for everyone.

reply