MovieChat Forums > Inferno (1954) Discussion > 'Ordeal' a remake, almost

'Ordeal' a remake, almost


Twenty years later, the writer, Francis Cockrell, got this movie remade for TV as "Ordeal," starring Arthur HIll. The story was faithful to the original, right up until the end. The characters also had different names.

Instead of getting rescued by the old codger and ultimately getting his revenge on both his wife and her lover, the tycoon builds a fire to attract a circling airplane, only to conclude that it contained the wife and her lover, and they were making sure he was dead.

He quickly eliminates all evidence of his presence (he thinks) and watches from hiding as the two conspirators return to the site by car to where they'd seen smoke. They reveal their criminal intents, and he unintentonally reveals his survival by leaving one clue: he had cut his wife's scarf off his arm, and she finds it hanging from a bush near the water hole that had saved him.

After the dissolve, we see the tycoon limping out of the desert toward the Sheriff's car, which is sitting by the couple's car. He identifies himself and learns that the couple had become lost in the night, but were found by his deputies.

The Sheriff takes him toward the nearest town. He asks what the tycoon wants him to do about the couple. "I walked away and got lost in the desert," he replies. "Is that a crime?" Then he asks to be let out of the car before entering the town so he can walk in from the desert. "I can't explain why right now."

The film goes to titles as we watch him walking in from desert.

What? No revenge? Nobody goes to jail? Very unsatisfying alternative ending. And, no delightful old desert rat as a hero. Up to that point, though, the film was almost as good as the original. Good cast. Good film making.

reply

I guess the intent was to show that he became a "better man" because of the "Ordeal". But I agree. The new ending sucked. BTW the remake, if anything is harder to come by than the original.

reply

The OP forgot to add that when the sheriff asks the millionaire what he wants to do about his wife and her lover, he tells him to do "nothing" -- that's where the business of "I just got lost" came into play. The sheriff replies, "You're a hell of a man," thereby showing that he had indeed become "better" as a result of his ordeal.

But while this new ending was a big cop-out, I thought even the characters weren't as sharp or interesting as in the original. Arthur Hill was never as nasty or determined as Robert Ryan, Diana Muldaur not as venal or sexy as Rhonda Fleming, and James Stacy not as smart, clever or vicious as William Lundigan. Ordeal was okay, but nowhere near as good as Inferno, anywhere along the line.

Fox Movie Channel used to run Ordeal fairly often, but they've changed their programming so may not do so anymore. It's possible this TV-movie might one day pop up on the newly-announced Fox Classic Archives MOD series, though so far this seems to be limited to actual films, not TV stuff.

reply

[deleted]

If you have Time Warner Cable, "Inferno" is available for free on the VOD Movies channel (it's the On Demand Portal). I had actually watched "Ordeal" first perhaps a year ago or so (can't recall the channel though), and when I read the on-screen guide description for "Inferno" the other day I confused it with the remake. They really are quite similar. It did take me about 20 minutes into the film to realize it wasn't the TV movie version. I don't have a problem with the ending of the remake. Even if the tycoon didn't want to press charges, I believe the wife and her lover would get their comeuppance eventually anyway (hopefully by the state prosecutor since there are laws against attempted murder...you just know they would rat each other out).

For me the main difference between the two films is that "Inferno" seems to move along a lot more quickly than the TV remake.

reply